Jump to content
Islamic Forum

Absolute truth

IF Guardian
  • Content count

    858
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Everything posted by Absolute truth

  1. Why Muslims Are The True Followers Of Jesus Pbuh

    How Paul’s personal problem became Corner Stone of Christianity! “when the commandment came, sin sprang to life, and I died. And the commandment which was meant to bring life, in my case brought death.” – Paul By Question Mark Introduction God revealed Laws of the Old Testament (OT) so that its followers could live a successful life in every respect! Over centuries, OT prophets and their followers held high esteem about the benefits of the Laws. However, later, after the ascension of Jesus (peace be upon him), Paul promulgated entirely different concepts about Law. It now had little or no positive providence but a lot of negative implications. Nevertheless, Paul by purporting so breached a lot of divinely revealed verses of the OT. The sad part does not end here – the violations (of OT Laws and verses) became corner stone of Christianity! Thus, it is our intent to bring to light the breaches and request sincere Christians to reconsider whom and what they are following. Pauline Theology: Laws engender Sins If one visits the various “epistles” which Paul has written, he will observe that Paul had little or no consideration for the benefits of the Laws: “Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law. But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.” (Gal 3:21-22, King James Version, e-Sword) In fact Paul unabashedly claims that sins are nourished because of the God-breathed-Laws so much so that without Laws sins are a dead thing (!): “Death gets its power to hurt from sin, and sin gets its power from the Law. But thanks be to God who gives us the victory through our Lord Jesus Christ!” (1 Corinthians 15: 56-57) “For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the promise made of none effect: Because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.” (Rom 4:14-15. King James Version, e-Sword) “If the Law not said, “Do not desire what belongs to someone else,” I wouldnot have known such a desire. But by means of that commandment sin found its chance to stir up all kinds of selfish desires in me. Apart from law, sin is a dead thing.” (Romans 7:7-8) Furthermore, Paul goes out of the way to ironically and absurdly claim that the only reason why God revealed Laws so that “sins would increase” (!): “Law was introduced in order to increase wrongdoing; but where sin increased, God’s grace increased much more.” (Romans 5:20) It is not hard to realize that Paul considered divine Laws to be the very cause of sins amongst humanity. In fact he attributes the functions of Satan upon God’s Laws by (i) claiming that sinful desires are incited by God’s divine Laws (ii) Humans are exposed to the knowledge and temptations of sins but because of Laws (otherwise humans would never have known sins). Consider the following Pauline verses: “For when we lived according to our human nature, the sinful desires stirred up by the Law were at work in our bodies, and all we did ended in death.” (Romans 7:5) “Shall we say, then, that the Law itself is sinful? Of course not! But it was the Law that made me know what sin is. If the Law had not said, “Do not desire what belongs to someone else,” I would not have known such a desire.” (Romans 7:7) Psalmist: OT Laws give success and salvation! However, contrary to Paul’s utter low opinion and incrimination of the OT Laws; OT prophets reasoned that humans can keep away from sins only by following the Laws: “How can a young man keep his life pure? By obeying your commands. With all my heart I try to serve you; keep me from disobeying your commandments. I keep your law in my heart, so that I will not sin against you…I will repeat aloud all the Laws you have given. I delight in following your commands more than in having great wealth. I study your instructions; I examine your teachings. I take pleasure in your Laws; your commands I will not forget.” (Psalms 119:9-16) Notice the rationales of the Psalmist. For him, human can keep their life sin-free only by obeying and practicing the Laws. This is in stark contradiction to the Pauline teaching wherein Paul taught that (A.) sinful desires are stirred up by Laws and (B.) humans knew sins but because of the God-Breathed-Laws!? Furthermore, why would the Psalmist find “delight” in obeying the Laws if it werestirring up sins in him? Was he morally less or was Paul more God fearing (than the Psalmist)? Did not the Psalmist know that Laws stir up sinful desires and therefore, he should not find “delight” in obeying the Laws? Or, was Paul misunderstanding the attributes of Laws? In fact the Psalmist wanted to save the Laws in his heart – the same place where sins were stirred in Paul: “Your teachings are wonderful; I obey them with all my heart. The explanation of your teachings gives light and brings wisdom to the ignorant. In my desire for your commands I pant with open mouth…Save me from those who oppress me, so that I may obey your commands. Bless me with your presence and teach me your laws. My tears pour down like a river, because people do not obey your law.” (Psalms 119:129-136) Notice the longing which the Psalmist has for the Laws. He is panting with open mouth and crying to follow the Laws. If Laws were revealed to “increase wrongdoing” then why was this Psalmist panting and crying to follow such Laws? Moreover, why does he want to obey them with all his heart? Who is compelling him to follow that which stir up “evil desires” and where revealed only to “increase wrong doings”? The answer to all such queries are simple, either of the one – Psalmist or Paul misunderstood the purpose and qualities of the Laws. And in such a situation it is better to bank on the Psalmist who was God’s personally chosen messenger! Moreover, his views are multiply attested by other God’s prophets like Ezekiel, Nehemiah etc. Whereas, on the other hand, we have contemporaries of Paul contravening him! In fact a closer look at Paul’s reasoning clarify that he had personal problems with the OT Laws and not that Laws were “sin inciting” per se as he claimed: “I myself was once alive apart from the Law; but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life, and I died. And the commandment which was meant to bring life, in my case brought death”. (Romans 7:9-10) We saw the providential capacities of the Laws with OT prophets – it was life and salvation giving to them (c.f. Ezekiel 20:11, 33:14-15), however, in Paul’s personal case, “…in my case…” Laws were working backwards. Conclusion With the foregoing factual qualification, is it justified to reject and sneer at God’s divinely revealed Laws, multiply attested by numerous OT prophets; for the personal problems of an individual mortal (Paul)? Before discarding the Laws as a whole, sincere Christians need to rethink: There are God’s divine Laws which were all providential to sincere and purportedly strictest monotheists and they testified towards it so much so that they wanted to follow it with panting mouth and tears in their eyes. How Paul’s personal problem became Corner Stone of Christianity! And all of a sudden we have a mortal (Paul) who declares that Laws worked otherwise in his personal case while his contemporaries who were no less than him,expressed their fealty for the OT Laws and even disputed with Paul over the same! Yet millions of Christians have no qualms in rejecting what was revealed by God to be followed. Sadly, it has become a corner stone of their theology. Notes: All biblical texts, unless otherwise mentioned, are taken from Holy Bible, Good News Edition, Today’s English Version. Emphasize wherever not matching with the original, is ours. https://discover-the-truth.com/2013/11/03/how-pauls-personal-problem-became-corner-stone-of-christianity/
  2. ما هو إسم الإله في المسيحية ؟ نظرة تفصيلية في العقائد المسيحية - من هو الإله في المسيحية : قد يعتقد الكثير من المسلمين ان المسيحيين لهم إيمان قريب من إيمان المسلمين , بل قد يعتقد المسلم ان المسيحي هذا إيمانه مثل إيمان المسلم تماماً ولكن الفارق بينهم فقط نقطة الإيمان بالنبي محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم , فقد يعتقد المسلم ان المسيحي رجلٌ موحد بالله عز وجل ويصلى مثلنا ويصوم مثلنا ولكنه فقط يؤمن بأنه لا نبي بعد عيسى عليه السلام , وأن عيسى عليه السلام هو خاتَم النبيين وإمام المرسلين وان محمد صلى الله عليه وسلم ليس نبي , فيعتقد المسلم ان الفارق بينه وبين المسيحي هي نقطو الإيمان بمحمد صلى الله عليه وسلم فقط لا غير . في الحقيقة هناك إختلاف كبير جدا جدا بين إيمان ومعتقدات المسلم , وإيمان ومعتقدات المسيحي , بل استطيع ان أقول وقلبي مطمئن ان الفرق بين عقائد المسلم والمسيحي كالفرق بين السماء والأرض , والفارق موجود تقريباً في كل شئ مشترك بين المسلم والمسيحي , كالإله مثلاً , فإله المسلمين ليس هو إله المسيحيين , مع ان اي مسيحي قد يقول لك انه يعبد الله كما انك تعبد الله , ولكن في الحقيقة الموضوع غير ذلك تماماً , وأيضاً إيمان المسيحي في المسيح عليه السلام مختلف تماماً عن إيمان المسلم بالسيد المسيح عليه أفضل الصلاة والسلام . سوف نحاول ان نلقي الضوء على أكثر من عقيدة من عقائد المسيحيين بشئ من التفصيل والتبيان حتى يعلم المسلم البسيط مدى فساد العقائد المسيحية , وكي يقول المسلم بملئ فاه " الحمد لله على نعمة الإسلام وكفى بها نعمة " و " الْحَمْدُ لِلّهِ الَّذِي هَدَانَا لِهَـذَا وَمَا كُنَّا لِنَهْتَدِيَ لَوْلا أَنْ هَدَانَا اللّهُ لَقَدْ جَاءتْ رُسُلُ رَبِّنَا بِالْحَقِّ " وتقول وانت مطمئن أيها المسلم " أَشْهَدُ أَنْ لاَ إِلَهَ إِلاَّ اللَّهُ وَحْدَهُ لاَ شَرِيكَ لَهُ وَأَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّدًا عَبْدُهُ وَرَسُولُهُ رَضِيتُ بِاللَّهِ رَبًّا وَبِمُحَمَّدٍ رَسُولاً وَبِالإِسْلاَمِ دِينًا " . فنبدأ ان شاء الله رب العالمين بعرض معتقدات المسيحيين : 1. ما إسم الإله في المسيحية ؟ قد يكون السؤال غريباً ولكن قد يستعجب المسلم عندما يعلم ان هذا السؤال , من أصعب الأسئلة التي قد تواجه المسيحي ! صدقوني هذه هي الحقيقة , فالمسيحي لا يعلم من يعبد ولا يعرف إسمه إلهه , فقد يقول المسيحي في أول مره تسأله فيه عن إسم الإله الذي يعبده , يجيب بسرعة شديدة جدا جدا ’’ الإله الذي أعبده هو الله , وهو نفس الإله الذي تعبده أنت أيها المسلم ‘‘ قد تنطوي هذه الإجبة على اي مسلم عامي ليس له علمٌ في الكتاب المقدس ولكن في الحقيقة , إسم " الله " الذي هو إسم على للإله الذي يعبده المسلمين , ليس له وجود في أصول الكتاب المقدس , أعلم ان الموضوع صعب ولكن ان شاء الله رب العالمين سوف نشرح الموضوع بإستفاضه حتى يعلم الجميع ان المسيحي لا يعلم إسم الإله الذي يعبده وسوف يحتار جدا في معرفة إسمه . قبل أن نبدأ بأي كلام , يجب ان نعرف ان الله عز وجل قد عرّف نفسه بـ إسم " الله " وطلب من البشر عبادتة , سوف نعطي أدلة من القرآن على هذا الأمر ثم ننتقل إلى الجزء الخاص بـ إسم الإله في الكتاب المقدس : ( سورة طه ) ( سورة النمل ) ( سورة القصص ) ( سورة الأنعام ) ورد في موقع الأنبا تكلا حول هذا الموضوع الآتي : [ لفظ "الله" Allah هي كلمة إسلامية، لماذا تستخدمونها؟! وهل لديكم إثبات على وجودها بالكتاب المقدس؟ الإجابة: كلمة الله God أصلاً كلمة مذكورة في الكتاب المقدس، وهو قبل الإسلام. وعدد مرات ذكرها حوالي 2244 مرة، (ستجد النص الكامل للكتاب المقدس هنا في موقع الأنبا تكلا) وللتأكد من أن أصلها من الكتاب المقدس، لك أن تقرأ الآية الأولى من الإصحاح الأول من السفر الأول في الكتاب المقدس، فستجدها به! ومن أسماء الله في الكتاب المقدس "ألوهيم"، وهو أصل الكلمة المشتقة منها.. وترجمات الكتاب المقدس العربية سبقت الإسلام أيضاً.. فقد بدأت محاولات الترجمة للكتاب المقدس إلى اللغة العربية بعد بداية إنتشار المسيحية.. فاللغة العربية ليست من ابتداع القرآن، بل هي مجرد لغة كُتِبَ بها. ] بالرجوع إلى كتب اليهود الموجودة بين أيدينا الآن , ما هو إسم الإله المذكورة في تلك الكتب ؟ للرجوع إلى أول نص في الكتاب المقدس سوف نرى الآتي : Gen 1:1 فِي الْبَدْءِ خَلَقَ اللهُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالارْضَ. ( ترجمة الفاندايك ) هذا هو النص العربي , وجدنا فيه لفظ الجلالة " الله " وأنه هو الذي خلق السماوات والأرض كما عند المسلمين في القرآن الكريم , إذن فاليهود يعبدون نفس الإله الذي نعبده نحن , المسلم يعبد الله , واليهودي يعبد الله , فنحن سواء . في الحقيقة الموضوع ليس بهذا البساطة , لنوجه سؤال بسيط لأي يهودي , هل كُتِب العهد القديم باللغة العربية ؟ بالطبع سيقول لا , وسيقول بالتأكيد ان العهد القديم قد كُتِب باللغة العبرية . هذا الكلام رائع جدا جدا , إذاً فلنتطلع على النص باللغة العبرية ولكن قبل هذا , أريد أن أوضح شئياً مهماً جدا جدا ... الإسم لا يُترجم ,بمعنى ان إسمي محمد أرموش باللغة العربية , فسيكون إسمي باللغة الإنجليزية Muhammad Armoosh وبأي لغة أخرى كانت سيظل إسمي محمد أرموش دون تبديل أو تغيير أو تحريف , هذا أمر بديهي ولكني أذكر فقط , فلا يمكن ان يكون إسم شخص ما " شاكر " باللغة العربية , فيترجم إسمه إلى الإنجليزية " Thankfull " , بل لو ان احد من المترجمين قد قام بالترجمة بهذا الشكل فسوف يجعل من نفسه مناط سخرية . وكذلك الحال في إسم الإله العلم " الله " جل جلاله , إسمه جل وعلى لا يترجم , فمن المفترض مثلاً إذا قمنا بترجمة معاني آيات القرآن الكريم من اللغة العربية إلى اللغة الإنجلية , فالمفترض انه عندما يأتي المترجم ليقوم بترجمة لفظ الجلالة " الله " سوف يترجمة إلى " Allah " لأن هذا الإسم هو إسم علم لإله المسلمين , لا يترجم أبداً , فنرى في هذه الترجمة لمعاني القرآن الكريم من اللغة العربية للإنجليزية الآتي : [ طه:14 ]-[ إِنَّنِي أَنَا اللَّهُ لَا إِلَهَ إِلَّا أَنَا فَاعْبُدْنِي وَأَقِمِ الصَّلَاةَ لِذِكْرِي ] , الترجمة باللغة الإنجليزية كالآتي : Lo! I , even I , am Allah . There is no God save Me . serve Me and establish worship for My remembrance. اعتقد ان ما أريد ان ارمي عليه أصبح مفهوماً الآن . بعد التوضيح , يوف نتطلع على النص مرة أخرى ولكن باللغة العبرية : Gen 1:1 فِي الْبَدْءِ خَلَقَ اللهُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالارْضَ. Gen 1:1 בראשׁית * ברא * אלהים * את * השׁמים * ואת * הארץ׃ اللهُ = אלהים إذن , فالمقابل للفظ الجلالة في اللغة العربية هي " אלהים " وبالطبع انا لا أعلم شيئاً في اللغة العبرية ولكن سوف نسمع سوياً تسجيلاً صوتياً باللغة العبرية لهاذا النص ولكن أذكركم بموضوع ترجمة الأسماء , فمن المفترض ان نسمع في التسجيل كلمة " الله " لأننا قلنا ان الأسماء لا تترجم . سوف تجد العهد القديم باللغة العبرية ومعه مقابله باللغة العبرية مع تسجيلات صوتة باللغة العبريه على هذا الموقع [ A Hebrew - English Bible ] النص سوف يقال مره بالكامل , ثم سوف نعيده مع ترديد المقابل للفظ الجلالة ثلاث مرات http://eld3wah.com/img/ta3reef_pics/gn-1-1-heb.wav بالإستعانة ببرنامج Interlinear Scripture Analyzer - مدقق المخطوطات سوف نفهم كل ما يحدث ان شاء الله رب العالمين طريقة نطق النص بالعبرية : برشيث برا إلوهيم اتث هشامايم فـ إيتا آرتز , brashith bra aleim ath eshmim uath eartz كما هو موجود في الصورة نرى باللون الأسود بالحروف الإنجليزية , كيفية نطق النص باللغة العبرية وباللون الأخضر الترجمة الحرفية من اللغة العبرية إلى اللغة الإنجليزية , نرى بكل وضوح الآتي : אלהים = aleim ( كيفية النطق , إلوهيم ) = Elohim ( الترجمة الحرفية بالإنجليزية ) أين لفظ الجلالة في هذا النص ؟ النص يقول ان الخالق هو إلوهيم , هل يقول المسيحي انه يعبد إلوهيم ؟ نحن لا نعلم من هو إلوهيم هذا ولكننا نعلم الله عز وجل , وليس لدينا خبر من الرسول صلى الله عليه وسلم بأن اسم من أسماء الله عز وجل هو إلوهيم لذا فلا نعترف بهذا الإسم ولا نقدسه , وكما اتفقنا ان الأسماء لا تُترجم , فما الذي وضع إسم إله المسلمين " الله " في الترجمة العربية لكتب اليهود والنصارى الموجودة في الشرق الأوسط ؟ قبل ان نجيب على هذا السؤال المهم , سوف نقرأ نص آخر في العهد القديم لنرى اسم الإله في العهد القديم : Exo 3:15 وَقَالَ اللهُ ايْضا لِمُوسَى: «هَكَذَا تَقُولُ لِبَنِي اسْرَائِيلَ: يَهْوَهْ الَهُ ابَائِكُمْ الَهُ ابْرَاهِيمَ وَالَهُ اسْحَاقَ وَالَهُ يَعْقُوبَ ارْسَلَنِي الَيْكُمْ. هَذَا اسْمِي الَى الابَدِ وَهَذَا ذِكْرِي الَى دَوْرٍ فَدَوْرٍ. Exo 3:15 ויאמר עוד אלהים אל־משׁה כה־תאמר אל־בני ישׂראל יהוה אלהי אבתיכם אלהי אברהם אלהי יצחק ואלהי יעקב שׁלחני אליכם זה־שׁמי לעלם וזה זכרי לדר דר׃ وبالإستعانة مرة أخرى ببرنامج مدقق المخطوطات سوف نعلم الأصول العبرية للنص وهذه ترجمة النص الحرفي باللغة الإنجليزية God said to Moses: 'Thus shalt thou say unto the children of israel: Yahweh, the God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you; this is My name for ever, and this is My memorial unto all generations. في هذا النص , تم ذكر ثلاثة ألفاظ في العبرية ( אלהים - יהוה - אלהי ) : 1. אלהים = الإله : قد تم إستخدام هذا اللفظ بمعنى الإله , مُعرفة بالألف واللام , وهذه نفس اللفظة المستخدمة في النص الأول في سفر التكوين , Gen 1:1 فِي الْبَدْءِ خَلَقَ اللهُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالارْضَ. Gen 1:1 בראשׁית * ברא * אלהים * את * השׁמים * ואת * הארץ׃ الإله وليس الله = אלהים هذه اللفظة باللغة العبرية تستخدم للإله المعرف , " الإله " فالترجمة العربية الصحيحة لابد ان تكون كالآتي : Gen 1:1 فِي الْبَدْءِ خَلَقَ الإلهُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالارْضَ. __________ Exo 7:1 فَقَالَ الرَّبُّ لِمُوسَى: «انْظُرْ! انَا جَعَلْتُكَ الَها لِفِرْعَوْنَ. وَهَارُونُ اخُوكَ يَكُونُ نَبِيَّكَ. Exo 7:1 ויאמר יהוה אל־משׁה ראה נתתיך אלהים לפרעה ואהרן אחיך יהיה נביאך׃ هذا النص أيضاً غير مترجم بالشكل الصحيح , وترجمته الصحيحة هي كالآتي : Exo 7:1 فَقَالَ يهوه لِمُوسَى: «انْظُرْ! انَا جَعَلْتُكَ كالإله لِفِرْعَوْنَ. وَهَارُونُ اخُوكَ يَكُونُ نَبِيَّكَ. والدليل على ان هذه الترجمة العربية التي وضعتها هي الأدق وجود ترجمات إنجليزية كثيرة دقيقة تساند الترجمة التي وضعتها : (American Standered Version) And Jehovah said unto Moses, See, I have made thee as God to Pharaoh; and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. (Darby Bible) And Jehovah said to Moses, See, I have made thee God to Pharaoh; and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet. (Young's Literal Translation) And Jehovah saith unto Moses, `See, I have given thee a God to Pharaoh, and Aaron thy brother is thy prophet; جميع هذه الترجمات موجودة على موقع بوابة الكتاب المقدس BibleGateway.com http://www.biblegateway.com/versions Jehovah said unto Moses, See, I have made you as God to Pharaoh Exo 7:1 فَقَالَ يهوه لِمُوسَى: «انْظُرْ! انَا جَعَلْتُكَ كالإله لِفِرْعَوْنَ. هذه اللفظة ليست خاصة بالإله الحقيقي وقد تستخدم مع غيره والدليل هذا النص : Deu 13:6 «وَإِذَا أَغْوَاكَ سِرّاً أَخُوكَ ابْنُ أُمِّكَ أَوِ ابْنُكَ أَوِ ابْنَتُكَ أَوِ امْرَأَةُ حِضْنِكَ أَوْ صَاحِبُكَ الذِي مِثْلُ نَفْسِكَ قَائِلاً: نَذْهَبُ وَنَعْبُدُ آلِهَةً أُخْرَى لمْ تَعْرِفْهَا أَنْتَ وَلا آبَاؤُكَ ( يطلب منه عبادة آلهة غير الإله الحقيقي ) Deu 13:6 כי יסיתך אחיך בן־אמך או־בנך או־בתך או אשׁת חיקך או רעך אשׁר כנפשׁך בסתר לאמר נלכה ונעבדה אלהים אחרים אשׁר לא ידעת אתה ואבתיך׃ Deu 28:36 يَذْهَبُ بِكَ الرَّبُّ وَبِمَلِكِكَ الذِي تُقِيمُهُ عَليْكَ إِلى أُمَّةٍ لمْ تَعْرِفْهَا أَنْتَ وَلا آبَاؤُكَ وَتَعْبُدُ هُنَاكَ آلِهَةً أُخْرَى مِنْ خَشَبٍ وَحَجَرٍ Deu 28:36 יולך יהוה אתך ואת־מלכך אשׁר תקים עליך אל־גוי אשׁר לא־ידעת אתה ואבתיך ועבדת שׁם אלהים אחרים עץ ואבן׃ __________ 2. יהוה = يهوه : هذه اللفظة باللغة العبرية تستخدم للإسم العلم للإله في العهد القديم , لا تطلق إلا على الإله الحقيقي المستحق للعبادة وإليكم مثال آخر . Psa 83:18 وَيَعْلَمُوا أَنَّكَ اسْمُكَ يَهْوَهُ وَحْدَكَ الْعَلِيُّ عَلَى كُلِّ الأَرْضِ. Psa 83:18 וידעו כי־אתה שׁמך יהוה לבדך עליון על־כל־הארץ׃ Hos 12:5 وَالرَّبُّ إِلَهُ الْجُنُودِ يَهْوَهُ اسْمُهُ. Hos 12:5 ויהוה אלהי הצבאות יהוה זכרו׃ __________ 3. אלהי = إله : هذه اللفظة باللغة العبرية تستخدم لأي إله ولو كان وثن أو إله غير حقيقي وليس شرطاً ان تستخدم للإله الحقيقي المستحق للعبادة . مثال لإستخدام هذه اللفظة مع الإله الحقيقي : Gen 9:26 وَقَالَ: «مُبَارَكٌ الرَّبُّ ( يهوه ) الَهُ سَامٍ. وَلْيَكُنْ كَنْعَانُ عَبْدا لَهُ. Gen 9:26 ויאמר ברוך יהוה אלהי שׁם ויהי כנען עבד למו׃ Exo 4:5 «لِكَيْ يُصَدِّقُوا انَّهُ قَدْ ظَهَرَ لَكَ الرَّبُّ ( يهوه ) الَهُ ابَائِهِمْ الَهُ ابْرَاهِيمَ وَالَهُ اسْحَاقَ وَالَهُ يَعْقُوبَ». Exo 4:5 למען יאמינו כי־נראה אליך יהוה אלהי אבתם אלהי אברהם אלהי יצחק ואלהי יעקב׃ __________ خلاصة الموضوع : لفظ الجلالة عند اليهود هو יהוה = يهوه ولفظة إلوهيم قد استخدمت كلفظ عام لكلمة إله سواء كانت للإله الحقيقي بالتعريف أو بالجمع لآلة أخري أو بأى طريقة أخرى كانت , ولكن نرجع للسؤال الذي تركناه هو : ما الذي وضع إسم إله المسلمين " الله " في الترجمة العربية لكتب اليهود والنصارى الموجودة في الشرق الأوسط ؟ مع العلم ان الأصول العبريه لا توجد فيها لفظ الجلالة . السبب واضح وبسيط جدا جدا , هو لإيهام المسلمين بأن إسم الإله في الكتاب المقدس هو نفس الإله الموجود في القرآن الكريم وان المسيحيين يعبدون نفس الإله الذي يعبدونه المسلمين وأنهم ليسوا كفار وما إلى ذلك من ما يريدون إدخاله في تفكير المسلم البسيط . وأنا صراحة أعتبر هذا تحريف . طيب هذا بالنسبة لليهودي , يعبد إله إسمه يهوه , هل المسيحي يتفق مع اليهودي في نفس إسم الإله ؟ , في الواقع ان مفهوم المسيحي للإله فريد جدا جدا , فهو مختلف تماماً عن مفهوم المسلم للإله ومفوم اليهودي للإله ولا يتفق مع المسيحي لمفهومه للإله إلا الوثنيين , وهذه حقيقة لابد ان يعترف بها المسيحي , فالمسلم يؤمن ان الإله إله واحد ليس معه شريك وليس له ولد , وفي الحقيقة اليهودي ايضاً يؤمن ان الإله واحد ليس معه شريك ولا له ولد , ولكن المسيحي يختلف مع الإثنين , فالمسيحي مؤمن بأن الإله مكون من ثلاثة أقانيم ( ثلاثة أشخاص مستقلين بذاتهم ) وسوف نقوم بالتوضيح : الإله في المسيحية = الآب + الإبن ( المسيح ) + الروح القدس = إله واحد آمين ولا نعلم ما هو إسم هذا الإله , هل إسمه يهوه مثل اليهود ؟ وكيف يعلم المسيحي هذا وليس هناك دليل من العهد القديم ان الإله يهوه هو إله مثلث الأقانيم مثل الإله في المسيحية , فالمسيحيون يقولون بأنهم يعبدون الله , وأن الله مكون من آب وإبن وروح قدس يشكلون إله واحداً . كيف ان الثلاثة يكونون واحد ؟ الله أعلم , والموضوع ليس هذا فحسب , فالمسيحيون يؤمنون بأن : الآب هو الله , إله كامل كُليّ القدرة كُليّ العلم له جميع صفات الكمال والجلال الإبن ( المسيح ) هو الله , إله كامل كُليّ القدرة كُليّ العلم له جميع صفات الكمال والجلال الروح القدس هو الله , إله كامل كُليّ القدرة كُليّ العلم له جميع صفات الكمال والجلال ومع كل هذا فـ الآب + الإبن ( المسيح ) + الروح القدس = إله واحد آمين = الله , بحسب زعمهم والله انه لشئ عُجاب , هذه هي فهمهم عن الله أو عن الإله , صدق ولابد ان تصدق أقول لكل انك لو قلت انك تعبد يهوه مثل اليهود , فاليهود ليس عندهم تثليث وان إسم يهوه لم يُذكر في العهد الجديد بِرُمته , وان قلت انك تعبد الله , فإن لفظ الجلالة الخاصة بإله الإسلام لم يُذكر قط في الكتاب المقدس بالكامل , لا في العهد القديم الخاص باليهود , ولا في العهد الجديد الخاص بالمسيحيين , لذلك نطرح سؤال مهم جدا جدا . ما إسم الإله في المسيحية ؟ وآخر دعوانا ان الحمد لله رب العالمين http://www.ebnmaryam.com/vb/t17954.html
  3. I M New Muslim

    welcome to the forum
  4. John 8:58 is perhaps one of the best verses to disprove the deity of Christ, most Christians simply fail to see the problems with utilizing such a verse and in this article I’d like to demonstrate just how useful the “I AM” statement attributed to Christ is. Let’s first take a look at the verses in question: God said to Moses, “I am who I am. This is what you are to say to the israelites: ‘I am has sent me to you.’” – Exodus 3:14. “Very truly I tell you,” Jesus answered, “before Abraham was born, I am!” – John 8:58. There is something very important to note, we must ask, who is God in Exodus 3:14? The Hebrew from the Westminster Leningrad Codex references God as Elohiym, see here. According to Christian belief, Elohiym can either refer to the Father (God) or the Godhead (all three persons of the Trinity). If Christ is claiming to be the Elohiym of Exodus 3:14 then there exists a major problem. Problem 1: Elohiym consists of the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit of one substance, united by the Godhead. If Christ is claiming to be this Elohiym (the united Three Persons), then he is claiming to be the Father as well as the Holy Spirit. According to Trinitarian dogma, the Son is not the Father or the Spirit. In other words, if Christ is claiming to be the Elohiym (of Three Persons) then he is effectively breaking the rules of the Trinitarian dogma as the Son is claiming to be other persons in the Godhead. Problem 2: If the Elohiym of Exodus 3:14 is the Father alone, then Christ who is the Son is claiming to be the Father and according to Christian Trinitarian belief, the Son is not the Father. Therefore if the Christian is claiming Christ to be Elohiym – the Father, then the Christian is admitting that the Trinity in this case is a false teaching or that Christ did not believe in the Trinity that they appeal to. Problem 3: The Fallacy of False Equivocation. Jack is a boy. James is a boy. Jack is James. Obviously Jack is not James. Orange is a fruit. Apple is a fruit. Oranges are Apples. Obviously Oranges are not Apples. God says I am. Jesus says I am. God is Jesus. Clearly we can see that this is the fallacy of false equivocation. Problem 4: The Christian claims that while the Son cannot claim to be the Father or the Spirit, the Son can claim to be God. For explanation purposes, let’s use a common learning aid which Christians use to explain this reasoning: cc-2014-trinity-diagram However, this makes it worse for the Christian. Consider the following examples: You cannot say that John is an employee in the company, but you can say that John works for the company. You cannot say that Shem and Ham are brothers, but you can say that they have the same mother and father. You cannot say that a banana is a fruit, but you can say that the banana belongs in the fruit basket. Similarly: You cannot say that the Son is the Father or the Spirit, but you can say that the Son is the Father, Son and Spirit. It’s a contradictory claim. The Son is not the Father or the Spirit, yet they believe the Son is the Father and the Spirit unified. Allow the Christian to ponder on this logic and see where it leads them, aid their thinking process by using the other examples provided above. Conclusion: The Christian cannot appeal to John 8:58 without disproving the doctrine of the Trinity by means of demonstrating that Christ himself did not know he could not claim to be the other persons of the Godhead. We can also demonstrate that they are applying faulty reasoning in their argumentation and thus can quickly disarm their frivolous claims. and God knows best. http://callingchristians.com/2014/02/27/the-problem-of-john-858-for-christianity/
  5. Original Sin

    In the Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful. This is a short introduction to the "original sin" concept in christian theology. What is original sin? Although Christianity emphasizes the inherited original/Adam's sin, this principle cannot be traced back to any prophet. No prophet preached it. All prophets emphasized the individual's responsibility for his own words and deeds, as God’s message is the same in its basics with all the prophets. The doctrine of Original Sin basically boils down to this: Everyone has "inherited" this sinful nature from Adam. This sinful nature is going to make humans sin, or is a causative something back of the will. God is going to condemn everyone to Hell for having this sinful nature. Atonement and reconciliation The word atonement is used in Christian theology to describe what is achieved by the alleged death of Jesus. The word was first used in 1526 to translate the Latin word reconciliatio. In the Revised Standard Version the word reconciliation replaces the word atonement. Atonement (at-one-ment) is the reconciliation of men and women to God through the death of Jesus. But why was reconciliation needed? Christian theology suggests that Everybody carries this original sin of Adam with them which separates them from God, just as Adam and Eve were separated from God when they were cast out of the Garden of Eden. The Atonement is that Jesus paid the penalty for the original and other sins of men by his death on the cross of Calvary, and that salvation cannot be obtained without belief in the saving power of his blood. "There is no single doctrine of the atonement in the New Testament. In fact, perhaps more surprisingly, there is no official Church definition either." (http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/christianity/beliefs/whydidjesusdie_1.shtml) Jesus taught that salvation lies in good deeds and faith, but the church states that salvation and success was achieved through crucifixion. The teachings of he who they believe to be the son of God, are not in line with what present day churches preach, the illogicality and inconsistency of their faith is obvious. Original sin is an Augustine Christian doctrine that says that everyone is born sinful. The root of Christianity is the original sin upon which the crucifixion is justified and used for the benefit of Christians. Like trinity, Jesus never said I would be crucified for Adam's sin nor did he said that children are born sinful. None of these are found in the entire Bible. The concept of Original Sin was explained in depth by St Augustine and formalised as part of Roman Catholic doctrine by the Councils of Trent in the 16th Century. Getting rid of original sin The way a person can 'cleanse' their soul from sin is to accept that Christ's death on the cross atoned for this sin to be baptised. Many Christians who profess to believe in the doctrine of original sin do not know what it teaches. Even more Christians are ignorant of its history and origin.
  6. Original Sin

    1 min. response by Sheikh Ahmed Deedat to alleged original sin, crucifixion and Jesus sacrifice!
  7. Disgusting - A decision by a French school to bar Muslim from classes for wearing long skirt has sparked outrage among the Muslim community, after the head teacher insisted the outfit was too openly religious. The skirt was “nothing special, it’s very simple, there’s nothing conspicuous. There is no religious sign whatsoever,” the student, identified as Sarah told L’Ardennais, Agence France Presse (AFP) reported on Tuesday, April 28. Sarah has been banned from class twice this month by the head teacher who claimed that the long skirt “conspicuously” showed religious affiliation. “The girl was not excluded, she was asked to come back with a neutral outfit and it seems her father did not want the student to come back to school,” local education official Patrice Dutot said. According to the official, Sarah used to take off her hijab before entering the school premises in the north-eastern town of Charleville-Mezieres. The school decision has sparked anger among French, with the hashtag #JePorteMaJupeCommeJeVeux, translated into English as “I wear my skirt as I please” that has been trending since its launch. “If it’s worn by a ‘white’ person, it’s hippy chic, if it’s a Muslim, it becomes conspicuous,” one user tweeted. On the other hand, the regional education office backed the school decision, saying that the outfit could have been part of a concerted “provocation.” “When it comes to concerted protest actions by students, which follow other more visible incidents linked for instance to wearing the veil, the secular framework for education must be firmly reminded and guaranteed,” regional education office said in a statement. Sarah's case is not the first in France. Last year, around 130 students were barred from classes for their religious outfits, according to the CCIF Islamophobia watch. "Wearing a long skirt is nothing ostentatious. This is more due to mass hysteria," said Abdallah Zekri, President of the National Observatory against Islamophobia, the Local reported. France is home to a Muslim community of nearly six million, the largest in Europe. French Muslims have been complaining of restrictions on performing their religious practices. In 2004, France banned Muslims from wearing hijab, an obligatory code of dress, in public places. Several European countries followed the French example. France also outlawed the wearing of face-veil in public in 2011. http://islamstory.com/en/french-student-kicked-out-long-skirt
  8. When Did Adam And Eve Exist?

    No one knows exactly. Allah knows best.
  9. What Does The Quran Mean?

    8:12-13 Recall that your Lord inspired the angels: "I am with you; so support those who believed. I will throw terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved. You may strike them above the necks, and you may strike even every finger." This is what they have justly incurred by FIGHTING God and His messenger. For those who fight against God and His messenger, God's retribution is severe. The story is mentioned in "Sahih Muslim": It has been narrated on the authority of 'Umar b. al-Khattab who said: When it was the day on which the Battle of Badr was fought, the Messenger of God (may peace be upon him) cast a glance at the infidels, and they were one thousand while his own Companions were three hundred and nineteen. The Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) turned (his face) towards the Qibla Then he stretched his hands and began his supplication to his Lord: "O God, accomplish for me what Thou hast promised to me. O God, bring about what Thou hast promised to me. O God, if this small band of Muslims is destroyed. Thou will not be worshipped on this earth." He continued his supplication to his Lord, stretching his hands, facing the Qibla, until his mantle slipped down from his shoulders. So Abu Bakr ( his favourate companion )came to him, picked up his mantle and put it on his shoulders. Then he embraced him from behind and said:. Prophet of Allah, this prayer of yours to your Lord will suffice you, and He will fulfil for you what He has promised you. So Allah, the Glorious and Exalted, revealed (the Qur'anic verse): "When ye appealed to your Lord for help, He responded to your call (saying): I will help you with one thousand angels coming in succession." So God helped him with angels. While on that day a Muslim was chasing a disbeliever who was going ahead of him, he heard over him' the swishing of the whip and the voice of the rider saying: Go ahead, Haizi'm ! He glanced at the polytheist who had (now) fallen down on his back. When he looked at him (carefully he found that) there was a scar on his nose and his face was torn as if it had been lashed with a whip, and had turned green with its poison. An Ansari came to the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) and related this (event) to him. He said: You have told the truth. This was the help from the third heaven. The Muslims that day (i.e. the day of the Battle of Badr) killed seventy persons and captured seventy. Also, the previously mentioned laws of Jihad all applied here and the Muslims were commanded: وَإِن جَنَحُوا لِلسَّلْمِ فَاجْنَحْ لَهَا وَتَوَكَّلْ عَلَى اللَّـهِ ۚ إِنَّهُ هُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْعَلِيمُ ﴿٦١﴾ 8:61 But if the enemy incline towards peace, do thou (also) incline towards peace, and trust in God: for He is One that hears and knows (all things). Furthermore, Believing in a punishment for oppressive disbelievers delivered by the unseen angels is hardly different from believing in an unseen punishment in the next life. BTW; ISIS doesn't misinterpret this ayah, It's only ignorant anti-islamic haters who do.
  10. Why Should I Believe In Muhammed?

    It is an Islamic viewpoint that for every nation was sent a Messenger for their guidance. The important matter was the concept of Tawheed i.e., in oneness of Allah. The secondary matter was Shariah which kept changing from tribe to tribe and nation to nation. Allah, the most high, alone knows what is good for His creation. As it is mentioned in the Qur'ân: And for every Ummah (a community or a nation), there is a Messenger; when their Messenger comes, the matter will be judged between them with justice, and they will not be wronged. (Qur'ân 10:47) And verily, We have sent among every Ummah (community, nation) a Messenger (proclaiming): "Worship Allah (Alone), and avoid (or keep away from) Taghut (all false deities, etc. i.e., do not worship Taghut besides Allah)." Then of them were some whom Allah guided and of them were some upon whom the straying was justified. So travel through the land and see what was the end of those who denied (the truth). (Qur'ân 16:36) "We sent not an apostle except (to teach) in the language of his (own) people, in order to make (things) clear to them. Now God leaves straying those whom He pleases and guides whom He pleases: and He is Exalted in power, full of Wisdom. (The Noble Quran, 14:4)" Some of these Messengers are mentioned in the Qur'ân by Allah and some of them are not as the Qur'ân says: And, indeed We have sent Messengers before you (O Muhammad(P)); of some of them We have related to you their story and of some We have not related to you their story, and it was not given to any Messenger that he should bring a sign except by the Leave of Allah. So, when comes the Commandment of Allah, the matter will be decided with truth, and the followers of falsehood will then be lost. (Qur'ân 40:78) Have a look here; https://islamicnafahat.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/all-prophets-were-muslims/ http://www.islamreligion.com/articles/10228/prophets-of-quran/
  11. Why Should I Believe In Muhammed?

    The result is irrelevant to the premise. The Arabs were fresh, and ready for a Prophet. Sending another Prophet to the Jews after Jesus peace be upon him would have been useless, because sons of israel used to kill prophets. : "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those sent to you, how often I have longed to gather your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing. (From the NIV Bible, Matthew 23:37)" Noble Qur'aan defines the mission of Jesus (peace be upon him), as follows: a.. To confirm (the laws) that already existed even before his arrival, from the Torah (in the Old Testament) ; (Noble Quran 61:6) b.. To give the good news (the gospel) of the arrival of a messenger, who comes after him, whose name will be 'Ahmad' (another name of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). (Noble Quran 61:6) c.. To teach the Children of israel, unto whom he was sent, matters of wisdom ; (Noble Quran 43:63) d.. To clarify certain matters in which they (Jews) differed ; (Noble Quran 43:63) and e.. To legitimize certain things that were earlier banned for them. (Noble Quran 3:50) God has sent different prophets to different peoples. Jesus was one of these national prophets. He was the Messiah of the israelites. The mission of Jesus was only for the children of israel, but the Prophet Muhammad came with a message for all nations of the earth. Jesus clearly stated: "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of israel."(Matthew l5:24) On the other hand, the Prophet Muhammad from the very beginning of his ministry addressed himself to the entire humanity. It was revealed to him: (We have not sent thee (Muhammad) but as a mercy to all the nations.) (Qur'an 21:107) (Say (O Muhammad): O mankind! Lo! I am the Messenger of God to you all - the Messenger of Him unto Whom belongeth the sovereignty of the heavens and the earth. There is no god save Him.) (Qur'an 7: 158) People of the book used to say to the Arab polytheists, "A Prophet shall be sent just before the end of this world and we, along with him, shall exterminate you, just as the nations of `Ad and Iram were exterminated.'' Also, Muhammad bin Ishaq narrated that Ibn `Abbas said, "The Jews used to invoke Allah (for the coming of Muhammad ) in order to gain victory over the Aws and Khazraj, before the Prophet was sent. When Allah sent him to the Arabs, they rejected him and denied what they used to say about him. Hence, Mu`adh bin Jabal and Bishr bin Al-Bara' bin Ma`rur, from Bani Salamah, said to them, `O Jews! Fear Allah and embrace Islam. You used to invoke Allah for the coming of Muhammad when we were still disbelievers and you used to tell us that he would come and describe him to us,' 90. How bad is that for which they have sold their own selves, that they should disbelieve in that which Allah has revealed (the Qur'an), grudging that Allah should reveal of His grace unto whom He wills of His servants. So they have drawn on themselves wrath upon wrath. And for the disbelievers, there is disgracing torment.) http://www.qtafsir.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=347 http://www.quran-m.com/firas/en1/index.php/historical/483-the-witnesses-of-the-early-jews-to-the-prophethood-of-muhammad.html Islam is the religion of all prophets. There is no racism in Islam.
  12. لو أن رُصاصةً مثلَ هذه - وأشار إلى مثلِ الجمجمةِ - أُرسلتْ من السماءِ إلى الأرضِ هي مسيرةُ خَمسمائةِ سنةٍ، لبلغتِ الأرضَ قبلَ الليلِ، ولو أنها أُرسلتْ من رأسِ السلسلةِ لسارتْ أربعين خريفًا الليلَ والنهارَ قبلَ أن تبلُغَ أصلَها أو قعرَها. الراوي : عبدالله بن عمرو | المحدث : الألباني | المصدر : ضعيف الترمذي الصفحة أو الرقم: 2588 | خلاصة حكم المحدث : ضعيف
  13. Fossils, "proof" Of Evolution ?!

    Definitions: Fossils (from Latin fossus, literally "having been dug up") الحفرية are the preserved remains or traces of animals , plants, and other organisms from the remote past. Fossil record,السجل الحفري history of life as documented by fossils, the remains or imprints of the organisms from earlier geological periods preserved in sedimentary rock. Paleontology or palaeontology علم المتحجرات أو الأحياء القديمة أو المستحاثات is the scientific study of prehistoric life. Archaeology, or archeology علم الآثار(from Greek "ancient"), is the study of human activity in the past, primarily through the recovery and analysis of the material culture and environmental data that they have left behind, which includes artifacts, architecture, biofacts and cultural landscapes (the archaeological record). Geochronology التاريخ الجيولوجي is the science of determining the age of rocks, fossils, and sediments Anthropology علم الإنسان is the "science of humanity." Uniformitarianism is the assumption that the same natural laws and processes that operate in the universe now, have always operated in the universe in the past and apply everywhere in the universe. Phyletic gradualism is a model of evolution which theorizes that evolution occurs through the accumulation of slight modifications over long periods of time. Punctuated Equilibrium is a theory to explain the absence of transitional forms in the fossil record, which are predicted by Darwinian evolution, It proposes that most species will exhibit little net evolutionary change for most of their geological history, remaining in an extended state called stasis. When significant evolutionary change occurs, the hypothesis proposes that it is generally restricted to rare and geologically rapid events of branching speciation called cladogenesis. Cladogenesis is thought to be the process by which a species splits into two distinct species, rather than one species gradually transforming into another.
  14. The Trinity

  15. I Want To Knows About Czech Republic Muslims

    wa alaikum assalam There are no reliable figures as to how many Muslims really live in the Czech Republic. Mohamed Ali Šilhavý (interviewed by the BBC Czech Service, September 20, 2001) estimated the numbers at about 20,000 Muslims in the Czech Republic, among whom some 400 could be native Czechs. The number of converts seems to grow, and probably as many as 80% of them are women, which more completely adopt cultural patterns (not only the basic faith as such).. So far, no celebrity converts to Islam are known in the Czech Republic although it is noteworthy that at least two prominent Czech Orientalists of the Communist era were secret Muslims (a professed Islamic adherence is certain of old-generation Mideast scholars Ivan Hrbek and Jiøí Beèka at their young age; Czech Muslim author Petr Pelikán has academic education in Arab and Oriental studies; finally, going back to earlier generations, some speculate that Felix Tauer, who has translated the Thousand and One Nights into Czech, may have been a Muslim secretly). As for the non-Czech Muslims who live in the country, most of them are Arabs (see above), apparently followed by Afghans, sub-Saharan Africans, Pakistanis, refugees from Bosnia- Herzegovina, and people from the Central Asian and Caucasian republics of the former Soviet Union. Turks, Persians, and Kurds are relatively very few in the Czech Republic. MAINSTREAM MUSLIM ORGANIZATIONS Ústøedí muslimských obcí (Main Office of Muslim Associations) – officially registered as a religious community on September 17, 2004, which gives Islam in the Czech Republic an institutional recognition and entitles the community to state subsidies. (To a limited extent, it can also work in Czech prisons with Muslim inmates. However, the community has not fulfilled the general requirements for other activities based on religion, such as teaching Islam in schools or holding marriage ceremonies recognized by government.) The government-registered Main Office of Muslim Associations serves as an umbrella platform of the following organizations: 1) Islámská nadace v Praze (Islamic Foundation in Prague); 2) Islámská nadace v Brnì (Islamic Foundation in Brno - the second-largest city in the Czech Republic); 3) Všeobecný svaz muslimských studentù (General Union of Muslim Students, or, the name they use on their website is: the Muslim Student Union). The joint platform can be labelled (at least in administrative terms) as the "mainstream Islam" in the Czech Republic. The president of the Main Office of Muslim Associations is Mohamed Ali Šilhavý, a native Czech who is now 90 years old, and a Muslim since he was 20. Also due to his advanced age, the Main Office is mostly represented by its two vice-presidents: one of them is Vladimír Sáòka, again a native Czech convert to Islam who leads the Islamic Foundation in Prague; the other vice-president is an Iraqi Arab by origin whose name is Munib Hasan al-Rawi (transcriptions used by himself or in the media seem to vary, and probably the most common form is Muneeb Hassan). The latter man represents a typical model of an Arab having come to former Czechoslovakia for university studies, later deciding to remain in the country after he graduated. Mr. al-Rawi leads the Islamic Foundation in Brno. Outside the officially registered platform stand two bodies with a status of civil associations that, however, also pursue religious activities. Yet in terms of media activities, the latter of the organizations is far from marginal: 1) Svaz islámských kulturních center v Praze (Union of Islamic Cultural Centres in Prague) – purely Turkish in membership; related to the worlwide network of "Islamic cultural centres" financed from Turkey; 2) Muslimská unie (Muslim Union) – officially established on January 20, 2001. Although kept mostly by native Czech converts to Islam, the leader of the Union is one Muhammad Abbas al-Mu'tasim (transcriptions used by himself or in the media seem to vary, and probably the most common forms are Mohamed Abbás and Mohamad Abbás), again an example of an Arab who settled in the Czech Republic after his university graduation here. He comes from the Sudan and is a son of a Sudanese diplomat. The Union is highly active in publications on the internet, where it has also paid an extraordinary attention to the events of September 11, 2001. Mr.Abbas´s connection to Third World Relief Agency, notorious jihadist organisation, are well documented. Mr.Abbas aplied by the Czech Court for oficiálù recognition of TWRA already in 1996. Look here: http://www.islamawareness.net/Europe/Czech/czech_article0002.html http://www.islamawareness.net/Europe/Czech/
  16. University of Birmingham: A Qur’an manuscript held by the University of Birmingham has been placed among the oldest in the world thanks to modern scientific methods. Radiocarbon analysis has dated the parchment on which the text is written to the period between AD 568 and 645 with 95.4% accuracy. The test was carried out in a laboratory at the University of Oxford. The result places the leaves close to the time of the Prophet Muhammad, who is generally thought to have lived between AD 570 and 632. Quran 7th century 1 Cadbury Research LibraryResearchers conclude that the Qur’an manuscript is among the earliest written textual evidence of the Islamic holy book known to survive. This gives the Qur’an manuscript in Birmingham global significance to Muslim heritage and the study of Islam. Susan Worrall, Director of Special Collections (Cadbury Research Library), at the University of Birmingham, said: ‘The radiocarbon dating has delivered an exciting result, which contributes significantly to our understanding of the earliest written copies of the Qur’an. We are thrilled that such an important historical document is here in Birmingham, the most culturally diverse city in the UK.’ The Qur’an manuscript is part of the University’s Mingana Collection of Middle Eastern manuscripts, held in the Cadbury Research Library. Funded by Quaker philanthropist Edward Cadbury, the collection was acquired to raise the status of Birmingham as an intellectual centre for religious studies and attract prominent theological scholars. Consisting of two parchment leaves, the Qur’an manuscript contains parts of Suras (chapters) 18 to 20, written with ink in an early form of Arabic script known as Hijazi. For many years, the manuscript had been misbound with leaves of a similar Qur’an manuscript, which is datable to the late seventh century. Susan Worrall said: ‘By separating the two leaves and analysing the parchment, we have brought to light an amazing find within the Mingana Collection.’ Dr Alba Fedeli, who studied the leaves as part of her PhD research, said: ‘The two leaves, which were radiocarbon dated to the early part of the seventh century, come from the same codex as a manuscript kept in the Bibliothèque Nationale de France in Paris.’ ‘According to Muslim tradition, the Prophet Muhammad received the revelations that form the Qur’an, the scripture of Islam, between the years AD 610 and 632, the year of his death. At this time, the divine message was not compiled into the book form in which it appears today. Instead, the revelations were preserved in “the memories of men”. Parts of it had also been written down on parchment, stone, palm leaves and the shoulder blades of camels. Caliph Abu Bakr, the first leader of the Muslim community after Muhammad, ordered the collection of all Qur’anic material in the form of a book. The final, authoritative written form was completed and fixed under the direction of the third leader, Caliph Uthman, in about AD 650. ‘Muslims believe that the Qur’an they read today is the same text that was standardised under Uthman and regard it as the exact record of the revelations that were delivered to Muhammad. ‘The tests carried out on the parchment of the Birmingham folios yield the strong probability that the animal from which it was taken was alive during the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad or shortly afterwards. This means that the parts of the Qur’an that are written on this parchment can, with a degree of confidence, be dated to less than two decades after Muhammad’s death. These portions must have been in a form that is very close to the form of the Qur’an read today, supporting the view that the text has undergone little or no alteration and that it can be dated to a point very close to the time it was believed to be revealed.’ Dr Muhammad Isa Waley, Lead Curator for Persian and Turkish Manuscripts at the British Library, said: ‘This is indeed an exciting discovery. We know now that these two folios, in a beautiful and surprisingly legible Hijazi hand, almost certainly date from the time of the first three Caliphs. According to the classic accounts, it was under the third Caliph, Uthman ibn Affan, that the Qur’anic text was compiled and edited in the order of Suras familiar today, chiefly on the basis of the text as compiled by Zayd ibn Thabit under the first Caliph, Abu Bakr. Copies of the definitive edition were then distributed to the main cities under Muslim rule. ‘The Muslim community was not wealthy enough to stockpile animal skins for decades, and to produce a complete Mushaf, or copy, of the Holy Qur’an required a great many of them. The carbon dating evidence, then, indicates that Birmingham’s Cadbury Research Library is home to some precious survivors that – in view of the Suras included – would once have been at the centre of a Mushaf from that period. And it seems to leave open the possibility that the Uthmanic redaction took place earlier than had been thought – or even, conceivably, that these folios predate that process. In any case, this – along with the sheer beauty of the content and the surprisingly clear Hijazi script – is news to rejoice Muslim hearts.’ http://www.muslimnews.co.uk/news/uk/birmingham-quran-manuscript-dated-among-the-oldest-in-the-world/ http://callingchristians.com/2015/07/22/understanding-the-birmingham-universitys-find-of-the-oldest-quranic-manuscripts/
  17. Allah (God) Forbids Pork.

    15 Things You Should Know About Pigs: 1) A pig is a real garbage gut. It will eat anything including urine, excrement, dirt, decaying animal flesh, maggots, or decaying vegetables. They will even eat the cancerous growths off other pigs or animals. 2) The meat and fat of a pig absorbs toxins like a sponge. Their meat can be 30 times more toxic than beef or venison. 3) When eating beef or venison, it takes 8 to 9 hours to digest the meat so what little toxins are in the meat are slowly put into our system and can be filtered by the liver. But when pork is eaten, it takes only 4 hours to digest the meat. We thus get a much higher level of toxins within a shorter time. 4) Unlike other mammals, a pig does not sweat or perspire. Perspiration is a means by which toxins are removed from the body. Since a pig does not sweat, the toxins remain within its body and in the meat. 5) Pigs and swine are so poisonous that you can hardly kill them with strychnine or other poisons. 6) Farmers will often pen up pigs within a rattlesnake nest because the pigs will eat the snakes, and if bitten they will not be harmed by the venom. 7) When a pig is butchered, worms and insects take to its flesh sooner and faster than to other animal's flesh. In a few days the swine flesh is full of worms. Swine and pigs have over a dozen parasites within them, such as tapeworms, flukes, worms, and trichinae. There is no safe temperature at which pork can be cooked to ensure that all these parasites, their cysts, and eggs will be killed. 9) Pig meat has twice as much fat as beef. A 3 oz T bone steak contains 8.5 grams of fat; a 3 oz pork chop contains 18 grams of fat. A 3 oz beef rib has 11.1 grams of fat; a 3 oz pork spare rib has 23.2 grams of fat. 10) Cows have a complex digestive system, having four stomachs. It thus takes over 24 hours to digest their vegetarian diet causing its food to be purified of toxins. In contrast, the swine's one stomach takes only about 4 hours to digest its foul diet, turning its toxic food into flesh. 11) The swine carries about 30 diseases which can be easily passed to humans. This is why God commanded that we are not even to touch their carcase (Leviticus 11:8). 12) The trichinae worm of the swine is microscopically small, and once ingested can lodge itself in our intestines, muscles, spinal cord or the brain. This results in the disease trichinosis. The symptoms are sometimes lacking, but when present they are mistaken for other diseases, such as typhoid, arthritis, rheumatism, gastritis, MS, meningitis, gall bladder trouble, or acute alcoholism. 13) The pig is so poisonous and filthy, that nature had to prepare him a sewer line or canal running down each leg with an outlet in the bottom of the foot. Out of this hole oozes pus and filth his body cannot pass into its system fast enough. Some of this pus gets into the meat of the pig. 14) According to Jewish law, pork is one of a number of foods forbidden from consumption by Jews. These foods are known as "non-kosher" foods. In order for a meat to be kosher, it must first come from a kosher animal. A kosher animal must be a ruminant and have split hooves - therefore cows, sheep, goats and deer are all kosher, whereas camels and pigs (having each only one sign of kashrut) are not kosher. 15) Quran, Holy book of Muslims also prohibits consumption of pork. "He has made unlawful for you that which dies of itself and blood and the flesh of swine and that on which the name of any other than Allah has been invoked. But he who is driven by necessity, being neither disobedient nor exceeding the limit, then surely, Allah is Most Forgiving, Merciful." Quran 2:173 I cannot understand why anyone would eat it. You might as well vacuum all day and then take the vacuum bag and make a nice soup out of it. " Of course our Creator has given us the health laws through the Holy Quran and not eating pigs is even CLEARLY mentioned in the Bible (Leviticus 11:07) But some humans think they are more intelligent than the Creator so they choose.
  18. Islam In Greece

    Not One Masjid In Athens – Muslims Pray In Garages There is not a single Masjid in Athens. “There is no place in Athens that is legal. Not one. So yeah, we do our prayers in a garage.” What would you do if you and your community had to go underground – literally – to find a place to pray? An estimated 300,000 Muslims live in Athens. But because of the Greek Orthodox Church’s influence and growing anti-immigrant sentiment, it is the only European capital without an official Masjid. As the far-right Golden Dawn party has gained currency since the 2008 financial crisis, Muslim immigrants have been attacked and murdered, and unofficial Masjids have been targeted. With so much hatred in the air, will an official Masjid ever be built? Here’s the full story on the perils of being Muslim in modern Athens:
  19. Ramadan Kareem!

    Dua' for the new crescent of Ramadan;
  20. Matthew 13 presents a very peculiar problem for Christianity, in verse 10-11 it says: The disciples came to him and asked, “Why do you speak to the people in parables?” He replied, “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them.” From this, we learn that the masses were not able to understand Jesus when he spoke, apparently only those who were given the secrets of the kingdom of heaven would be able to understand what Jesus was saying. Who was given that knowledge? Just the twelve disciples. Therefore, according to the New Testament, Jesus went around preaching unintelligible sermons to masses of people (cf. Matthew 13:2, John 6:60), when the only people who could have possibly understood him were only the twelve because they possessed the “secret knowledge”. This however, is a compounded problem, as the secret knowledge (of the kingdom of heaven) that unlocked Jesus’ unintelligible sermons, didn’t seem to work. On more than one occasion the disciples had to stop Jesus and ask him to speak intelligibly to them: “The disciples did not understand any of this. Its meaning was hidden from them, and they did not know what he was talking about.” – Luke 18:34. So let’s recap. Jesus speaks unintelligibly to the masses. Of the masses, 12 disciples have the “secret knowledge (of the kingdom of heaven)” which would enable them and only them to understand what Jesus was saying. Of these twelve, none of them understood what Jesus was saying according to Luke 18:34, because the meaning of what Jesus was saying was hidden from them. What this means is that Jesus did a lot of talking to a lot of people and no one was able to understand what he was saying. To explain this Monthy Python-esque scenario, I’ve developed a parable of my own: Sam is a wealthy king. He called his entire kingdom together and said to the large crowd before him, that behind that door there was a million gold coins. He then invited the crowd to open the door. The crowd rushed to the door and tried opening it. The door was locked! Sam approached his close friends and said, “to unlock the door you need a secret key, I will give each of you a secret key so you may enter the room with a million goal coins!” What Sam did not tell them, was that they keys were fake and would not work. Sam’s friends ran to the door and each of them tried their keys, none of the keys were able to open the door. David, one of Sam’s friends returns to him and says that the keys are not unlocking the door. Sam the wealthy king is surprised, and tells them that he has given the keys for the door and it is their fault the keys are not working. Then imagine that 2000 years later there were still people claiming to have that key, with the door still remaining forever locked. That’s exactly the scenario we are left with. What’s the use of giving them secret knowledge that’s supposed to explain what he’s been saying all along, when the knowledge is still hidden from them? You might be saying to yourself, this doesn’t sound right, there must be an explanation. Well, no less than 2 chapters later in Matthew 15:15-16 we read: “Peter said to Him, “Explain the parable to us.” Jesus said, “Are you still lacking in understanding also?” In this case, Jesus of all people seems to be surprised that the secret knowledge he gave them (cf. Matthew 13:10-11, Luke 8:9-10), which he then hid from them (Luke 18:34), leaves them still unable to understand what he’s saying. In other words, Jesus is surprised they still don’t understand him, even though he is the one that hid its meaning from them. and God knows best. http://callingchristians.com/2015/06/11/new-testament-inconsistency-the-secrets-of-the-kingdom-of-heaven/
  21. 436 Masjids Destroyed In Central African Republic: US Ambassador To UN DTT: Christian terrorists continue to cause havoc in Central Africa Republic, ignored by the mainstream media. Innocent Muslims have been butchered to death, yet the media have ignored it completely. Almost all of the 436 Masjids in the Central African Republic (CAR) have been reduced to rubble, said Samantha Power, the US ambassador to the United Nations. She called the destruction “kind of crazy, chilling,” after a Security Council visit last week to the country. Samantha expressed concern about possible security vacuum in the near future as French forces and European Union (EU) pull out and a UN peacekeeping force is still not at full strength. As a minimum, 5000 people have been killed since CAR exploded into unprecedented sectarian violence in December 2013. Approximately 1 million of the Texas-sized country’s 4.5 million residents have been changed place. Several of those who have fled are Muslim. Samantha said 417 of the country’s Masjids have been smashed. When she pays a visit to one of the remaining Muslim neighborhood in the capital, Bangui, she described the residents as “a terrified population.” She added that some Muslim women even scared of leaving the community while wearing their veils and is choosing to give birth in their homes instead of hospital. Read the rest here…
  22. salam alaikum I may share here some german words/phrases for beginners In Shaa' Allah predigen Verb predigen : to preach Worüber wird der Pfarrer heute predigen? What will the pastor preach about today? http://www.germaneveryday.com/predigen/
  23. Learn New German Words !

    füttern to feed Ich füttere meine Fische einmal am Tag. I feed my fish once a day. https://www.jabbalab.com/word-of-the-day/german/25-01-2015/futtern
  24. The term al-wasatiyyah is derived from an Arabic word "wasat" which means middle, fair, just, moderate, milieu and setting. The word in its different forms is used in several contexts in the Qur'an, all the word forms revolving around similar linguistic meanings. Allah says: "Thus, have We made of you an Ummah (Community) justly balanced (wasatan), that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves..." (al-Baqarah 2:143). Also: "The best of them (awsatuhum) said: Did I not say to you, Why do you not glorify (Allah)?" (al-Qalam 68:28) "Be guardians of your prayers, and of the midmost (wusta) prayer, and stand up with devotion to Allah." (al-Baqarah 2:238) "And penetrate forthwith into the midst (wasatna) (of the foe) en masse." (al-'Adiyat 100:5) And: "...So its expiation is the feeding of ten poor men out of the middling (awsat) (food) you feed your families with..." (al-Ma'idah 5:89) However, the first verse and its messages signify a perspective which is principally used for advancing the nucleus of the al-wasatiyyah (moderation) paradigm. Accordingly, when Allah describes Muslims as "ummatan wasatan" (justly balanced ummah), the impression thus conveyed is that Islam is a religion of peace, moderation and impartiality, not of extremism, prejudice and intolerance. An ummah and its cultures and civilization, which have been established and molded by the vitality of Islam, are to be adorned with the same attributes and traits. Moreover, Islam is a religion of amity, justice, harmony and moderation with the Creator, self, people and at once built and natural environments. These ideals of total balance and equilibrium are to be promulgated and practiced at each and every tier of Muslim existence -- including built environment -- without compromising on honesty, integrity and truth. Indeed, this dimension of Islam is critical because so long as there is no peace, harmony or justice with God, there could be no peace, harmony or justice with self either. And surely, so long as there is no peace, justice or harmony with God and self, there could be no amity, harmony or fairness with people either, and with the rest of the constituents in the intricate web of creation. Al-wasatiyyah, it goes without saying, is multidimensional. It is corporeal, psychological, intellectual and spiritual. It is at once a philosophy and a way of life. It is comprehensive, in that it integrates and balances the requisites and delights of this world and the Hereafter, as well as of the physical and spiritual domains of existence. And it is universal, in that it affects the total wellbeing firstly of Muslims and then of all people and indeed of all animate and inanimate beings. Al-wasatiyyah, thus, is a Muslim identity. So important is al-wasatiyyah in Islam that it is almost synonymous with everything that carries the adjective "Islamic". It is because of this that for Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi the first principle of moderate and justly balanced thought is "a complete and comprehensive understanding of Islam, which is characterized as being a creed and a way, knowledge and action, worship and interaction, culture and character, truth and strength, an invitation and political engagement, religion and reality, civilization and a nation." In the same vein, according to Mohd Kamal Hassan, another implications of the notion of al-wasatiyyah for contemporary Muslim society include balancing between the permanent principles of Islamic law and the changing conditions of the time; the coupling of religious duty with the social reality; engaging in dialogue and coexistence with other people, and practicing tolerance with those who differ; as well as presenting Islam as a balanced, integrated civilizational mission for the revival, liberation and unification of the ummah. In agreement with a divine decree, the Muslim ummah charged with the morals and quintessence of al-wasatiyyah is destined to serve as a role model to other nations and communities, confidently leading and guiding them through life's challenges, trials and mysteries. This is so on account of an established historical truth that all man-generated life systems, ideologies and "solutions" in the absence of legitimate revealed truth and direction gradually fade away as soon as they come to civilization's fore, except the revelation inspired and guided life system, ideology and "solution" of Islam. The justly balanced Muslim ummah, characterized as truthful, altruistic, cultured and sophisticated, is thus to serve as a witness over others, to selflessly intervene in the cause of peace and justice and to function as mankind's ultimate source of optimism, luminosity and hope. Hence, following the pronouncement in the first of the five above-quoted Qur'anic verses that Muslims are "ummatan wasatan" (justly balanced ummah), Allah proclaims next that such is the case so "that ye might be witnesses over the nations". Furthermore, the subsequent Allah's words in the same verse: "and the Messenger a witness over yourselves", emphatically implies that to Muslims in their whole al-wasatiyyah enterprise, Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and the revealed Word constitute the supreme point of reference as well as the infinite sources of inspiration, zeal and legitimacy. Were it not for the Prophet (pbuh) and the revealed guidance, Muslims and their civilizational representation would have been stripped of their intrinsic perpetual potency, light, honor and purity. Theirs and their civilization's fate would eventually have become similar to the fates of the rest of mankind's ephemeral civilizational endeavors and experiments. It follows that what Muslims are expected to be to others in the physical world, that is what the Prophet (pbuh) is to them in both the physical and metaphysical worlds. ***** Dr. Spahic Omer, a Bosnian currently residing in Malaysia, is an Associate Professor at the Kulliyyah of Architecture and Environmental Design, International Islamic University Malaysia. - http://www.islamicity.com/articles/Articles.asp?ref=IC1409-5949#sthash.mwkCxCg7.dpuf
  25. Assalam alaikum French director Isabelle Matic has announced her decision to revert to Islam on her FaceBook account, making the unexpected announcement only a few days after Charlie Hebdo Paris attacks. “Today, I passed through the first pillar of Islam. There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is His Prophet,” Matic said in a message posted on her Facebook page on January 11. She followed her announcement with a series of posts in which she thanked Moroccan actor Hicham Bahloul for announcing her decision on Moroccan papers. In another message, she described how she took the decision and its effect on her beliefs in freedom of expression. “Between the massacre at the premises of Charlie Hebdo and other event that have followed: I became a Muslim,” Matic wrote. “Am I still for freedom of expression for all and Charlie Hebdo in particular?! Yes,” Matic wrote yesterday. “With regard to my position towards the caricatures of the Prophet, I will write you the text of the SMS that I received this morning from a Masjid which agreed quite well with my thoughts since the beginning of the cartoons, well before I became a Muslim,” she added “They are making fun of Muhammad and do not harm Muhammad. They are making fun of a character that they have imagined and to whom they have given a name. This man is not our Prophet,” she wrote. The new Muslim referred to the early life of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) when non-believers rejected his calls to Islam. “The Makkans laughed at Muhammad (worthy of praise) in the appellant Modamam (worthy of name calling). The prophet peace be upon him was smiling. Yes, he was smiling! And he said: They are making fun of Modamam and not me,” Matic wrote. “The wisdom is the answer to provocations. And this is what our beloved Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be with him) has taught us. “So when Charlie Hebdo will be published insha ' Allah (God willing), do not pay attention. Do not respond to the provocation. And do not give them of importance,” she added. In its Wednesday’s edition, Charlie Hebdo magazine features a cartoon of a man they claim to be the prophet of Islam on the cover. The cover depicts Prophet Mohammed (pbuh) with a tear falling from his cheek, holding a sign that says, "Je suis Charlie” under the headline "All Is Forgiven." The edition is the first after two gunmen attacked the magazine’s headquarters in Paris, killing 10 journalists and two policemen. Two of the dead were Muslims, an editor and a police cop. It culminates the magazine’s long history of offending millions of Muslims worldwide. http://onislam.net/english/news/europe/481949-french-director-finds-Islam-after-charlie-attacks.html?utm_source=OnIslam+Mailing+Newsletter&utm_campaign=df8d6c1145-Jan_19_20151_19_2015&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_391b1fb3dd-df8d6c1145-74795253
×