Jump to content
Islamic Forum

wiseguy

IF Guardian
  • Content count

    2,698
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by wiseguy

  1. Aipac On Trial

    ZIONIST POWER STRUCTURE IN AMERICA Source: mysite.verizon###### Now that we have established the ruthless and criminal nature of radical Zionism, one more lesson needs to be understood before we return to the five dancing israelis of 9-11 and other related stories. Even the Zionists themselves have never denied that they have long exerted great influence in America. But what we must understand is that the Zionists do not merely influence United States policy....they dominate it! It is this domination that enables them to pull off monstrous crimes and then conceal them from the general public. The observation that Zionists dominate the American media, government, academia, and Hollywood has been made by many prominent Americans and is easily verifiable by public information. Henry Ford said this: "If after having elected their man or group, obedience is not rendered to the Jewish control, then you speedily hear of "scandals" and "investigations" and "impeachments" for the removal of the disobedient. Usually a man with a "past" proves the most obedient instrument, but even a good man can often be tangled up in campaign practices that compromise him. It has been commonly known that Jewish manipulation of American election campaigns have been so skillfully handled, that no matter which candidate was elected, there was ready made a sufficient amount of evidence to discredit him in case his Jewish masters needed to discredit him." Charles Lindbergh said this: "Their greatest danger to this country lies in the Jewish ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio, and our government." Admiral Thomas Moorer, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff under Ronald Reagan said this: "I've never seen a President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to them [the israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The israelis know what is going on all the time. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on." While a guest on ABC's Face the Nation, William Fulbright - US Senator and Chairman of the US Foreign Relations committee - said this before a national television audience: "israel controls the United States Senate. We should be more concerned about the United States' interests." Nationally syndicated columnist and former presidential candidate Patrick Buchanan said: "The United States Congress is israeli occupied territory." FACT: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, UPN, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Daily News, Time Magazine, Newsweek, People Magazine, US News and World Report and countless other media and Hollywood companies all have either a Zionist CEO, a Zionist News Chief, or are owned by a media conglomerate which has a Zionist CEO. 39 Have you ever noticed how Hollywood movies always seem to portray Germans and Arabs as a bigoted fanatics or as terrorists? Now you know why! FACT: AIPAC, the israeli lobbying organization, is the most feared lobby in Washington DC. By their own admission, they are capable of unseating Congressmen and Senators that do not carry out their requests. The majority of Congressmen from both political parties receive large donations from AIPAC. Writing for the Nation Magazine, journalist Michael Massing explains: "AIPAC is widely regarded as the most powerful foreign-policy lobby in Washington. Its 60,000 members shower millions of dollars on hundreds of members of Congress on both sides of the aisle." Newspapers like the New York Times fear the Jewish lobby organizations as well. "It's very intimidating," said a correspondent at another large daily. "The pressure from these groups is relentless." (emphasis added) FACT: The Pentagon is under the control of a hard core Zionist named Richard Perle. The civilian Defense Policy Board actually wields more control over the military establishment than the Defense Secretary or the generals and admirals. There are a number of other Zionists who serve on the board (Kissinger, Cohen, Schlessinger) as well as non-jewish members who have always supported israel and the expansion of the "War on Terror". The notoriously belligerent Perle, nicknamed the "The Prince of Darkness", is Chairman of the Board. With Perle as Chairman of the Defense Policy Board, Zionist Paul Wolfowitz as Undersecretary of Defense, and Zionist award winner Douglass Feith as Undersecretary of Defense Policy, the Zionist Pentagon gang controls 3 of the top 4 civilian leadership positions of America’s armed forces. Careerist scoundrels like Condoleeza Rice and Donald Rumsfeld are either under their influence or unwilling to oppose their drive for WW III. The Perle-Wolfowitz-Feith gang represent a fanatical and warmongering "government-within-a-government". In league with these Zionist Pentagon conspirators are jewish Zionist and potential 2004 Presidential candidate, Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) and his Gentile partner in crime Senator John McCain (R-AZ). An israeli journalist named Ari Shavit, lamenting the harsh treatments that his government dishes out to the Palestinians, made the following observation in Ha'aretz, a leading israeli journal: " We believe with absolute certitude that now, with the White House and Senate in our hands along with the Pentagon and the New York Times, the lives [of Arabs] do not count as much as our own. Their blood does not count as much as our blood. We believe with absolute certitude that now, when we have AIPAC [the israel lobby] and [Edgar] Bronfman and the Anti-Defamation League, , we truly have the right to tell 400,000 people that in eight hours they must flee from their homes. And that we have the right to rain bombs on their villages and towns and populated areas. That we have the right to kill without any guilt." In 2001, the Washington Times ran a story about a 68 page research paper issued by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS). The research was compiled by 60 US Army officers as an attempt to predict the possible outcomes of deploying a US force to maintain peace between the israel and Palestinians. Here’s what SAMS had to say about the israeli military machine: "a 500 pound gorilla in israel. Well armed and trained. Operates in both Gaza and the West Bank. Known to disregard international law to accomplish mission" Of israel’s Mossad, the officers issued this warning: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target US forces and make it look like a Palestinian Arab act." (emphasis added) Why does the US, which is trillions of dollars in debt, gives away billons of taxpayer dollars to a foreign government whose military violates international laws and whose Mossad is capable of murdering US troops in order to frame Arabs? Have we lost our minds? Conclusion: Sharon's Infamous Comment - "We Control America" During an argument between the israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Foreign Minister Shimon Peres, Peres said that Isralis' policies of continued violence might "turn the US against us". To this Sharon retorted: "EVERY TIME WE DO SOMETHING, YOU TELL ME AMERICANS WILL DO THIS AND WILL DO THAT. I WANT TO TELL YOU SOMETHING VERY CLEAR: DON'T WORRY ABOUT AMERICAN PRESSURE ON israel; WE, THE JEWISH PEOPLE, CONTROL AMERICA. AND THE AMERICANS KNOW IT." -- israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon October 3, 2001 (IAP News) It therefore follows that America is fighting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq under Zionist control. Jews rule America (and most of the world) by proxy. They trick us into fighting and dying for THEM. Politicians of the 'free world' are too cowardly oppose Zionism. Reference: 1. The International Jew. By Henry Ford. 2. Jewish Frontier. Lindbergh and the Jews. By Hal Derner. 3. They Dare to Speak Out. By Paul Findley. 4. Senator William Fulbright on ABC's Face the Nation. 5. Patrick Buchanan on the Mclaughlin Group. 6. Who Rules America? By Dr. William Pierce. 7. The israel Lobby. By Michael Massing.The Nation Magaazine. 8. Saudis Lash Out at 'Zionist' U.S. Critics By Marc Perelman. Jewish Forward. 9. Ari Shavit. Ha'aretz israel, reprinted in New York Times. May 27 1996. 10. The Washington Times. Army Study Suggests U.S. Force of 20,000. By Rowan Scarborough. September 10, 2001.
  2. 6 Men Trying To Attack Army Base

    Federal Bureau of Entrapment: Orchestrating Terrorism Paul Craig Roberts | June 7 2005 (Source: ######prisonplanet###### ) The US has a vast and very expensive Homeland Security bureaucracy with nothing to do. There hasn't been a terrorist attack in America since 2001. There have been a vast quantity of terror alerts, the purpose of which was to scare Americans into supporting an unnecessary and illegal aggressive attack on Iraq. As very few, if any, real terrorists have turned up, the FBI has resorted to creating terrorists by soliciting Muslim-Americans and appealing to them with schemes to aid "jihadists." Recently, two American citizens were caught in a FBI sting. One, an Ivy-League educated physician, is charged with agreeing to provide medical care to wounded holy warriors in Saudi Arabia. The other, a famous jazz musician, is charged with agreeing to train jihadists in martial arts. According to the Washington Times (June 1) the FBI began its sting in 2003, so it took two years of work and cajoling to manufacture the case against these two Americans. What the FBI has done to Dr. R.A. Sabir and to Tarik Shah was once known as entrapment. Judges would throw out entrapment cases, because crime was believed to require intent to commit a crime. If the intent was given to the accused by the police through enticement or threats, it was not regarded as criminal intent on the accused person's part. Unfortunately, "law and order" conservatives used fear of crime to "give our police more effective measures to clear criminals off our streets" and managed to eliminate the entrapment defense. Some years ago the FBI, posing as Arab oil sheiks, entrapped US Representatives in a sting operation. The FBI handed out large bundles of cash to Congressmen who accepted the offer to represent the fake sheiks' interests. Film footage of the Congressmen stuffing their pockets with money was all the FBI needed to convict the members. The fact that campaign contributions come from interest groups that expect to be represented did not count in the stung US Representatives' favor. Note that the two latest victims, Sabir and Tarik, could not have offered their services to jihadists, because no jihadists were present. Note also that Sabir and Tarik are not accused of actually performing an act of service. Sabir and Tarik had no contact with real jihadists, and they committed no act of service to jihadists. Yet, both face $250,000 fines and 15 years in prison. All that happened was that two productive American citizens were deceived by government agents for no other purpose than those agents having to show "results" in the "war on terror." How does it make us safer to put a medical doctor and a jazz musician in prison? Why did the FBI spend two years entrapping these two American citizens? Both men have wives and children. Suppose both men agreed to provide some service to jihadists. (We don't know that they did. We only have the FBI's word for it, a word that is not worth much.) The reason could easily be fear of reprisals. Suppose you are a Muslim-American and FBI agents misrepresenting themselves as dangerous jihadists demanded services of you? Neither of the accused agreed to participate in a terrorist act: no bombs, no shootings, no hijackings. A doctor agreed to keep his Hippocratic oath if presented with wounded people in Saudi Arabia. A jazz musician agreed to teach martial arts. When was the last time a terrorist attacked with judo or karate? Many years ago there was a movie about a British medical doctor who treated a man wounded in an act of rebellion against England. The English judge, portrayed in the movie as unjust in the extreme, ruled that being humane was tantamount to being a rebel and the doctor was sold into slavery to the Spanish. Unless memory fails, the movie was "Capital Blood" with Errol Flynn. In the movie, the doctor did actually treat the wounded man. The charge against Dr. Sabir is that he agreed to treat a wounded man if presented with one in Saudi Arabia in the future. There is no way of knowing if he would have done so. But if the US is prepared to deny medical treatment to its opponents, why does anyone doubt the torture stories? The FBI is so desperate to capture a terrorist that it spent two years setting up a doctor on this specious charge. Like the police who find it easier to frame people than to convict them on the evidence, the FBI will find it easier to manufacture "terrorists" with entrapment than to catch real terrorists. Get Alex Jones and Paul Joseph Watson's books, ALL Alex's documentary films, films by other authors, audio interviews and special reports. Sign up at Prison Planet.tv - CLICK HERE.E MAIL THIS PAGE
  3. 6 Men Trying To Attack Army Base

    MY COMMENT ON Russ of Vespuccia 'S STATEMENTS: 'Russ of Vespuccia' said "In all fairness, I'm afraid that I must admit that a US base wherever it is can be a legitimate target. I don't know where Geneva stands on weekend soldiers, however. " My response: During the Second World War , the American Air Force attacked and bombed Germany to kill innocent and defenseless German civilians and weekend soldiers. Therefore the US weekend soldiers can be attacked and killed by their enemies in USA. After all it is the US Armed Forces that are attacking and terrorizing sovereign countries such as Iraq, Somalia, Afghanistan etc and massacre innocent and defenseles people of the countries. 'Russ of Vespuccia' said " And guys, I really don't think this is a hoax. There is an incredible amount of evidence stacked up against these Jihadis, Including the fact that they have records of them trying to buy weapons overseas, training in the Poconos, etc. Also, ######, do you even have a fundemental understanding about how the judicial system works? Why don't you think that the prosecutors would be the ones to accuse these men? They are citizens, they will get defence attorneys, they will be judged by a jury of their peers, and if found guilty, will not probably be sent to guantanamo since they seem to have operated indipendently, but will be imprisoned in a federal institution, like any other criminal. They will get to appeal the verdict all the way up to the supreme court if they feel like it. And since they did not kill anyone, they probably won't get the death penalty. " My response: Since when you, FBI, the prosecutors and the media become the judges over the case? You , FBI, the prosecutors and the media are prejudging the six Muslim men that may inlfuence the juries and public to deny the right of the men to have a fair trial. During the Oklahoma Bombing, Muslims were prejudged by the US authorities and the media that caused the non-Muslims to terrorize and persecute Muslims in USA. Then it was found out that the terrorists who bombed the Federal building were the Christians themselves! And the Muslims become the victims of the US bigotry! 'Russ of Vespuccia' said " ######, as he is apparently calling himself now, show his utter ignorance about two sentences into his screed. No, it is not common practice to buy assault rifles in the US, as they are banned in most (if not all) states for civilian use. Even if 70 million Americans own guns, the vast majority of those are 9mm pistols. They placed these orders for big weapons on the black market, which raises eyebrows whether the buyers are muslim or not. " My response: I am not an ignorant man. It is a common practice for Americans to buy assault rifles or assault weapons (AW) in the US. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban (AWB) was a provision of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, a federal law of the United States that included a prohibition on the sale of semi-automatic "assault weapons" manufactured after the date of the ban's enactment. The ten-year ban was passed by Congress on September 13, 1994 and was signed into law by President Bill Clinton the same day. The ban expired on September 13, 2004, as part of the law's sunset provision. On March 2, 2004, with 'sunset' of the ban on the horizon, assault weapon ban supporter Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) attached a ten-year extension to the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban to the Senate's Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. With the Feinstein amendment, the bill was voted down 8-90. The expiration came in 2004 and Americans are allowed to buy assault rifles. Since 1991 (three years before the ban), the nation`s violent crime rate has decreased every year, 35% overall, to a 27-year low, according to the FBI. According to federal crime victim surveys, violent crime is at a 30-year low. Meanwhile, the number of privately-owned guns, including hundreds of thousands of assault weapons (AWs) and nearly identical guns has risen by more than 60 million. The number of "large" magazines has risen by 50 million since 1994.18 Today, there are more guns (including more AWs) and "large" magazines than ever." Reference: 15. Crimes reported to police (######bjsdata.ojp.usdoj.gov/dataonline/Search/Crime/Crime.cfm and ######fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm). 16. Bureau of Justice Statistics, "Criminal Victimization 2002" (######ojp.usdoj.gov./bjs/abstract/cv02.htm). 17. BATFE, Firearms Commerce in the United States, 2001/2002 (######atf.gov/pub/fire-explo_pub/firearms commerce/index.htm). 18. "Schumer Moves to Renew Federal Ban on Assault Weapons," May 8, 2003 (######senate.gov/~schumer/
  4. 6 Men Trying To Attack Army Base

    MY COMMENT: The US Armed Forces and their soldiers become legitimate targets when the US Armed Forces and their soldiers attack, invade and occupy sovereign countries and they attack and destroy civilian targets and terrorize, rape, torture, murder and massacre innocent people of the countries such as Iraq, Somalia and Afghanistan. By violating the Geneva Conventions and the International Law, the US Armed Forces and their soldiers are the terrorists. Why don't you call the US soldiers, Marines etc the terrorists instead of calling the 6 Muslim men ' the terrorists' who did not and do not kill anybody? You are practising double standard...You are biased! Bush declares that Iraq is a legitimate targets for having WMDs eventhough we and the UN inspectors and the US Armed Forces did not and do not find any WMDs in Iraq so by using Bush's declaration the US regime and its US Armed Forces are the legitimate targets for having so many WMDs and nuclear weapons in USA!
  5. 6 Men Trying To Attack Army Base

    MY COMMENT: How do you know that it was a direct quotation taken from one of the men? Did the media tell you so? The media have been known to alter news to favor the owners of the media who are mostly Zionists! The media also provoke the illegal war on Iraq by inventing lies such as the non-existent WMDs in Iraq. And we know that the Zionist media are inventing lies and fairy tales to trick the Americans into attacking Iran!
  6. Muslims Of Gujarat-india

    For Human Rights Watch's original report on the 2002 massacres of Muslims and Hindus in Gujarat, "We Have No Orders to Save You," please see (you are not allowed to post links yet)"http://######hrw######/reports/2002/india/"]######hrw######/reports/2002/india/[/url]. Testimony from the report Compounding Injustice: The Government's Failure to Redress Massacres in Gujarat Khalid Noor Mohammed Sheikh lost nine family members in the February 2002 massacre in Naroda Patia, Ahmedabad, including his pregnant thirty-year-old daughter Kauser Bano. Her belly was cut open and the fetus was pulled out and hacked to pieces before she was killed: I took [my daughter] Kauser to the hospital for delivery the day before the attack. She was ready to deliver. But the doctor said there was time and to come back in the morning. But there was no morning after. By then it was all over. And the tragedy is that the people who ripped my daughter's child out of her body and killed her are walking about freely. Why does it have to be this way?. Please make every effort that the criminals get punished. Even if they don't get punished a lot, they should at least get punished a little.. They keep going on about Muslim terrorists, but who are the terrorists? Those who torture Muslims so much should be punished a bit. In a family of nine, I am the only survivor. Whom should I live for now? R. Bibi's thirty-six-year-old son was killed by the police in Naroda Patia: A lot happened that day. The crowds came. Everything was destroyed. We didn't know what was going on, that something was going to happen. We were just doing our work. Suddenly there was an attack. They were raping women. Then they were killing them, burning them and cutting them up into pieces. The police killed my son. They shot him.. The government tells us to bring proof when we go to ask for [compensation].. My life was taken away when they shot my son. Everything has been taken away and now they want evidence, where will I get the body from? I wasn't even able to see his body.. They stole everything, they burnt everything, they killed people, and [Rs. 1,250 (U.S.$27)] is all we got. Now my daughters go and do housework in other people's homes. They wash dishes, they sweep and clean.. We find some way to fill our stomachs. Somehow we have to survive.. It's too much. Even now we have no relief. Nishith Acharya is a volunteer at the Akshardham cultural complex in Gandhinagar and was an eyewitness to the September 2002 massacre of Hindus there: They threw something inside, a grenade, into the bookstore. By God's grace it did not explode in the bookstore. One middle-aged lady tried to come out. They fired on her, and she was immediately killed. They started moving ahead and went to the podium. I had no weapons and no one in the campus had weapons [so as] to preserve the sanctity of the place.. They threw a grenade inside [an exhibition hall]. It exploded and they started firing on the public. Many people were injured. There were many casualties.. People were killed there also. One volunteer opened all the doors to let the people out. So they threw a grenade at the entrance part and did firing also. Maximum casualties were there.. The room was full of blood.
  7. Muslims Of Gujarat-india

    India: Gujarat Massacre Cases Sabotaged Human Rights Watch 01 July, 2003 The ringleaders of massacres committed in 2002 are still roaming free in Gujarat, Human Rights Watch charged in a new report released today. The 70-page report, Compounding Injustice: The Government's Failure to Redress Massacres in Gujarat, examines the record of state authorities in holding perpetrators accountable and providing humanitarian relief to victims of state-supported massacres of Muslims in February and March 2002. Human Rights Watch urged the federal government to take over cases of large-scale massacres where the state government has sabotaged investigations. On June 27, a Gujarat state court acquitted twenty-one people accused of burning alive twelve Muslims in a bakery in Vadodara. Thirty-five of the seventy-three witnesses reportedly retracted in court the statements they had given to the police identifying the attackers. "The government's record on the massacres is appalling," said Smita Narula, senior researcher for Human Rights Watch and author of the report. "Sixteen months after the beginning of the violence, not a single person has been convicted Although the Indian government initially boasted of thousands of arrests following the attacks, most of those arrested have since been acquitted, released on bail with no further action taken, or simply let go. Police regularly downgrade serious charges to lesser crimes - from murder or rape to rioting, for example - and alter victims' statements to delete the names of the accused. Even when cases reach trial, Muslim victims face biased prosecutors and judges. Hindu and Muslim lawyers representing Muslim victims, and doctors providing medical relief to them, have also faced harassment and threats. Hundreds of women and girls were brutally raped, mutilated, and burnt to death in Gujarat. The police have refused to pursue these cases. In numerous instances, and in an effort to cover up their own participation in the violence, the police have instituted false cases against men and women injured in police shootings. Living conditions for more than 100,000 people displaced by the violence continue to be grossly inadequate. For months they resided in makeshift relief camps with little support from the state. By the end of October 2002, the government had closed most of the camps, forcing some families back into neighborhoods where their attackers still live and where their security is continuously threatened. Most people interviewed by Human Rights Watch received negligible amounts to compensate for the destruction of their homes, ranging from a few hundred to a few thousand rupees, or less than one hundred dollars. Hindu nationalist groups continue to arm civilians in Gujarat and many other Indian states. Instead of cracking down on these groups, the Gujarat state Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government has included the distribution of arms as part of its election manifesto. In December 2002, the BJP won by a landslide in Gujarat state elections. Using posters and videotapes of the Godhra massacre, and rhetoric that depicted Muslims as terrorists intent on destroying the Hindu community, the party gained the most seats in areas affected by the communal violence. In states that go to the polls later this year, such as Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh, potentially explosive campaigns are already in full swing. Members of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (World Hindu Council, VHP) are distributing weapons similar to those used in Gujarat, as well as literature depicting Muslims as sexual deviants and terrorists. Members of both communities live in fear that a simple altercation could become the pretext for large-scale violence.
  8. Muslims Of Gujarat-india

    MY COMMENT: The Gujarat Massacre refers to incidents that took place in the state of Gujarat in India in the year 2002 during which the Hindus and Hindu policemen terrorized, tortured, raped , murdered and massacred thousands of innocent and defenseless Muslim babies, toddlers, children, women, elderly people, unarmed men etc. The Gujarat Massacre was planned and execeuted by Hindu politicians and the state government. Human rights groups believe that the death tolls were high, in the upwards of 1000 and up to 2000. The Congress Research Service (CRS) under the U.S. House of Congress, also places the figure at "up to 2000, mostly Muslim".Tens of thousands were displaced from their homes because of the violence. Only after the violence subsided in the month of May did a significant fraction of the displaced returned to the affected regions. Several international news media agencies, governments, non-governmental organizations and human rights advocacy groups such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have reported on the riots. Some of them have referred to the incidents as a "massacre". They have also been critical of the Gujarat government's responses, to the point of alleging their complicity in the riots. Organizations such as Human Rights Watch further critisize the Indian government for failure to address the resulting humanitarian condition of people, "overwhelming majority of them Muslim",who fled their homes for relief camps in the aftermath of the event. Attacks on Muslims In Naroda, according to Human Rights Watch, at least 65 Muslims were killed, many of them women who were sexually assaulted by violent mobs. One of the witnesses stated before the Nanavati commission that that BJP leader Maya Kodnani, Bajrang Dal leader Babu Bajrangi and others had led mobs on February 28 last year in the Naroda-Patia area. A high profile case involved an Ex-Congress MP who was surrounded by Hindu Mobs while many other Muslim residents in the area took shelter in his compound. Ehsaan was believed to have contacted the local police stations, MPs of the area as well as the Chief Minister Modi to save the people from the ever increasing mob. However, no police reinforcement had reached his place and few policemen present were ineffective and unwilling to control the violent mob." Eventually he was burnt to death, along with fifty others. Arundhati Roy, in her articles, made several claims about the details of the situation in Gujarat at the time , particularly regarding the murder of former Congress MP Iqbal Ehsaan Jaffery where she said that his daughters were raped and burnt by a mob which eventually killed at least 150 persons. BJP MP Balbir Punj did not deny the killing of 150 persons in this incident. During the night of 1 March 2002, 14 people, including women and children, were killed. Out of the 14 who died, 3 were Hindus. Despite repeated phone calls to the local police, a police vehicle reportedly only drove by once but none of the police officers took any steps to stop the attack, which lasted through the night. Kausar Bano was nine months into pregnancy when on February 28, 2002, 500 strong armed mob stormed into their house at Naroda Patia. Her womb was allegedly cut open with swords and the fetus was burnt along with herself and 7 other members of her family of 12. Bilkis Yakoob Rasool was six month pregnant when, on March 3, 2002, a mob attacked their house in Randhikpur village located in Dahod district and gang-raped her while killing 14 of her closest relatives. She was left for dead but she survived. During the trial for these crimes , she subsequently identified 20 of the accused including 6 policemen in an ongoing trial. Qutubuddin Ansari is a Gujarati Muslim tailor who made headlines India-wide after being photographed pleading a Hindu mob for his life during the riots. He later left Gujarat and settled in Calcutta, at the behest of West Bengal's ruling CPI(M) government. Role of government and police The Modi led state government was reprimanded at various levels including the National Parliament, Supreme Court and internationally. According to New York Times reporter Celia Dugger, witnesses were "dismayed by the lack of intervention from local police", who often "watched the events taking place and took no action against the attacks on Muslims and their property". The United States Department of State in its International Religious Freedom Report 2003 stated: “ The Gujarat state government and the police were criticized for failing to stop the violence, and in some cases participating in or encouraging it. NGOs report that police were implicated directly in nearly all the attacks against Muslims in Gujarat, and in some cases, NGOs contend, police officials encouraged the mob. The Government dispatched the NHRC to investigate the attacks against Muslims, but the NHRC's findings that the attacks against Muslims "was a comprehensive failure on the part of the state government to control the persistent violation of rights of life, liberty, equality, and dignity of the people of the state," led to widespread criticism in the Hindu community and allegations of government partiality. ” Role of Hindu nationalist organisations Some independent reports have blamed the Sangh Parivar organisations to be responsible for orchestrating the riots. These organisations include the RSS, VHP, Bajrang Dal and affiliated organisations. Some believe the Sangh Parivar launched a campaign against Muslims and to a lesser extent the Christians in Gujarat. The People's Union of Civil Liberties allege that pamphlets were in circulation by the Sangh Parivar which could have ignited the violence further. Peoples Union of Civil Liberties is an Indian Civil Rights group along the lines of the American Civil Liberties Union that enumerated the list of these alleged documents. They also reported that that there are "elements of economic boycott" against the Muslim community in most areas of Gujarat. Reference: ^ "Talibanization" and "Saffronization" in India,hir.harvard.edu ^ Why is Narendra Modi in Wembley?,The Guardian ^ India Shining, Communal Darkness,pucl###### ^ India's Calculated Ethnic Violence ^ Communal violence and nuclear stand-off ^ India in crisis ^ (you are not allowed to post links yet)"http://######fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/61525.pdf"]######fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/61525.pdf[/url] India-U.S. Relations ^ Riot witness names MLA ^ National Human Rights Commission report ^ Gujarat state fails to protect women from violence ^ The tragedy of Bilkis Banu,Rediff###### ^ International Religious Freedom Report 2003. By the United States Department of State. Retrieved on April 19, 2007. ^ 254 Hindus, 790 Muslims killed in post-Godhra riots,Indiainfo######
  9. Mohammad Amin Al-husayni, The Mufti Of Jerusalem

    Mohammad Amin al-Husayni (ca. 1895 - July 4, 1974, Ããíä ÇáÍÓíäí, alternatively spelt al-Husseini), the Mufti of Jerusalem was a Palestinian patriot who struggled to liberate Palestine from the Zionist-Bristish conspiracy. Through the Balfour agreement , the British betrayed Palestinian people by giving Palestine to Zionists. The fact is the British had no right over Palestine. Palestine belongs to Palestinian people since the time is immemorial.
  10. Mohammad Amin Al-husayni, The Mufti Of Jerusalem

    Mohammad Amin al-Husayni (ca. 1895 - July 4, 1974, Ããíä ÇáÍÓíäí, alternatively spelt al-Husseini), the Mufti of Jerusalem was a Palestinian patriot who struggled to liberate Palestine from the Zionist-Bristish conspiracy. Through the Balfour agreement , the British betrayed Palestinian people by giving Palestine to Zionists. The fact is the British had no right over Palestine. Palestine belongs to Palestinian people since the time is immemorial.
  11. Mohammad Amin Al-husayni, The Mufti Of Jerusalem

    Wikipedia is a biased and unreliable website. Just read the followings quotes from the Wikipedia: 1) ' This section does not cite its references or sources.' 2) ' This article or section needs additional references or sources to improve its verifiability. It may be using the words or ideas of other publications in its text, without citing the source(s) of the information. '
  12. Muslims Of Gujarat-india

    Hindu policemen conspired with Hindu terrorists massacring innocent and defenseless Muslims in Gujerat, India. Modi: Architect of Gujarat Genocide. State and Police Complicity May 03, 2002. Hindustan Times (India). Cops admit killing more Muslims Gujarat Police has finally admitted that it killed more Muslims than Hindus in its ostensible attempts to stop what was clearly targeted Hindu violence against Muslims. Of the 184 people who died in police firing since the violence began, 104 are Muslims, says a report drafted by Gujarat Police. The statistic substantiates the allegation of riot victims from virtually every part of the state that not only did the local police not do anything to stop the Hindu mobs; they actually turned their guns on the helpless Muslim victims. September 11, 2003. Indian Express (India). Manoj Mitta.Raped, child & family killed, she’s told take a walk NEW DELHI, SEPTEMBER 10: Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi and his sympathisers will find it hard to dismiss Harish Salve as a ‘‘pseudo-secularist’’ whining over the riots. The former Solicitor-General defended Modi in the Supreme Court when he wanted early elections soon after the violence. And just this week, Salve was the counsel for the Modi government arguing against bail to the Godhra accused. But in a stinging rebuff to the Gujarat government, Salve has refused to appear for it against the National Human Rights Commission in the Best Bakery case which comes up in the Supreme Court on Friday. Instead, Salve has taken up the case of a 22-year-old woman called Bilkis Yakub Rasool, a case which NHRC chief Justice A S Anand referred to him and in which the Gujarat government was put on notice by the Supreme Court two days ago. ‘‘I took up her case because it represents the failure of the system,’’ Salve told The Indian Express, ‘‘the failure of the police and of the courts in Gujarat...When Justice Anand asked me to appear in this matter, I went through the records and decided to fight this injustice.’’ The records tell a horrifying story. Of how a woman, five months pregnant, was raped and saw 14 of her family killed, including her three-year-old daughter. And her two sisters, mother and two brothers. Of how the court closed her case without giving her a hearing— despite a senior police officer putting on record serious ‘‘shortcomings’’ in the investigation. What makes it more compelling is that these records aren’t NGO statements or lawyers’ arguments but official Gujarat police records culled out by the NHRC, in a brief, a copy of which is with The Indian Express. These records say: • On March 3, 2002, Bilkis, then five months pregnant, was on the run with 16family members after violence broke out in their Singwad village in Dahod. Eight women in the group, including Bilkis, were raped in a forest. Bilkis lost consciousness. • When she woke up, Bilkis found she was naked, injured and alone amid the bodies of her relatives. She spent the night in the forest and the next morning she came across a tribal woman who gave her a ghagra to wear. • She then walked up to the road from where she was taken in a police jeep to the Limkheda police station. • It was then that Bilkis lodged an FIR. The police conducted an inquest on March 5 with three independent witnesses who examined the crime scene and recovered seven bodies. The inquest report confirmed, in chilling detail, evidence of rape. • The next day, March 6, she named the accused in a statement recorded before a Godhra magistrate. On March 7, she lodged a second FIR naming three people who she says raped her. • On April 24, 2002, a forensic report confirmed that Bilkis was raped. • Yet, instead of arresting the persons accused by Bilkis and filing a chargesheet, the police submitted a final report to the court in January this year saying ‘‘the offence is true but undetected.’’ • This despite the fact that in November 2002, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Limkheda division, R S Bhagora, pointed out serious ‘‘shortcomings’’ in the case papers. Bhagora noted that the forensic report confirmed Bilkis was raped and yet no medical examination was done of the accused she had named. ‘‘You are directed to take lawful steps against the accused after conducting detailed investigation into the offence.’’ • That didn’t happen. Instead, the police filed a final report in January 2003 telling the court that ‘‘in the absence of any evidence and independent proof against the accused named in the complaint... no action has been taken.’’ • The police claimed that Bilkis had given ‘‘contradictory statements.’’ And that in the first FIR she said she hadn’t been raped. However, in an interview to The Indian Express (see story), Bilkis claims that she did name names in the first FIR itself but the police didn’t record them. That she was raped was subsequently confirmed in the forensic report. • The police also disbelieved the names mentioned by her because they are ‘‘respectable persons in the village.’’ • On March 25, 2003, the magistrate of Limkheda allowed the police to put Bilkis’s complaint in cold storage without giving her a hearing. Hence, a writ petition filed by Bilkis asked the Supreme Court to set aside the magistrate’s order and direct the CBI to investigate the case afresh. The petition also sought a direction to take action against the police officials found to have abused their powers. When the petition came up for hearing on Monday, Salve recalled the law laid down by the Supreme Court in 1996 that in cases of sexual molestation, minor contradictions or insignificant discrepancies should not be a ground for closing the investigation and that conviction can be founded on the sole testimony of the victim. August 18, 2004. Indian Express (India). Stavan Desai. Post-Godhra: Cops shut half the cases AHMEDABAD, AUGUST 17: Among the over 2,000 post-Godhra riot cases to be reviewed by police officers on Supreme Court orders are many cases in which prominent leaders and local policemen have been named. Most cases relate to murder, arson, rioting and illegal possession and use of firearms. The figures, and the grounds given by police for closing cases: • Of the 4,252 post-Godhra cases registered across the state, 2,108 have been closed. z In closing 2,032 cases, police have said that the complaint is correct, but the accused have not been found. z In 55 cases, police have said that the facts stated in the complaint are true but no offence was found to have been committed. z Only in 21 closed cases has the police found the complaint to be false in part or in full. In many of these closed cases, it was police who initiated the complaint and filed FIR. Among prominent cases in which the prosecution hasn’t appealed against acquittal are: • Fourteen Muslims hiding in the fields of Kidiad were massacred on March 3, 2002. A case was filed at Malpur police station, Sabarkantha district. More than 30 accused were acquitted as prosecution failed to establish their involvement. • At Pandarwada, nine Muslims were killed on March 1, 2002. Among those accused — and later acquitted— was Kalubhai Maliwada, a local BJP leader. A year after the acquittal, the prosecution is yet to file appeal. Maliwada is also accused in another case in which more than 80 people were burnt alive in two vehicles . And some cases closed by police are: • Five survivors of the Naroda Patiya massacre had filed an FIR on March 18, 2002, that among those who led the mob that attacked their homes were VHP leader Dr Jaideep Patel and local MLA Maya Kodnani. Police informed the court on September 9, 2002, that the main complainant had stated that he no longer remembers Patel and Kodnani’s presence in the mob. • Himmatnagar PS inspector P.I. Chavda had filed an FIR on March 3, 2002, that a mob of 1,500 had set fire to several Muslim houses. One man was killed. The case was closed on September 23, 2002, on the ground that the accused could not be found. • On March 1, 2002, Vasad police filed an FIR that a mob had attacked Muslims , killing one. The case was closed on August 29, 2002, on the ground that the accused hadn’t been identified.
  13. Unveiling Somali Women

    Muslim women are required by Islam to cover their hairs and body except their face and hands. A true Muslim will not take off women's veils. Only hypocrties take off women's veils and the hypocrites belong to Somalia's US-Ethiopian-backed interim government. And now the hypocrites are cooperating with the Christians of Ethiopia and USA to terrorize innocent and defenseless people of Somalia. And the US and the Ethiopian Armed Forces are using their scapegoat (Al Qaeda) as a pretext to attack and destroy civilian targets and massacre the innocent and defenseless people in Somalia. Most of people of Somalia hate Somalia's US-Ethiopian-backed interim government. Without the US-Ethiopia invention, Somalia's US-Ethiopian-backed interim government will cease to exist.
  14. 6 Men Trying To Attack Army Base

    My comment: Can I ASSUME for the sake of the debates that you are a terrorist too? It just means we're all working on a common ground. Do you like if I ASSUME that you are terrorist?
  15. MY COMMENT: There are so many Christian and Zionist websites on the internet that slander, insult, frame and blame Islam and Muslims because Christians and Christian missionaries are converting to Islam. The websites even twist the teachings of Islam into a lie to demonize Islam and Muslims. It is so pathetic to see the so-called 'priests of the websites' are defeated by Muslims in debates! I quote freeasabird's statement: "Our hospitality has been abused, time to start reclaiming non muslim lands."..........My response: You have forgotten how your ancestors abused the hospitality of native people of America who had kindly helped your ancestors to live in USA when your ancestors reached USA by sailing ships. So it is time now for you to return the land to the native people of America and you can go back to Europe etc.
  16. MY COMMENT: Some Christians are jealous of Islam as the number of Christians converting to Islam is increasing steadily in USA and the Christians are afraid that USA will become a Muslim country. The Christians claim that they respect the religious freedom only to find that they (the Christians) are the ones who try hard to resist Islam. Americans Show Unfavorable Views on Islam By Audrey Barrick Christian Post Reporter Mon, Jan. 08 2007 10:47 AM ET The American Family Association is currently polling Americans on their opinion of Islam as more Americans are converting to be Muslims. The growth of Islam in America is "concerning for a great many people," said Randy Sharp, director of special projects for AFA, according to Agape Press. In terms of politics, most Americans do not believe it would be good for America to have more Muslims in elected offices and most said they would not vote for a Muslim presidential candidate. The Islam and America poll comes as more immigrants in America along with Americans are converting to Islam. Although reports have not pinpointed any sort of trend among Americans converting, a handful of them are becoming more attracted to Islam. "Islam is everything I wanted Christianity to be," said Eric Meek, a Southern Baptist Texan who converted to Islam, according to Dallas Morning News. What does the Voice of America news say about Islam on ? Islam is one of the fastest-growing religions in the United States and Latinos represent one of the fastest-growing minorities. Increasingly, the two trends are meeting in the form of Hispanic converts to Islam. (Source: By Greg Flakus, Voice of America (Dallas, Texas) - 13 July 2005) Converts in the News: Muslim Faithful Fighting Myths That Grew Out of 9/11 By Andrea Robinson, The Miami Herald, February 14 2002 CE ''Sept. 11 forced Muslims to recognize they can no longer hide in the woodwork,'' said Imam Rafiq Mahdi of Masjid Al-Iman in Fort Lauderdale. He said African Americans are in a position to educate the public because, unlike Muslims from South Asia and Middle Eastern countries, they don't fear deportation or detention or that they will be ''construed as being anti-American.'' Both Nuriddin and Madhi have spoken at dozens of venues around Florida -- at colleges, high schools, churches, public symposiums -- to answer questions from not only African Americans, but also Anglos and Hispanics. The Liberty City Masjid also has had an increase in attendance at its Sunday information sessions for non-Muslims, especially among Hispanics. ''We had a lot of opportunities before, but more since Sept. 11,'' Nuriddin said. ''It's given us an opportunity to clarify things about the religion.'' Misunderstandings about Islam are rooted in media coverage of news events, such as the Iranian revolution in the late 1970s and the politics of the Nation of Islam in this country, Madhi said. ''It's looking at Islam through the actions of individuals instead of the teachings of the Koran. We're trying to correct those views,'' Mahdi said. In 1982, there was one black imam and just two Masjids in Miami-Dade County, including Al-Ansar, which was first. Now there are 13 countywide, three with predominantly black audiences. In Broward, there are two African-American imams and 10 Masjids countywide, one of which -- Masjid Tauhid in the Sistrunk area -- is predominantly black. That growth was aided by people moving here from Latin America and the Caribbean -- among them Panamanians, Jamaicans, Haitians and Guyanese. Businessman Shaukath Ali, a native of Trinidad, prayed at home after moving here in 1982 until a friend told him about a Masjid in Pompano Beach. Since then, he and Imam Maulana Shafayat Mohamed have helped establish several Masjids, including Darul Uloom Institute in Pembroke Pines. ''The duty of a Muslim is to make everyone -- Muslim or non-Muslim -- welcome,'' Ali said. ''In Islam, we're Muslim, period. In your heart you abolish the race factor.'' Sofian Abdelaziz, director of AMANA, which helps establish Islamic centers in Florida, said there are 23 Masjids in South Florida and about 150,000 Muslims. Of that number, 20,000 are African American and an additional 10,000 are West Indian, he said. Ilyas Ba-Yunus, a sociology professor at State University of New York at Cortland, said the U.S. Muslim population will reach 7.9 million by this summer, with African Americans making up 32 percent of that number. An additional 6 percent come from the West Indies, Guyana and sub-Saharan African countries. Nationally, African Americans account for the majority of converts in the United States, particularly in the Northeast. Some families are now fourth-generation Muslim, said Aminah McCloud, Islamic studies professor at De Paul University in Chicago. Wayne Rawlins, director of the Miami urban improvement program, Weed and Seed, said he was attracted by the message of one God, the call for modesty and Koran teachings that celebrate equality. He started studying Islam's principles in 1974 at age 16, but didn't formally convert until 1989. ''I considered myself a Muslim when I started reading the Koran,'' said Rawlins, who grew up Presbyterian in New York City. ''The oneness of God was the thing that made sense to me. The concept of the Trinity didn't make sense to my logic.'' Each Sunday, Rawlins joins other men from Al-Iman to go into black neighborhoods to speak with non-Muslims about the religion. The reaction they've encountered since Sept. 11 has changed, he said, not all favorable. CONCLUSION: There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is henceforth distinct from error. And he who rejecteth false deities and believeth in Allah hath grasped a firm handhold which will never break. Allah is Hearer, Knower [Qur'an 2:256]
  17. 6 Men Trying To Attack Army Base

    Comment: How do you know that it is their desire to kill as many soldiers as possible? Did they tell you that or the media and FBI tell you so? You are prejudging them by saying such thing. Please be fair to them and give them a chance to prove their innocence. Is it wrong to the US soldiers? I thinl it is not wrong to kill the soldiers for they belong to the US Armed Forces that are attacking, invading and occupying sovereign countries such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia etc. And the soldiers of the US Armed Forces are attacking and destroying civilian targets such as Masjids, schools, kindergartens, hospitals, farms, villages, towns etc and terrorizing, raping, torturing, murdering and massacring innocent and defenseless people in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia ! The American soldiers should return to USA and mind their own business instead of terrorizing the innocent and defenseless people of foreign countries. Was it wrong for the French people to kill Nazi soldiers who were occupying French? Was it wrong for the Russians to kill Nazi soldiers who were invading Russia? Was it wrong for the Americans to kill Nazi soldiers who were invading Europe? Was it wrong for the German soldiers to kill American soldiers who were invading Germany? Was it wrong for the Korean people to kill the Americans who were invading Korea? Was it wrong for the Vietnamese people to kill the American soldiers who were invading Vietnam?
  18. 6 Men Trying To Attack Army Base

    I quote : ' 6 men charged in plot to attack Fort Dix By WAYNE PARRY, Associated Press Writer Tue May 8, 7:09 PM ET FORT DIX, N.J. - Six foreign-born Muslims were arrested and accused Tuesday of plotting to attack Fort Dix and slaughter scores of U.S. soldiers. ' Now let us compare the news above with the news below: Marine tells of civilians shot to death Los Angeles Times - 2 hours ago From AP. CAMP PENDLETON - A Marine squad leader who led an attack in Haditha, Iraq, that killed 24 civilians shot five men as they stood with their hands up and told comrades to lie about it, a Marine sergeant testified Wednesday. COMMENT: The 6 Muslims did not kill anybody. Buying weapons including M 16, AK 47 etc is a normal practice USA. In fact 70 millions of Americans own guns including the assault rifles in USA. And FBI and the presecutors are the only people who make the statements to implicate the men in the alleged crime. They are prejudging the men by making such accusation against the men. Many Americans also watch violent movies and documentary films in USA. If FBI accused the men of watching violent tapes then all the Americans who watch the violent tapes etc are terrorists too ! The Zionist media make it a top news in USA and feed the news to the World news as a propaganda to slander, frame and blame Muslims and Islam. How can FBI, the prosecutors, and the Zionist media prejudge the men before they are proven guilty beyond any reasonable doubts by a fair and just court? Give them their right to have a fair trial and please don't mislead the public by giving statements that may influence the juries and the public to be unfair to the men.
×