Jump to content
Islamic Forum
Yasnov

My Holocaust Problems - A Primer For Beginners

Recommended Posts

You are certainly going out of your way to not have allies, aren't you makko. Wasn't I complimenting you and agreeing with you? Frankly I just don't have the same patience you do, so I don't waste my time pouring my heart out on this subject. I usually hope that they will realize it when their arguments are destroyed by a steady application of logic; maybe that's too much to hope for.

 

I am definitely not sitting on the fence; if you actually think that, you are either delusional or haven't bothered to read any of my posts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PropellerAds
Show me the survey.

With my pleasure ...

 

AP dispatch from Moscow, Toronto Star, Sept. 26, 1991, p. A2.; Similarly, a 1992 survey found that one-fourth of people in the republics of Belarus (White Russia) and Uzbekistan favored deporting all Jews to a special Jewish region in Russian Siberia. "Survey Finds Anti-Semitism on Rise in Ex-Soviet Lands," Los Angeles Times, June 12, 1992, p. A4.

 

Yet you continue to fail to back up your assertions with any kind of evidence. Unless of course, you are simply going along with what you were taught in school.

I wonder what specific evidence do you still need?

 

I references Moses and Abraham stories how God can preserve who he wants from any harm

It Doesn't matter If I believe in God or Not, becasue you do so you can't ignore the possibility.

Using Abraham stories to defend those Zionist lies and exxagerations shows that you are grasping for straw. Miracles like the ones shown to Prophet Abraham is a thing of the past. It's interesting to see a non believer like you go to this level just to find excuses to hide lies and exxagerations that some people have made.

 

I can so totally be one, don't doubt the capabilities of human beans (im hungry). Picture me wearring a Yameka planning global domination, and stabbing Muslims in the back while blaming it on Christians :sl:.

That's like what they were doing in the Bolshevik revolution. But it makes you a Zionist, not a Jew. If your mother is not a Jew, you'll never become a proper Jew by heritage. You can be a jeweler, but who cares? ; )

 

Now ur turn, imagine urself as a rationalist ... but don't get too carried away and delte ur first post...fun stuff :sl:

I have no time for this game of imagination. Sorry ....

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is all a matter of record , recorded by the Soviets , Allies , and the Germans themselves .

Show me the records then

 

This is revisionism with a purpose , for the films , documents , eye-witnesses , artifacts , and the meticulous German Records themselves attest to the Holocaust

Show me the records ...

 

The answer is not opinion , it is historical , and Gen. Eisenhower knowing full well that there would be "denyers " for whatever reasons , made sure it was duly recorded .

So, Gen. Eisenhower is your hero, eh? Do you have anything to say about his 'death camps' and his notorius statement ""God, I hate the Germans..." (Dwight David Eisenhower in a letter to his wife in September, 1944)?

 

As usual, I can count on Makko for a passionate rebuttal. :sl:

I failed to see any rebuttal is his passionate pre-recorded speech

 

It's just history man . And your butt must be getting awfull sore from sitting on the fence there , Russ ole' boy .

I wonder if it is your lack of self-esteem, insecurity or the topic that makes you this sensitive and suspicious?

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Day 14 of the “Holocaust†Trial of Attorney Sylvia Stolz

 

What kind of a justice system can you have when the lawyers for the accused are subject to prosecution merely for defending their client?

 

######you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_bp3.blogger(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/_VJXi1IJs3hg/R5jFdJ4lwrI/AAAAAAAAAGg/FLq58D0rlbU/s1600-h/sylvia_stolz_250.jpg[/img]

 

In Mannheim Kangaroo Court, 10 January 2008 / Reported by Günter

 

Deckert / Translated by J M Damon:

 

Today there is just one police car, a new Benz Vito, in front of the courthouse. There are 10 uniformed police agents on duty, including two females, one of whom is a Turk with a BRDDR passport. We are back in the large courtroom, where we have to go through X-ray in addition to the other inspections. Is this supposed to create the impression of danger of violent attack by someone?

 

In Courtroom Nr. 2, the smallest courtroom, there are two “Staschu†[secret service] agents, both familiar faces. After noon they are reinforced with a novice Staschu as well as 5 and sometimes 7 armed police agents, at least one of whom is always female. Their job is presumably to identify onlookers who laugh or clap so that they can be fittingly chastised. There are two representatives of the media, one of whom I previously thought to be a reporter for Mannheimer Morgen and replacement for Mack. His name is Ulrich Willenberg and he writes for several newspapers, including the Wormser Zeitung. It turns out that Ms Punja Schollbuch, whom I until now knew only as “the blonde from dpa†was answerable for the two most recent MM articles. Soon another reporter arrives, whom I have never seen, but the “dpa/MM blonde†seems well acquainted with him. Before today’s session begins, there is lively and relaxed chitchat between District Attorney Grossmann and the “poodle media.â€

 

There are at least 60 visitors today, including Horst Mahler and the faithful Berliner member of the Zündel Brigade. The elder lady member of the Jewish Community is also here again. We get into a conversation and she tells me she is a member of SPD and attended my second Mannheim trial (the “Scandal Trialâ€) in the court that consisted of Dr. Müller (SPD), Dr. Orlet (former CDU) and Frau Folkerts in 1993!

 

{NOTE: This was the second verdict of Mannheim District Court in conjunction /with the Weinheim lecture given by the American researcher Fred Leuchter in November 1991. My “crime†was serving as interpreter for Fred, and this was NOT an NPD event. I was again sentenced to one year probation and 10,000 DM fine. In addition, the original volume was supposed to be burned, but it was never found. Thanks to the judge’s good opinion of me, there was a world-wide reaction, which however led to BRDDR’s toughening of Section 130 of Penal Code and increasing the maximum penalty to 5 years.}

 

Scheduled for 9:00, today’s session finally gets underway at 9:22, with no explanation for the delay. Then comes the “Grand March of the Gladiators†of the 6. Großen Strafkammer (6th Superior Criminal Court,), which really should be accompanied by music from Aida. The Court is present in its usual composition: Presiding Judge Glenz, District Attorney Grossmann (without his bodyguard today) and Sylvia Stolz with her two attorneys.

 

After the Court’s entrance, Sylvia and Attorney Bock announce that they wish to submit three more motions ­ in other words, reopen the taking of evidence. The motions are 1) An article on Judaism); 2) Sylvia’s relationship to National Socialism; 3) An article on the Zündel trial that appeared in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung entitled “Der lange, kurze Weg…†by V. Zastrow.

 

Sylvia resumes her discussion of the District Attorney’s omissions and misrepresentations in his closing argument. For the sake of the visitors, she is trying to introduce honesty and openness into these proceedings and to describe for them the evidentiary motions that Glenz will not allow her to read into the record. This kicks off the familiar game between her and Glenz, known as “submit that in writing!†­ “give it to me!†Sylvia remains calm and does not allow herself to be distracted, even when Glenz turns off her microphone. She continues talking until Glenz again threatens to officially forbid her to speak. She suddenly hands the motion to Glenz while continuing to speak. Judge Glenz then orders that photocopies be made and distributed to the Court.

 

At 9:30 Attorney Bock begins his closing statement. He begins by recalling the Andersen fairy tale about the Emperor’s New Clothes and explains that this is a story that in former times, when German families were still intact, parents used to read to their children… Bock says this Court is playing the role of the Emperor while those who profess to believe in the “Holocaust†are playing the role of the imperial retinue, conducting themselves in a “politically correct†manner. Sylvia is of course the child who calls out loud and clear:

 

“The Emperor has no clothes!â€

 

Bock points out that according to Grossmann, Sylvia in guilty on all counts.

 

Source: (you are not allowed to post links yet)"you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_curtmaynardsblog.blogspot(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/2008/01/day-14-of-holocaust-trial-of-attorney.html"]you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_curtmaynardsblog.blogspot(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/2008/...f-attorney.html[/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

PM from Apprentice:

 

Yasnov , just admit it , you're a jew hating bigot , you know the holocaust happened , just the way history has recorded it . Now you attack Eisenhower with your phony accusations , and why ?

It becomes funny when people keep saying things like "history has recorded it" without any attempts to show the records.

 

Apprentice, your hero, Eisenhower, with his DEF policy and his hatred of German people as a race, is suspected to have killed around 1.7 million German people.

 

This should be called holocaust in its own right.

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Apprentice, your hero, Eisenhower, with his DEF policy and his hatred of German people as a race, is suspected to have killed around 1.7 million German people.

 

Eisenhower didn't hate the germans. How could he when he was of German ancestry himself? His last name was originally "Eisenhauer". That one quote is a fairly feeble basis for the assertion that Eisenhower hated Germans. It was a private letter he sent to his wife, and it is fairly obvious to me that the quote was motivated by exasperated sarcasm, not hatred.

 

The claim of these Eisenhower Death camps is the work of really a single Canadian historian, and the fact that I haven't found much support for his case outside anti-semitic and Neo-Nazi websites doesn't help his case. Here is what historian Stephen Ambrose had to say about his claims:

 

"Bacque is wrong on every major charge and nearly all his minor ones. Eisenhower was not a Hitler, he did not run death camps, German prisoners did not die by the hundreds of thousands, there was a severe food shortage in 1945, there was nothing sinister or secret about the "disarmed enemy forces" designation or about the column "other losses." Mr. Bacque's "missing million" were old men and young boys in the Volkssturm (People's Militia) released without formal discharge and transfers of POWs to other allies control areas. Maj. Ruediger Overmans of the German Office of Military History in Freiburg who wrote the final volume of the official German history of the war estimated that the total death by all causes of German prisoners in American hands could not have been greater than 56,000 approximately 1% of the over 5,000,000 German POWs in Allied hands exclusive of the Soviets. Eisenhower's calculations as to how many people he would be required to feed in occupied Germany in 1945-46 were too low and he had been asking for more food shipments since February 1945. He had badly underestimated the number of German soldiers surrendering to the Western Allies; more than five million, instead of the anticipated three million as German soldiers crossed the Elbe River to escape the Russians. So too with German civilians - about 13 million altogether crossing the Elbe to escape the Russians, and the number of slave laborers and displaced persons liberated was almost 8 million instead of the 5 million expected. In short, Eisenhower faced shortages even before he learned that there were at least 17 million more people to feed in Germany than he had expected not to mention all of the other countries in war ravaged Europe, the Philippines, Okinawa and Japan. All Europe went on rations for the next three years, including Britain, until the food crisis was over."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Russ, if your great grand parents, by any chance, US WWII vets, tried to ask him about this.

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both my grandparents and great-grandparents on both sides were pastors and missionaries. I don't think they would be of much help. The only Relative involved in the war spent it hiding from the japanese in the jungles of the Visayas in the Philippines.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yasnov , you are a liar , and you slander Eisenhower . There was no death camp you are simply enhancing your argument of "no holocaust " , so you attempt to discredit everyone and everything in WW2 , that supports the historical record .

 

You are a LIAR , and that is why they made you " Islamic Guardian " .

 

The moderators of this board should be ashamed of having one such as you representing this forum , but they don't .

 

And that is because YOU uphold their agenda .

 

Apprentice has your number , you are nothing more than a jew hater , and now you attack Eisenhower , who btw was of German ancestry . So I guess he hated his parents eh ?

 

You will never realize how utterly stupid you appear to anyone with a working brain , and you are a discredit to your Indonesian fellows , for people may actually think everyone in Indonesia is as dumb and ignorant as you ....think about it .

 

You should be ashamed of your lies and slander, but you hide behind the excuse of "I found it on a website " ....and even though you know it to be a lie , you support it nonetheless .....you have no shame .

"monkey's are superior to men ,in this:

 

- a monkey looks in the mirror and sees a monkey "

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Both my grandparents and great-grandparents on both sides were pastors and missionaries. I don't think they would be of much help. The only Relative involved in the war spent it hiding from the japanese in the jungles of the Visayas in the Philippines.

Too bad. But don't worry I'll be here to accompany you explore the hidden truth

 

The claim of these Eisenhower Death camps is the work of really a single Canadian historian, and the fact that I haven't found much support for his case outside anti-semitic and Neo-Nazi websites doesn't help his case. Here is what historian Stephen Ambrose had to say about his claims:

Stephen Ambrose, is Eisenhowe's biographer. What did you expect from this man who had plagiarized at least 12 authors? It was probably the reason why Eisenhower chose him to write his biography.

 

If you need to know, Stephen Ambrose, is a laughing stock in the academic world and among historians and media critics.

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Apprentice has your number , you are nothing more than a jew hater , and now you attack Eisenhower , who btw was of German ancestry . So I guess he hated his parents eh ?

There are some Indonesians abroad who hate anything Indonesians. I also know there are some Iranians in the West who hate Iranians. Most likely they have psychological problems. Besides, being a Jewish Zionist, why should Eisenhower care about his german ancestry?

 

As Apprentice has got my number, tell him to call me anytime he likes to discuss this issue further.

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yasnov , YOU are a laughing stock , and you are cpmpletely detached from the "academic world ".

You are a shameless liar , and that's why I guess they want you on these threads , there is no other possible reason.

YOU are the one with a psychological problem , and that is - pathological liar . Thus you are typical of most holocaust deniers . For they fall in basically TWO categories , one being the skin-heads-neo-nazis and just PLAIN OLD JEW HATERS , the other categfory being muslims and arabs who've got a beef with israel , and will embrace any theory or notion they believe will stregnthen their arguments against the jews .

THAT is "your holocaust problem " . LOL....and is " a primer for morons " , and people with dysfunctional brains , incapable of any connective thought .

 

Don't attempt to prop yourself up as an intellectual or even a curious student , you are neither .

 

You are merely a brainwashed bigot , who has been trained to read and write .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stephen Ambrose, is Eisenhowe's biographer. What did you expect from this man who had plagiarized at least 12 authors? It was probably the reason why Eisenhower chose him to write his biography.

 

Bravo. You did cursory research on the man. I actually didn't expect you to bother; after all, you are the one who is fond of saying that people should be judged on the merits of there research as opposed to their reputation, so you can feel free to quote from Rense(contact admin if its a beneficial link), Neo-Nazis, etc. without fear of reprisal. Are you now admitting that the researcher's reputation is an important factor?

 

Btw, calling Eisenhower a jew, for future reference, not only reflects upon your ignorance, but a possible bigoted motivation as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is no wonder that Yasnov gravitates towards such websites , it wets his appetite ,which is that of a bigot .

 

 

LOL.....just what is it , that you are "Guardian " of here , Yasnov ?

 

Your charade here Yasnov , is only effective on imbeciles , you do see that don't you ?

 

You are what you eat Yasnov , and it's pouring out of your ears .

 

So you gleen your ...erm ..."facts " from nazi websites ...hmmm....that says alot about you Yasnov .

 

You no doubt , are shameless about that too .

 

And Russ says , " a possible bigoted motivation " ?????

 

Hahaha , that's the understatement of the year .

 

You're not a religious guy , are you Yasnov ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you now admitting that the researcher's reputation is an important factor?

Yes and no. People like Livius and you attacked David Duke not because he has inaccurate account of history, but because you think he is racist and therefore you feel justified in dismissing all of his factual statements. As for your historian, Stephen Ambrose, he is indeed criticized for his shoddy and missing reseach, inaccuracies, forgery, plagiarism.

 

Btw, calling Eisenhower a jew, for future reference, not only reflects upon your ignorance, but a possible bigoted motivation as well.

He had some Jewish ancestry. His actions at least shows exactly what race he originated from. His lack of compassion for pows, the mass starvations and the consequence of his open field policy put him on par with the murderous bolsheviks.

 

Reference: (you are not allowed to post links yet)"you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_judicial-inc.biz/Hopie_ike.htm"]you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_judicial-inc.biz/Hopie_ike.htm[/url]

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

David Duke another of your heroes yasnov ? I'll bet you cried real tears when you learned about Hitlers defeat .

Nice BIGOTED statement about Eisenhower , your bigotry runs deep don't it Yasnov .

 

 

You can't cover it over with your "student act ' , you're hardcore man , a true jew hater .

 

You avoided my question Yasnov ...do you claim to be a religious guy ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You avoided my question Yasnov ...do you claim to be a religious guy ?

Your question has no relevance to the subject being discussed. It is a distraction, in fact.

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your question has no relevance to the subject being discussed. It is a distraction, in fact.

 

Wassalam,

Y

 

 

Sure it does , for you can't claim to be a religious man , and engage in lies and slander at the same time .

 

LOL.... a distraction ? Your lies are distractions from the truth ......YOU are a distraction .

Your accusations against Eisenhower are a distraction , your bigoted aspersion of Eisenhowers alleged "jewish descendency " is a distraction , and your implication that because of that he oversaw death camps because he has alleged jewish descendency , your bigotry and propensity to lie , is more than obvious , .....distractions from your holocaust denial ....your " problem with the holocaust " ...all in fact DEFLECTIONS from the FACT that all you say is baseless , and motivated soley by your own personal bigotry .

 

It is all relevant Yasnov , relevant to what you are , relevant to the very reason you started this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sure it does , for you can't claim to be a religious man , and engage in lies and slander at the same time .

Please point it out to me the lies and slander you are referring to ...

I can't believe this, in this late January 2008 some Americans still don't know the real truth about Eisenhower ...

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yasnov, considering the fact that the academic work you're talking about came out as recently as 1991, and that it is a highly disputed theory, not a fact, it is a bit rich to whine about people not knowing "the truth".

 

Ironically, if you're hatred of imperialism were really stronger than your apparent sympathy for nazis, than you would probably like a lot of what Eisenhower had to say...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yasnov, considering the fact that the academic work you're talking about came out as recently as 1991, and that it is a highly disputed theory, not a fact, it is a bit rich to whine about people not knowing "the truth".

What you don't know about him after all these years:

- Eisenhower has some Jewish ancestry

- He hated Germans as a race

- Changing the term "prisoners of war" to "disarmed enemy forces," so that they would not be subject to the Geneva Convention.

- Thousands of Germans were kept in barbed wire enclosures in meadows with no shelter and almost no food. They were eating grass to stay alive. Even your historian, Stephen E. Ambrose, at some point, (you are not allowed to post links yet)"you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_serendipity.li/hr/bacque_on_wikipedia.htm"]confirmed this[/url].

- They killed lots and lots of Germans after the war ended

- Etc ...

 

Ironically, if you're hatred of imperialism were really stronger than your apparent sympathy for nazis, than you would probably like a lot of what Eisenhower had to say...

Only racist murderers likes what he said. His actions speak louder than his words.

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yasnov , your bigoted attitude towards jews leads you down many roads . No Eisenhower did not "love " the Germans , in fact he resented them for the enslavement of Europe , and their attempted extermination of jews . His resentment was heightened by the fact that the German citizenry falsely claimed they were not aware of the death camps in their midst , not aware of the inhumane treatment of their own fellow citizens whom they had turned against, as the odor of their burning flesh was still fresh in thei nostrils .

 

As for any prisoners taken ? The Germans surrendered in massive numbers while the war was still going on , and no accomodations were available for 2,3 , 4 hundred thousand prisoners to be fed .

Your argument here is based in ignorance of conditions present in WW2.

The Soviets on the other hand systematically starved and marched 4-5 hundred thousand German POW's to their death .

 

All you are doing here Yasnov , is attempting to rationalize your denial of history regarding the holocaust . Better go check the credentials and motives of your "redacting author " , regarding Eisenhower .If anything , the Germans themselves would be decrying such brutal treatment that you allege ...and they have not . But YOU have found an author to assist in your revisionism . And that is becausethat is what you are looking for , and unfortunately , on the internet , you may choose the LIAR of your choice . You embrace them because they assist in your bigoted motives .

 

You are no better than the skin heads and neo-nazis that iinhabit the dreggs of the internet , as they are there for you .

The other posters have you pinned precisely , you are a bigot ,a jew hater and a liar . Unfortuantely most of your lot feels the same way for the same reason , an unmitigated hatred towards israel and jews .

It is quite apparent in all of your arguments Yasnov , you cannot hide it in a smoke-screen of " phony intellectual pursuit ".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No Eisenhower did not "love " the Germans , in fact he resented them for the enslavement of Europe , and their attempted extermination of jews .

That's right. After dancing around my questions, now you come clean and admit that he hated Germans. Let's see what his then Deputy, General Lucius Clay, said regarding the Germans:

 

“I feel that the Germans should suffer from hunger and from cold as I believe such suffering is necessary to make them realize the consequences of a war which they caused"

 

And do you know why Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower frequently clashed with Gen. George S. Patton?

 

His resentment was heightened by the fact that the German citizenry falsely claimed they were not aware of the death camps in their midst , not aware of the inhumane treatment of their own fellow citizens whom they had turned against, as the odor of their burning flesh was still fresh in thei nostrils .

That's why I said he is no better than Bolshevik, or Hitler.

 

As for any prisoners taken ? The Germans surrendered in massive numbers while the war was still going on , and no accomodations were available for 2,3 , 4 hundred thousand prisoners to be fed .

Trying to distort history now? The fact is that the Red Cross inspectors were banned, Red Cross food aid was returned, building of shelters was forbidden and soldiers were kept on short rations. And it's all happened after the war has ended. Please find out yourself what senator Homer E. Capehart had to say about this. You can see Eisenhower's hatred from his non-fraternization's policies about the prohibition to speak with German children and adults, as well as the prohibition on marriage between Americans and German or Austrian civilians. Even the U.S. soldiers were not allowed to pay anything for a child they admitted being the father of, since that was considered as "aiding the enemy". They felt the girls were the enemy, but used them for sex nevertheless.

 

The Soviets on the other hand systematically starved and marched 4-5 hundred thousand German POW's to their death
.

Please stop pointing finger at others in order to hide your crimes.

 

All you are doing here Yasnov , is attempting to rationalize your denial of history regarding the holocaust . Better go check the credentials and motives of your "redacting author " , regarding Eisenhower.

You better advise Russ about this. He is using a historian who is also a biographer of Eisenhower. And so far, Stephen Ambrose is the only one who has come to the defense of Eisenhower, plus bunchs of ignorant Americans who are never bothered to find the real story.

 

It is quite apparent in all of your arguments Yasnov , you cannot hide it in a smoke-screen of " phony intellectual pursuit ".

I am not trying to look like an intellectual. It's all simple fact and history. Something that you have been denied for such a long time.

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stargazer is justifying US crimes against Germans the same way Hitler justified his crimes against Jews for treason/betrayal. For further reference, you can read Eoin's thread about Jew's betrayal and treason in Germany.

 

Wassalam,

Y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea Yasnov , I'm sure everyone should just apologize , for how badly the Germans were treated , you know after they raped Europe , and caused roughly 55 million deaths , yea poor Germans , and to think Eisenhower sought to make them feel exactly that which they forced on millions .

 

Such crocodile tears eh Yasnov , you sure have regrets about Hitlers defeat dont you .

 

Your bigotry clouds your thought processes Yasnov , but this whole "circus -side-show " of yours , is meant by you , to serve only one purpose ...justanother vehich;le for you to rationalize and justify your denial of the holocaust .

In reality you are no better than those in whom you find fellowship with....the skinheads , neo-nazis , and various virulent strains of jew-haters .

 

Do you really think you are successfully disguising your motives ?

 

You make such rhetoric and childish statements as "Eisenhower "hated the Germans " ...of course he did , there was a war going on ...lol...one in which your people sided with the Japanese who were allied with Hitler , so its no surprise to be hearing sour grapes from you , not to mention , you are an obvious jew hater .

I guess you're kinda upset about the outcome of WW2 , you'd rather the japanese who slaughtered 10 million , and the germans who attempted to exterminate your " acursed jews ", would have won the war .

 

Sorry it did not "workout to your liking " Yasnov .

 

I guess someone like you , has nothing left , but to vent your hatefull venom , and use any means necessarry , in the process .

-too bad you have chosen to embrace the phony lies and slander of your " uh ...credible internet sources " .

 

But hey ....they'll suffice for you .

 

As far as your phiny allegations and cookede statistics , best thing for youto do , is ask the Germans themselves , for if all you claim had been done to them , there would surely be millions of Germans and their children telling the same stories .

 

But that isn't the case is it Yasnov ?

 

No it is simply your agenda which causes your deluded exercises with your fellow jew-haters .But then again bigots are liars as well , it's part of their mentality .

 

You can attempt tp pervert the historical record all you want Yasnov , it is only digested by like-minded individuals such as yourself , everyone else spits it out in your face , and they identify you for what you truly are ...a hatefilled bigot , willing to lie , to prop-up revisionist history .

 

- have a ball Yasnov , they may even make you "Moderator " next , .....you certainly fit the bill .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×