Jump to content
Islamic Forum

Ship Wreck

Member
  • Content count

    59
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Ship Wreck

  • Rank
    Full Member

Previous Fields

  • Religion
    Islam

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0
  1. I'm not going to bother with you. You ignore my sources, and then post yours that are selective and anti-american. Until you can actually refute me and prove me wrong correctly, I will not address you. Take that bias out of your head and actually play on a level playing field.Thanks
  2. The Real Terrorist Was Me: Us Soldier

    No, it doesn't kid. I was there. It isn't exactly a free country, but it is NOT a police state. All of your posts have been centered around horrible grammar, assumptions and attacking me and my personality. Your own prejudice indeed limits your intellect. Your whole argument is biased and artificial as per the reasons above. I've already stated my case; talking to you is like talking to a brick wall that can only insult your personality when the brick wall does not even know you. Feel free to have the last reply, but you haven't proven me wrong in any way and you know it.
  3. Well, I did notice that pointing fingers on this forum is what quite a few users do, when the thing they are accusing someone of is usually what they indeed are. Just an observation from about 4 incidents so far. Maybe the brother was in a bad mood, but still, it's best to be respectful. Now, aviv1978, perhaps you can reply back and tell us a bit more about your situation brother.
  4. The Real Terrorist Was Me: Us Soldier

    Nope. I went to Cuba, you didn't call no bluff. YOU provided no info, all you're doing now like I said is directing arrogant shots at me because you can't successfully get your point across. It's up to you to prove what I said wrong. "and that is because you have no unbderstanding of what a police sate is , for if you did you could have listed several , and if you did , you would have never implied that the US and Uk are in any way similar to a police state . In addition , using nazxi germany show you may not have even understood the question ." Again with the assumptions and false accusations. I know what a police state, and here is the definition: Noun <a href="you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?o2=&o0=1&o7=&o5=&o1=1&o6=&o4=&o3=&s=police+state&i=0&h=0#c">S:(you are not allowed to post links yet)"http://"] (n) [/url]police state (a country that maintains repressive control over the people by means of police (especially secret police)) Maybe you should list the several ones then, Einstein. You're obviously the flustered one who's bluff has been called, otherwise you wouldn't appear so frantic in your post, making slight little ad hominems at my intelligence and attributes here and there. How the hell would Nazi Germany show I didn't understand the question, hmm? Nazi Germany was a police state, and a valid example. So was North Korea. If you have nothing valuable to bring to the table, don't bother posting. You're just trying to get a one up on me with accusations and ad hominems and it's not working.
  5. Well, we cannot speculate unless we know for sure, I only know what he said in that video. Annnnnnyways, do you have a copy of the records?
  6. The Real Terrorist Was Me: Us Soldier

    Read what I said buddy, I said I came back from Cuba a while back. Cuba might be authoritarian, but not a police state. Stating so is not true. I think you're just frustrated that I did provide the info, you seem to be awestruck that you can't get your point across to me. The UK is a police state, in major cities there are cameras on every street corner. I don't think I have ever used nazi germany on this forum, not once. And so what if I did? I said it was a police state, get that through your thick cranium. I can use that example if I want to! No need to tell me it does not exist. My history teacher and textbooks taught me that, sport. It seems like all you can muster is bad grammar, attacking the info I have given you, and stating I am wrong. Your allegations are indeed baseless, I advise you to look up the matters for yourself, since you obviously have very limited knowledge of this and you're just trying to win an argument (although you have nothing to offer) on a messageboard now. Boy, you must be flustered!
  7. Alright, check it and post it up here later. Obviously the Taliban were pissed about them doing other work and not helping the children, so they thought it gave them authority to blow up the statues. That is their story. And I never said they were cultural agencies, although they may have been.
  8. Yeah, I agreed with you from the start that it was horrible. I was just saying that there are sources which say that they viewed as "ok". In the video I posted, "Truth behind the Taliban", Mr.Hashami says that the decision to blow up the statues was after a fatwa was issued by the council of scholars. Linking to fixing the statues instead of feeding the children. I never meant that the Red Cross was fixing the statues. I simply said that all I can gather from what he said was that the red cross, UN agencies "from the western world" showed up there, and fixed statues instead of feeding the children dying from malnutrition. I never agreed with what they did and never will.
  9. The Real Terrorist Was Me: Us Soldier

    Right now? North Korea Some believe the UK is closing in on becoming one as well. Nazi Germany was one. There. No need to get your panties in a knot about it, lol, you have your opinion and I have mine. I waited 3 hours at the airport while they searched and detained me. I have American citizenship. I was tanned because I went to Cuba like 3 months ago. There were cameras everything in that airport in Boston and they told me that they pulled me aside because they saw on the cameras I had 'suspicious behavior, and that they were monitoring others as well. Terrorist attacks will increase how far they can ramp up security, admit it. (you are not allowed to post links yet)"you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_timesofindia.indiatimes(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/india/Body-scanners-okay-for-airport-not-for-Parliament/articleshow/5408335.cms"]I don't want no body scanners showing me naked either[/url]. It will get worse, but if it gets really worse, it will spiral quicker and quicker into a modern police state as every aspect of our lives will be tracked and viewed.
  10. The Real Terrorist Was Me: Us Soldier

    There was no bias. In 2009 we saw the rise of a police state in the U.S., and it got worse after thwarted terrorist attacks. I'm not saying they did it, but terror attacks like this do justify, for them, escalating the "war on terror" and introducing stupid security measures: (you are not allowed to post links yet)"you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_you are not allowed to post links yetcbsnews(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/stories/2009/12/29/world/main6033525.shtml"]you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_you are not allowed to post links yetcbsnews(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/stories/2009/12/29/...in6033525.shtml[/url]
  11. How Do You Know Religion Is True?

    Well, I wish you the best. Perhaps it's a test. In Islam we are allowed to think freely and use our minds; I just hope you will come back to Islam one day. I wish you all the best brother. Until then, Salaam Good Luck
  12. No of course I agree with you, it was wrong, but I provided a link where they said they have justification for it. I would never destroy a buddha statue. Seems heartless really.
  13. I dunno, he mentioned the red cross in that video as well as agencies linked to the UN. But that's all he said. I know what they did was wrong. But they had an explanation for it, I guess they wanted to send a message to those agencies to help save child's lives instead of fixing Buddha statues.
  14. See what I mean? Those links must be invisible, but thanks for your excerpt. Yeah, it may be easy to make things up nowadays, I already Knew that, but you're passing off my evidence as simply fabricated while yours is legit. Admit it, you're doing it. My posts were from trusted sources as well, so don't try to pull that on me just so you can win an argument. Thanks :sl: And you're not gullible. You're picking and choosing! Ignoring the factual evidence I provided while saying yours are valid. Things don't work like that. No, they're not. I see no links from before. Lol, like you know me. I hate CNN and fox news. I think you realize that I've cornered you, which like I said for the 4th or 5th time now, is the reason why you say my sources are all fabricated and mostly like made up while your sources are all right and true. You're just trying to win an argument from selective pick and choose articles, while simply passing off the other guys sources as illegitimate. I've seen that before, too bad it makes the other person look more dumbfounded than before. Nobody is going to sue me for anything. I have freedom of speech rights here in Canada, and I'm not hurting anybody.
  15. But of course it's unislamic, as from my point of view, to destroy that out of spite, they still had pretty good reason to do it as children were dying daily from malnutrition.
×