Jump to content
Islamic Forum

saeedalyousuf

Member
  • Content count

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About saeedalyousuf

  • Rank
    Jr. Member

Previous Fields

  • Marital Status
    Married
  • Religion
    Islam
  1. Richard Dawkins, What He Did Fail To Answer?

    (S1: What is the real objective of the human life? -Unknown so far..It can be do what the heart pleases..free will or do exactly what a scripture tells you whether you like it or not) S1a: The atheist failure to know the real objective for the human life does mean that the Real Human Life is not possible without belief in the creator of the universe. S2: (Who can guarantee future existence of the universe and the human life other than the creator of the universe? -Not sure..but by same token..who can guarantee the past , current and future existance of the creator itself?) S2a: The creator of the universe, unlike the creation, is the creator and master of the time and not slave of it. (S3: Can you seriously and honestly believe in the non-guaranteed future? -Does it have to be both serious and honest? if so then no..I can only be honest and honestly yes. Now can you seriously and honestly believe anything whether it make ssense or not just for sake of a guaranteed future?) S3a: For how long, and how? (S4: Why should any one truly devote and commit himself to a non-guaranteed future? -No devotion or delusion required in Atheism.. it's rather lack of a belief as oppose to belief in something..Devotion maybe required when a guaranteed future exists..besides, only without a guaranteed future one can do a truly selfless deed. ex..What's better..you doing good to get to heaven or you doing good for the sake of goodness? ( owned)) S4a: If not devoted to the future then why study in school for tens of years and work for it? (S5: Is it possible for any one that you know to create any functional unit of the universe, i.e., from atoms to galaxies and from viruses to human beings, without knowledge, planning and work? Anything conceived is possible if logical...I'm sure that ten thousand years ago, no one would thought it possible for microchips and cellphones and computers to exist or for human beings to land on moon or do organ transplants. Besides..this functional unit of so called perfect universe currently resemble a failed prototype..-) S5a: Your failure to answer the question does mean that it is not and therefore it is not possible for the universe to come into existence without knowledge, will planning and conscious work. (S6: The Jews, the Christians and the Muslims are the living testimony for the works of the prophets, Mosses, Jesus and Muhammad which was demonstrated by challenging and eliminating the mightiest empires of their times i.e., the empires of the Pharaohs, the Romans, the Byzantinians and the Persians; besides establishing belief in the eternal creator of the universe. What comparable works did the atheists do to prove the credibility of atheism? - In that sense nothing..that's the beauty of it ..Only theists have killed and died and perished to defend their beliefs..Atheists just talk smack..no harm done (Owned again) Possible four Pillars of Atheism..Fast cars,women, boos and music. Now imagine if that wasn't prohibited by any scripture..like heaven on earth) S6a: This means that without the creator of the universe the human beings were to be doomed to slavery under the tyrant criminal corrupt empires forever. (Dawkins shoud pay me for this !!) S: He needs to revive his dead website first: http://richarddawkins.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=90167 Peace S: Can believe in peace without belief in the creator of peace? Saeed H H Alyousuf
  2. Richard Dawkins, What He Did Fail To Answer?

    S6a: Your failure to answer the question means that atheism cannot stand up to such challenge and therefore it cannot possibly a credible alternative to belief. Saeed H H Alyousuf
  3. Richard Dawkins, What He Did Fail To Answer?

    (S1: What is the real objective of the human life? A: There isn't one.) S1a: How do you know? (S2: Who can guarantee future existence of the universe and the human life other than the creator of the universe? A: No one.) S2a: How can possibly believe in anything without belief in the creator of the universe? (S3: Can you seriously and honestly believe in the non-guaranteed future? A: Yes.) S3a: How? (S4: Why should any one truly devote and commit himself to a non-guaranteed future? A: Because they can.) S4a: The question is not if they “can” or not it is “Why”. S5: Is it possible for any one that you know to create any functional unit of the universe, i.e., from atoms to galaxies and from viruses to human beings, without knowledge, planning and work? A: Yes. S5a: Who, where and when? (S6: The Jews, the Christians and the Muslims are the living testimony for the works of the prophets, Mosses, Jesus and Muhammad which was demonstrated by challenging and eliminating the mightiest empires of their times i.e., the empires of the Pharaohs, the Romans, the Byzantinians and the Persians; besides establishing belief in the eternal creator of the universe. What comparable works did the atheists do to prove the credibility of atheism? A: No atheist has ever slaugtered people in the name of his belief, and do not have a litany of death totalling billions.) S6a: You did not answer but did fail to answer my question Saeed H H Alyousuf
  4. Richard Dawkins, What He Did Fail To Answer?

    Since matter is a form of energy and energy is stored work then, combining science with religion, isn't it possible to say that matter is the work of the creator of the universe? Saeed
  5. Richard Dawkins, What He Did Fail To Answer?

    the sad clown (Aug 18 2010, 12:22 AM): S: Well, this means that you cannot "consistently believe in" atheism without belief in "the creator of the universe". Saeed
  6. Richard Dawkins, What He Did Fail To Answer?

    S: What can possibly believe in without the belief in the creator of the universe? Saeed
  7. Richard Dawkins, What He Did Fail To Answer?

    S: These questions expose the incompatibility of atheism with the normal and sound human life. Inability to answer these questions means that atheism lacks the means to confront serious criticsm and accommodate the essential need of the human mind. Saeed
  8. Richard Dawkins, What He Did Fail To Answer?

    Yes, you are right. The questions were posted on the former RDF on Aug 18, 2009 under the topic: "The Six Questions For Richard Dawkins" Sorry, tried to post the link but again it gets blocked. Saeed
  9. The questions posted on RichardDawkins(contact admin if its a beneficial link) on Aug 18, 2009 (I tried to post the link but it was not geting thru): S1: What is the real objective of the human life? S2: Who can guarantee future existence of the universe and the human life other than the creator of the universe? S3: Can you seriously and honestly believe in the non-guaranteed future? S4: Why should any one truly devote and commit himself to a non-guaranteed future? S5: Is it possible for any one that you know to create any functional unit of the universe, i.e., from atoms to galaxies and from viruses to human beings, without knowledge, planning and work? S6: The Jews, the Christians and the Muslims are the living testimony for the works of the prophets, Mosses, Jesus and Muhammad which was demonstrated by challenging and eliminating the mightiest empires of their times i.e., the empires of the Pharaohs, the Romans, the Byzantinians and the Persians; besides establishing belief in the eternal creator of the universe. What comparable works did the atheists do to prove the credibility of atheism? Saeed H H Alyousuf
  10. There Are No Scientific Facts In The Quran

    S1: This is not true. I have already presented the example of the periodic table in the Qur’an. Besides, the well known scientist, Dr. Maurice Bucaille did publish the results of his investigation of a number of scientific facts in his book: The site: witness-pioneer org/vil/Books/MB_BQS/default.htm In his booklet: The site: ymsite com/books/quranmodernscience.pdf Dr. Buccaille states: The scientific facts in the Qur’an that are mentioned by him include: S2: This is a fallacy. We are discussing the Scientific facts are in Allah’s creation and not what is the consequence of the human deeds or misdeeds. S3: They are facts we call them scientific facts because they have been discovered through scientific investigations. Saeed Wa alsalam
  11. There Are No Scientific Facts In The Quran

    Bismillahe AlRahmane AlRahim Correction to my last message to you: S: I have already given an example about the unambiguous reference to the periodic table (which you didn’t deny to be a scientific fact) in the Qur’an. Why then you insist to exclude the scientific facts from the Qur’an? Don’t you think that you are rejecting the following Qur’anic verses: I- 16: 89: 2- 17:89: Wa alsalam aleikum wa rehmatullahe wa barakatahu Saeed
  12. There Are No Scientific Facts In The Quran

    Bismillahe AlRahmane AlRahim . S: I have already given an example about the unambiguous reference to the periodic table (which you didn’t deny to be a scientific fact) in the Qur’an. Why then you insist to exclude the scientific facts from the Qur’an? Don’t you think that you are not rejecting the following Qur’anic verses: I- 16: 89 2- 17: 89: Wa asalaam alaikum wa rehmatullahe wa barakatahu. Saeed
  13. There Are No Scientific Facts In The Quran

    Bismillahe AlRahmane AlRahim S1: The atomic weight of the iron is 57 since it was created and not since people have come to know that, therefore it was a scientific fact before the people did come to know and tell us about that. Though the Qur'an is not specifically a book of chemistry or material science, why then should it give the chapter of iron among 114 chapters the number 57, hundreds of years before the people did even know about the periodic table? Any intelligent person can understand that it is Allah's message to the intelligent educated people of the modern era that since no human being did know about the periodic table fourteen hundred years back then the Qur'an is undoubtedly a divine revelation as declared in 41: 53: THE MEANING OF THE GLORIOUS QURAN By M M Pickthall 041.053 We shall show them Our portents on the horizons and within themselves until it will be manifest unto them that it is the Truth. Doth not thy Lord suffice, since He is Witness over all things ?041.054 How! Are they still in doubt about the meeting with their Lord ? Lo! Is not He surrounding all things ? S2: Though we may not know at present the correct meanings of all of the verses it doesn’t mean they are just allegorical, or that absolutely no one does know their true meaning, or that it is not possible for us to investigate and know that. Saeed Wa asalaam alaikum wa rehmatullahe wa barakatahu. saeedalyousuf
  14. There Are No Scientific Facts In The Quran

    Bismillahe AlRahmane AlRahim. Assalamu Alaikum dear brothers and sisters, S1: What about the periodic table, is it a scientific fact or not? If yes, how do you explain the Qur'anic reference to it: “For the naturally abundant elemental iron there are three stable isotopes with atomic weights of 56, 57 and 58 i.e., the average atomic weight is ?57?, exactly the same as the Qur?anic chapter number named ?Al-Hadid? (i.e., the iron)†you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_messages.yahoo(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/Religion_%26_Bel...35&mid=1349 S2: If you read the Qur'an in Arabic you will note that the word "ayat" in this verse has been translated into verses, whereas it does have other meanings like "signs". Based upon the translation of "Muhkamat" as decisive verses, if you read the verse 11: 1 you will find that all of the Qur'anic verses are decisive verses. Therefore you need to make a thorough investigation of the verse 3: 7 before passing such judgments. Wa asalaam alaikum wa rehmatullahe wa barakatahu. saeedalyousuf
×