Ok, let me rephrase. I fail to see intelligent design in anything natural.
wow so even a flower or a plant or a tree that produces you dont see any intelligence in that???..... ok
When a volcano erupts, and the molten rock flows, it forms into igneous rock. We don't say that the igneous rock was intelligently designed, do we? No, we say it's a natural process.
If it's unintelligent to study physics and say there's no aparent intelligent design to it, then you're saying to study and understand physic you have to say that there is intelligent deign. Really?
the primary task instudying physics is to understand its basic principles, hmmmm physics has principles?? physics has structure??? Pyhsics deals with pyhsical change of objects, it shows accurate predictions of the behaviour of complex systems. But but you say there s no intelligent design in phisics
Show me ONE single published, peer-review paper that concludes that the laws (no moral laws, don't get that confused.) of physics were intelligently designed.
Oh, and from a reputable source, not some creationist journal - that is obviously trying to push its creationsit agenda.
Einsteinâ€™s belief in an intelligent designer derived not from a pre-conceived religious bias, but from the phenomenal insights into the Universe that he possessed as the most brilliant scientist who ever lived. His recognition of a creator refutes the recent claims by atheists that belief in any sort of god is unscientific.
I mean, if what you're claiming is even remotely accurate, then physics journals would be stock full of papers confirming the evidence for the existence of an intelligent designer.
You're once again not getting what I'm saying. WE DON'T KNOW WHERE THE MATTER CAME FROM. To say that it was an intelligent designer is stupid, there's absolutely no empirical evidence to support that
so Einstien was stupid???
Just don't be so arrogant as to assume you know - you don't. You don't know that there was a creator, you don't know that the universe is a creation and you don't know that it's Allah. There's absolutely no evidence to support that. Real evidence. There's also no possible way to falsify it.
You're assuming that everythign was created. Just saying it as if it's blatently obvious, yet there's clearly no evidence to support this, otherwise it'd've been published in a journal, and the person who published it would be up there with the likes of Darwin, Newton, Galileo, Pasteur or Einstein.
Einstein believed that there is a God
Two words - NATURAL PROCESS.
now your on the right track now keep studying the natural process and you will arrive at God.........study study study!