Welcome to The Islamic Forum

We are pretty sure you will enjoy your stay wih us here

We welcome all people from around the world, regardless of their faith system.

Our discussions cover a wide range of topics.

So, what do you want to discuss today?

 

Jump to content

     

Photo
- - - - -

Seriously, Isn't The Source Of The Qur'an In Doubt?


  • Please log in to reply
102 replies to this topic

#101 al faqeer

al faqeer

    Community Leader

  • Senior Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,385 posts
  • Religion: Islam

Posted 13 June 2012 - 01:15 PM

I don't believe Muhammad was a prophet. In my honest opinion, I believe that all Muhammad did was steal things out of the Bible and twist them around to make himself look like he had divine revelations from the Angel Gabriel. Muhammad never talks about all the Miracles that Jesus worked which clearly show that Jesus was more than just a prophet of God. The Bible warns of false prophets who are wolves in sheeps clothing. And this is exactly what Muhammad was. Muhammad was the so-called " seal " of the prophets, and if Jesus was nothing more than a prophet (just like Muhammad), then how come Jesus worked Miracles and Muhammad didn't ? I think Muhammad had an above average IQ for his time and wanted to deceive people into following him ( so he could be famous ) so he created this cult known as Islam. If it wasn't for the Bible the Koran wouldn't exist, simple as that. Seems like everything else in the Bible is OK to Muhammad except for Jesus being the Son of God. Doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Then again, Muhammad had to change some things up to make it appear as if he really was a prophet who had new divine revelation. If he didn't do that, all Muhammad would have done was repeat the exact same stories that are in the Bible which wouldn't make him look like a prophet at all. Really easy to see through rubbish if you really use your mind.

Cheers


Miracles Proves nothing mate , and thats according to Jesus from the very verse you quoted of false prophets in where he states that the false prophets can perform miracles :) , so if false prophets can perform miracles then what does it count ? .

However if you see the Holy Quran you see the greatest miracle of ultimate perfection , and not like the earthly man made bible.

#102 abdullahfath

abdullahfath

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 433 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Religion: Islam

Posted 26 July 2012 - 01:33 PM

Salaam alaiykum,

bismillah ar rahmnir rahim

@ Andrew Brown:

I know where you are coming from. At one point I thought as you do. There is some logical flaws with what you are saying though. First, of all, the Bible was not readily available as it is now. If you know about Christianity then you know that at the point in question the Bible was limited to the church and was only available in Latin as that was the language that they preferred up in Rome. Are you claiming that an illiterate man was able to read the Bible? That is funny. Or are you trying to say that he heard the stories of the Bible and managed to memorize them and repeat them? That is quite a feat. There was very few that had the kind of knowledge you are trying to credit the prophet with.

If you want to speak about using your mind you must understand that there is more to it than just looking at the two books. Not only must you look at the Bible and the Qur'an but you must also think of the time period and know the history of what was going on at the time in order to understand it all. What you are trying to claim is so common it has been used since the twentieth century. But, if you look back to the time of his revelation you will find that the enemies of Islam never made this claim and do not think that the prophet was without Christian enemies. If it was as you claim and just a rinse and repeat so to speak do you not think that the Christians of his era would have seen that?

Now that we have gone over the illogical stance let us consider some basic logic on the Qur'an itself. Would you, if you were just a smart person, dictate a book chapter by chapter and have verses in it that chastise you? Yet, the Qur'an chastises the prophet and even tells us that he is just a man. I know all the miracles of Jesus (pbuh) personally as someone that grew up in the Bible and was a die hard Christian to the core and I can tell you truthfully that the miracles of Jesus (pbuh) was performed before him by previous prophets. Ishmael (pbuh) rose the dead, fed the hungry, healed the diseased (any of these sound familiar?). The greatest mircale of Isa (pbuh) was not his miracles but his birth.

In closing the Qur'an speaks of your kind and it responds to it as well. It challenges those who would doubt it to produce a surah like it.

#103 AHMAD_73

AHMAD_73

    Advanced Member

  • IF Guardians
  • 1,188 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:EGYPT
  • Religion: Islam

Posted 26 July 2012 - 10:38 PM

Salaam alaiykum,

bismillah ar rahmnir rahim

@ Andrew Brown:

I know where you are coming from. At one point I thought as you do. There is some logical flaws with what you are saying though. First, of all, the Bible was not readily available as it is now. If you know about Christianity then you know that at the point in question the Bible was limited to the church and was only available in Latin as that was the language that they preferred up in Rome. Are you claiming that an illiterate man was able to read the Bible? That is funny. Or are you trying to say that he heard the stories of the Bible and managed to memorize them and repeat them? That is quite a feat. There was very few that had the kind of knowledge you are trying to credit the prophet with.

If you want to speak about using your mind you must understand that there is more to it than just looking at the two books. Not only must you look at the Bible and the Qur'an but you must also think of the time period and know the history of what was going on at the time in order to understand it all. What you are trying to claim is so common it has been used since the twentieth century. But, if you look back to the time of his revelation you will find that the enemies of Islam never made this claim and do not think that the prophet was without Christian enemies. If it was as you claim and just a rinse and repeat so to speak do you not think that the Christians of his era would have seen that?

Now that we have gone over the illogical stance let us consider some basic logic on the Qur'an itself. Would you, if you were just a smart person, dictate a book chapter by chapter and have verses in it that chastise you? Yet, the Qur'an chastises the prophet and even tells us that he is just a man. I know all the miracles of Jesus (pbuh) personally as someone that grew up in the Bible and was a die hard Christian to the core and I can tell you truthfully that the miracles of Jesus (pbuh) was performed before him by previous prophets. Ishmael (pbuh) rose the dead, fed the hungry, healed the diseased (any of these sound familiar?). The greatest mircale of Isa (pbuh) was not his miracles but his birth.

In closing the Qur'an speaks of your kind and it responds to it as well. It challenges those who would doubt it to produce a surah like it.

as-salamo alykom
i like to add one important point to what brother Abdullah mentioned

although many events and stories had been mentioned in both the Quran and the bible, but generally the Quranic naration is more logic, reasonable and sientific, for example
the story of creation of the universe: in the bible, there is a great problems in the proceedures of creation of the universe and the earth and the same of the arangements of creations on earth. while the Quranic story avoided all of these problems and added a new miracle of relating the universe age to the formation of the earth which is 6 days to 2 days (3:1). which is almost the same ratio the sientists talk about 13.7 BY : 4.6 BY (3:1).

Noah people flood, the bible tells many unlogic points about this flood, it covered the whole earth, the size of the ship that can bear all the earthcreatures, the time on board without food or water,......... while the quranic story avoided these points.

the time of man on earth: from Adam to Noah to Ibrahim to....Jesus which is around 4000-5000 years which is totally illogical, the Quran never talk about such numbers.

the death of Moses pharouh in the sea: the bible mention no thing about that, while the Quran tells that this pharouh died in the sea and his corp will be saved to be a sign to the next generations, which been proved by an Egyptian-French profesional team in the 1970s.
...............................ETC.

it seems like that, Muhammad (pbuh) copied the biblical stories, BUT after correcting the mistakes and adding a new miraculaous facts which is not mentioned in the bible and he himself never know about it before. OR IN A MORA LOGICAL EXPLANATION, the bible and the Qurn both have the same source, the omni-Knowlagable god, while the Quran kept pure and been meraculasly preserved while the bible been distorted by adding and removing by some men.