Jump to content
Islamic Forum
Sign in to follow this  
yusufar

More Evidence Nuking Iran Is On Schedule By Kurt Nimmo

Recommended Posts

(www.)"http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060213&articleId=1965"]Globalresearch.ca[/url]

 

More Evidence Nuking Iran is on Schedule

Sunday February 12th 2006, 3:38 am

 

In a story appearing in the Sunday Telegraph, the newspaper once owned by the Canadian criminal finagler and neocon “Lord” Conrad Black, amoral strategists “at the Pentagon are drawing up plans for devastating bombing raids backed by submarine-launched ballistic missile attacks against Iran’s nuclear sites as a ‘last resort’ to block Teheran’s efforts to develop an atomic bomb.” If not so deadly serious, the idea that the Straussian neocons will shock and awe Iran only as a “last resort” would be comical.

In fact, they have long planned to bomb Iran—imaginary nukes or not—and kill as many Iranians as possible and decimate the civilian infrastructure, as they have done in Iraq (some estimates put the death toll thus far above 130,000). “Central Command and Strategic Command planners are identifying targets, assessing weapon-loads and working on logistics for an operation, the Sunday Telegraph has learnt.”

 

In fact, the Pentagon has long mapped out its targets, including “secondary targets,” usually civilian airports, radio and TV installations, telecommunications centers, government buildings, conventional power plants, water and waste treatment plants, highways and bridges, and rail lines. In Iraq (twice) this sort of “targeting” resulted in massive suffering and death (coupled with sanctions after the first Bush Iraq Invasion, more than a million Iraqis died of starvation and disease, a stunning crime against humanity).

 

These criminal strategists, basically no different than the German Wehrmacht strategists who planned Operation Barbarossa, “are reporting to the office of Donald Rumsfeld, the defense secretary, as America updates plans for action if the diplomatic offensive fails to thwart the Islamic republic’s nuclear bomb ambitions.” Of course, this “diplomatic offensive” is designed to fail, as the “diplomatic offensive” prior to the Iraqi invasion failed (and the “diplomatic offensive” in Afghanistan failed, even though the Taliban were ready to turn over Osama bin Laden, if only the Americans were able to provide evidence of his complicity in nine eleven, something the Americans were unable and unwilling to do because they did not have compelling evidence and, besides, they had planned to invade Afghanistan well before nine eleven, as plenty of evidence attests).

 

“This is more than just the standard military contingency assessment,” a senior Pentagon adviser told the Telegraph. “This has taken on much greater urgency in recent months.”

 

Indeed, the shock and awe dismemberment of Iranian society is considered more “than just the standard military contingency assessment,” as the PNAC Straussian neocons have long told us. It has “taken on much greater urgency in recent months” because the Bush administration, a front for the Straussian neocon nihilists, is winding down and it will take months to obliterate Iranian culture and civil society. Moreover, the neocons need to fit in Syria, at minimum—they would prefer to do Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, but this is obviously too ambitious, that is unless they can figure out a way to keep Bush in office.

 

“The prospect of military action could put Washington at odds with Britain which fears that an attack would spark violence across the Middle East, reprisals in the West and may not cripple Teheran’s nuclear program. But the steady flow of disclosures about Iran’s secret nuclear operations and the virulent anti-israeli threats of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has prompted the fresh assessment of military options by Washington. The most likely strategy would involve aerial bombardment by long-distance B2 bombers, each armed with up to 40,000lb of precision weapons, including the latest bunker-busting devices. They would fly from bases in Missouri with mid-air refuelling.”

 

Nonsense, Tony Blair is fully onboard with the plan to reduce the Middle East to a simmering cauldron of violence and dead, mutilated bodies. Bush, Rumsfeld, Rice, et al, are ecstatic over Ahmadinejad’s highly suspect anti-Semitic (or rather, anti-Ashkenazi, since the majority of Jews in israel are white Europeans and not Semites) declarations, leading more than a few people to believe he is a Mossad agent or has an as of yet unknown reason for egging on the israelis and Americans. Either way, Ahmadinejad is courting disaster.

 

As former CIA intelligence analyst Philip Giraldi told the American Conservative last July, the United States plans to nuke the be-jesus out of Iran. “The Pentagon, acting under instructions from Vice President Cheney’s office, has tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan includes a large-scale air assault on Iran employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons.” All of this despite the fact Iran is a non-nuclear country, a signatory to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, and working with the IAEA, although the latter reported Iran to the UN Security Council last week. So itchy is the Pentagon to use nukes against non-nuke countries, they wrote the “policy” in their “Doctrine for Joint Nuclear Operations” (pdf doc).

 

“Senator Joe Lieberman, a Democrat, [said] Mr. Bush is expected to be faced by the decision [to criminally bomb Iran] within two years.” More balderdash—the United States plans to bomb Iran next month, or soon thereafter. It wants Iran wasted sooner before later. Last week Vladimir Zhirinovsky, leader of the Liberal Democrats in Russia, told the Ekho Moskvy radio station “that the Muslim [cartoon] riots were orchestrated by the US to garner European backing for the military strike” and the “war is inevitable because the Americans want this war. Any country claiming a leading position in the world will need to wage wars. Otherwise it will simply not be able to retain its leading position,” as well spelled out by the PNAC maniacs who have captured the flag in Washington.

 

Kurt Nimmo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PropellerAds

I see nothing in here that is "more evidence nuking Iran is on schedule".

 

This is an interesting source you have here. I see you have made two posts today based on it. I checked out the site and the first thing I noticed was a retraction from an earlier article that he wrote based on information he found out to be a hoax. Quite an expert you are citing.

 

Your information source works at a Wal-Mart in New Mexico developing pictures. He reads articles on the internet (of obviously dubious origin) and then writes in his blog about them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings Livius

 

I see nothing in here that is "more evidence nuking Iran is on schedule".

 

This is an interesting source you have here. I see you have made two posts today based on it. I checked out the site and the first thing I noticed was a retraction from an earlier article that he wrote based on information he found out to be a hoax. Quite an expert you are citing.

 

Your information source works at a Wal-Mart in New Mexico developing pictures. He reads articles on the internet (of obviously dubious origin) and then writes in his blog about them.

 

"Kurt Nimmo

Born 1952, Detroit, MI

 

Recent Teaching

As a multimedia developer, photographer, and educator for New Mexico State University at Las Cruces, I am involved in teaching other educators graphic and photographic techniques with Adobe Photoshop.

 

Selected Recent Exhibitions

2002 Fifteen Photographs, The Bean Gallery, Mesilla, New Mexico

2001 Subversion of Order: Selected Photographs by Kurt Nimmo, Impecunious Art Gallery, Kent, Ohio

 

Awards

First Place, Foto Dimension Magazine

Honorable Mention, Apogee Photo Magazine

 

Feature Articles

Kurt Nimmo's Southwest, Digital Camera Magazine, September, 2001

The Poetry of Incongruity - The Photographs of Kurt Nimmo, The Ink, January, 2002

 

Print Publication

Long Shot, Volume 24, 2001

 

Online Exhibitions

Yourwall

(www.)"http://yourwall/portfolio.asp?ArtistID=255"]yourwall/portfolio.asp?ArtistID=255[/url]

 

PhotoArts

(www.)"http://photoarts/journal/nimmo/nowhere/"]photoarts/journal/nimmo/nowhere/[/url]

 

ZoneZero

(www.)"http://zonezero/comunity/portfolios/paisaje/nimmo/1en.html"]zonezero/comunity/portfolios/pa.../nimmo/1en.html[/url]

 

Guerilla One

(www.)"http://guerillaone/photography_02_07/kurt_1.html"]guerillaone/photography_02_07/kurt_1.html[/url]

 

Artists-in-residence

(www.)"http://artists-in-residence/~nimmo/""]artists-in-residence/~nimmo/"[/url]

 

Is this the same person?

 

You forget that you are talking to a Muslim - our Prophet (pbuh) was illiterate. I don't care whether Kurt Nimmo is a janitor at the Wal-Mart in Antartica - he writes quite well and sensibly to me and, as far as I can gather, to a lot of other people as well. I don't see anywhere that he claims to be an expert and even that does not matter to me - I've seen many purported experts who were just plain wrong.

 

Are you rooting for Bush to nuke Iran?

 

Regards,

 

yusufar

islamicunityfoundation

One God One Religion One Community One Nation

Anti-Arab = Anti-Semite Anti-Muslim = Anti-Peace

Anti-Islam = Anti-Civilisation

Please Identify Yourself - Which Are You? All of the above? Shame on You!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are you rooting for Bush to nuke Iran?

 

That has to be one of the most insulting and idiotic question I have ever been asked on these forums. I want nothing more than peace and do not want to see anyone die, much less something as stupid as nuking someone.

 

Please state one thing that I have said that even remotely gives you impression I want Iran nuked.

 

Yes, he recently moved up from working at Wal-Mart to working for a university, but that doesn't change the fact that his major sources of information are websites with little validity. He claims the US is going to bomb Iran withing the next couple of months. It won't happen and you'll never see him recant it or even mention he was wrong when it doesn't happen.

 

He is an anti-American sensationalist who uses screwed up logic to rile people up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings Livius,

 

That has to be one of the most insulting and idiotic question I have ever been asked on these forums. I want nothing more than peace and do not want to see anyone die, much less something as stupid as nuking someone.

 

Please state one thing that I have said that even remotely gives you impression I want Iran nuked.

 

Yes, he recently moved up from working at Wal-Mart to working for a university, but that doesn't change the fact that his major sources of information are websites with little validity. He claims the US is going to bomb Iran withing the next couple of months. It won't happen and you'll never see him recant it or even mention he was wrong when it doesn't happen.

 

He is an anti-American sensationalist who uses screwed up logic to rile people up.

 

My apologies if you felt insulted. However I don't think it was an idiotic question at all - or perhaps I am too much of an idiot to be insulted by this counter-remark.

 

I was merely exasperated at the cynicism, scepticism and just plain negativism of your comments about Kurt Nimmo, whose views I would venture to say have a more than modest following. Who are you to decide what are websites with little or more validity any way? Your saying so doen't make them so.

 

Not all of us have access to the CIA or the NSA or the White House. In any event, with all the cover-ups and the amount of disinformation coming out of US Government sources especially after the WWII, who would trust the mainstream sources and media these days?

 

Can Kurt Nimmo - an American - be anti-American? You sound like a US Government propaganda machine. Does expressing anti-US government sentiments = anti-American? That is rather disingenous isn't it? The same goes for anti-Zionism and anti-israel government views as well - these do not and cannot amount to being anti-Jewish.

 

It's Bush and his whole administration and all those in the West that support him who are using worse than screwed up logic to rile the whole world up against Islam, Muslim countries and Muslims everywhere.

 

Regards nonetheless,

 

yusufar

islamicunityfoundation

One God One Religion One Community One Nation

Anti-Arab = Anti-Semite

Anti-Muslim = Anti-Peace

Anti-Islam = Anti-Civilisation

Are You Any Of The Above?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Can Kurt Nimmo - an American - be anti-American?

 

Yes. It is quite common actually. It comes with having true freedom of speech. There are large portions of the population that make anyone they see as defying authority a hero, regardless of exactly how they defy it.

 

The same goes for anti-Zionism and anti-israel government views as well - these do not and cannot amount to being anti-Jewish.

 

No, being anti-Zionist does not mean that one is anti-Jewish. The problem, though, is that there are many who are anti-Jewish, including members of this forum, that hide behind the word "Zionist" when it is obvious they mean "Jew". Using the same logic, just because someone is anti-Zionist does not mean that they are not anti-Jewish also. It is all too common actually.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

×