Jump to content
Islamic Forum
Zeinab

Origins Of A Global Bully

Recommended Posts

Origins of a Global Bully: The Myths of Independence Day [using large font size is not allowed]

 

July 8, 2008

 

By JOHN CHUCKMAN

 

If you relish myths and enjoy superstition, then the flatulent speeches of America’s Independence Day, July 4, were just the thing for you. No religion on earth has more to offer along these lines than America celebrating itself.

 

Some, believing the speeches but curious, ask how did a nation founded on supposedly the highest principles by high-minded men manage to become an ugly imperial power pushing aside international law and the interests of others? The answer is simple: the principles and high-mindedness are the same stuff as the loaves and the fishes.

 

The incomparable Doctor Johnson had it right when he called patriotism the last refuge of scoundrels and scoffed at what he called the "drivers of negroes" yelping about liberty.

 

Few Americans even understand that Johnson's first reference was to their sacred Founding Fathers (aka Patriots). I have seen a well known American columnist who attributed the pronouncement to Ben Franklin, a man who was otherwise admirable but nevertheless dabbled a few times in slave trading himself.

 

Johnson especially had in mind history’s supreme hypocrite, Jefferson, with his second reference. Again, few Americans know that Jefferson kept his better than two hundred slaves to his dying day. I know a well educated American who sincerely believed Jefferson had freed his slaves. Such is the power of the myths of the American Civic Religion.

 

Jefferson was incapable of supporting himself, living the life of a prince and being a ridiculous spendthrift who died bankrupt and still owing money to others, the man of honor being a trifle less than honorable in paying back the money he often borrowed. When a new silk frock or set of shoes with silver buckles was to be had, Jefferson never hesitated to buy them rather than pay his debts.

 

The date we now celebrate, July 4, is based on the Continental Congress's approval of the Declaration of Independence, but in fact the date is incorrect, the document was approved on July 2.

 

Jefferson wrote the first draft of the declaration, but it was edited by the redoubtable Benjamin Franklin, and later was heavily amended by the Continental Congress. Jefferson suffered great humiliation of his pride and anger at the editing and changes.

 

Despite the document's stirring opening words, if you actually read the whole thing, you will be highly disappointed.

 

The bulk of it has a whining tone in piling on complaint after complaint against the Crown. Some would say the whining set a standard for the next quarter millennium of American society.

 

In Jefferson’s draft it went on and on about Britain's slave trade. The 'slave trade' business was particularly hypocritical, trying to sound elevated while in fact reflecting something else altogether. At the time there was a surplus of human flesh in Virginia, and prices were soft.

 

The cause of the Revolution is also interesting and never emphasized in American texts. Britain's imposition of the Quebec Act created a firestorm of anti-Catholicism in the colonies. They were afraid of being ruled from a Catholic colony.

 

The speech and writing of American colonists of the time was filled with exactly the kind of ugly language one associates with extremist Ulstermen in recent years.

 

This combined with the sense of safety engendered from Britain's victory in the French and Indian War (the Seven Years War)and the unwillingness to pay taxes to help pay for that victory caused the colonial revolt.

 

Few Americans know it, but it was the practice for many, many decades to burn the Pope in effigy on Guy Fawkes Day along the Eastern Seaboard. Anti-Catholicism was quite virulent for a very long time.

 

The first phase of the revolt in and around Boston was actually something of a popular revolution, responding to Britain's blockading the harbor and quartering troops in Boston.

 

The colonial aristocrats were having none of that, and they appointed Washington commander over the heads of the Boston Militias who volunteered and actually elected their officers.

 

Washington, who had always wanted to be a British regular commander but never received the commission, imposed his will ferociously. He started flogging and hanging.

In his letters home, the men who actually started the revolution are described as filth and scum. He was a very arrogant aristocrat.

 

The American Revolution has been described by a European as home-grown aristocrats replacing foreign-born ones. It is an apt description.

 

Washington, Hamilton, Adams, and many other of the Fathers had no faith in democracy. About one percent of early Virginia could vote. The president was not elected by people but by elites in the Electoral College. The Senate, which even today is the power in the legislature, was appointed well into the 20th century.

 

The Supreme Court originally never dared interpret the Bill of Rights as determining what states should do. It sat on paper like an advertising brochure with no force. At one time, Jefferson seriously raised the specter of secession, half a century before the Civil War, over even the possibility of the Bill of Rights being interpreted by a national court and enforced.

 

The Founding Fathers saw popular voting as endangering property ownership. Democracy was viewed by most the same way Washington viewed the “scum” who started the Revolution around Boston. It took about two hundred years of gradual changes for America to become anything that seriously could be called democratic. Even now, what sensible person would call it anything but a rough work still in progress.

 

It is interesting to reflect on the fact that early America was ruled by a portion of the population no larger than what is represented today by the Chinese Communist Party as a portion of that country’s population.

 

Yet today we see little sign of patience or understanding in American arrogance about how quickly other states should become democratic. And we see in Abu Ghraib, in Guantanamo, and in the CIA’s International Torture Gulag that the principles and attitudes of the Bill of Rights still haven’t completely been embraced by America.

 

Contrary to all the posturing amongst the Patriots – who few were a minority at the time - about tyranny, the historical facts indicate that Britain on the whole actually had offered good government to its North American Colonies.

 

Everyone who visited the Colonies from Europe noted the exceptional health of residents.

 

They also noticed what seemed an extraordinary degree of freedom enjoyed by colonists. It was said to be amongst the freest place in the known world, likely owing in good part to its distance from the Mother Country. A favorite way to wealth was smuggling, especially with the Caribbean. John Han#### made his fortune that way.

 

Ben Franklin once wrote a little memo, having noted the health of Americans and their birth rates, predicting the future overtaking of Britain by America, an idea not at all common at the time.

 

Indeed, it was only the relative health and freedom which made the idea of separation at all realistic. Britain was, of course, at the time viewed much the way, with the same awe of power, people view America today. These well-known facts of essentially good government in the Colonies made the Declaration of Independence list of grievances sound exaggerated and melodramatic to outsiders even at the time.

 

The combination of the Quebec Act, anti-Catholicism, dislike of taxes, plus the desire to move West and plunder more Indian lands were the absolute causes of the Revolution.

 

Britain tried to recognize the rights of the aboriginals and had forbidden any movement west by the Colonies.

 

But people in the colonies were land-mad, all hoping to make a fortune staking out claims they would sell to later settlers. The map of Massachusetts, for example, showed the colony stretching like a band across the continent to the Pacific. Britain did not agree.

 

George Washington made a lot of money doing this very thing, more than any other enterprise of his except for marrying Martha Custis, the richest widow in the colonies.

 

The tax issue is interesting.

 

The French and Indian War (the Seven Years War) heavily benefited the Colonists by removing the threat of France in the West. Once the war was over, many colonists took the attitude that Britain could not take the benefits back, and they refused to pay the taxes largely imposed to pay the war's considerable cost.

 

And Americans have hated taxes since.

 

By the way, in the end, without the huge assistance of France, the Colonies would not have won the war. France played an important role in the two decisive victories, Saratoga and Yorktown. At Saratoga they had smuggled in the weapons the Americans used. At Yorktown, the final battle, the French were completely responsible for the victory and for even committing to the battle. Washington had wanted instead to attack New York – which would have been a disaster – but the French generals then assisting recognized a unique opportunity at Yorktown.

 

After the war, the United States never paid the huge French loans back. Some gratitude. Also the United States renounced the legitimate debts many citizens owed to British factors (merchant/shippers) for no good reason at all except not wanting to pay.

 

It was all a much less glorious beginning than you would ever know from the drum-beating, baton-twirling, sequined costumes, and noise today. And if you really want to understand why America has become the very thing it claimed it was fighting in 1776, then you only need a little solid history.

 

(you are not allowed to post links yet)"you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_you are not allowed to post links yetcounterpunch(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/chuckman07082008.html"]Link[/url]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PropellerAds

What about the 10,000 christians slaughtered in your country -Lebanon , in the early 80's ?

 

Who you gonna try to blame that on ?

 

 

Yet for all your bad-mouthing of the US , Lebanese , Syrians , Egyptians , Saudis . Pakistanis , Somalis , and yes EVEN PALESTINIANS come to the US , where they live more free than any other place on Earth , ESPECIALLY more freedom than any arab or muslim nation .

 

Go ahead and rant , if you wish , lol....the sounds of children and firecrackers celebrating the 4th of July drown out your whining .

 

In the meantime .....GO CLEAN UP YOUR OWN KITCHEN .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As we all know there are always two sides to every story, but putting the blackest version besides the whitest version does not create shades of grey, if you get my meaning. A lot of good things came out of the founding of our country (which will not always be your enemy, btw; keep that in mind). Are we searching here for the true story of the US's founding, or are we trying to paint it in the darkest colors possible for propaganda purposes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pakistanis , Somalis , and yes EVEN PALESTINIANS come to the US , where they live more free than any other place on Earth , ESPECIALLY more freedom than any arab or muslim nation .

by that, it seems your ultimate goals is only for the best of your own nation at the perils of other nations, which mean you can do whatever you want with the rest of the world, bomb them, rape them, kill them all, enslave them, but ensure that the different ethnic groups of the people whose country you have exploited and manipulated, all are "free" and "equal" and "live in peace" in your own country.

 

you don't seem to think that the people beyond your own country also deserve not to be bombed, not to be cheated, and not to be manipulated your country.

 

wassalam,

y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Are we searching here for the true story of the US's founding, or are we trying to paint it in the darkest colors possible for propaganda purposes?

russ, may be the topic will serve to balance the propaganda and the whitewashing? if you get my meaning.

 

wassalam,

y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well yasnov , you ought to know by now , that what "seems to you " doesn't seem to be reality at all .

 

 

But if your asking is my country the freest in the world ? the answer is yes , so much so that most of the naysayers and whiners , would prefer to l;ive here over their own countries ......as far as your B.S. statement about "raping etc. etc . , well you do know better Yasanov , but will never admit it , and yes Russ is quitre correct in his estimation of yours and Zeinabs statements .

 

 

As far as bombing ? Well dont bomb us and we won't bomb YOU , don't attack us , and we won't attack YOU ....simple rules to follow .

 

matbe in the years preceeding the WTC attacks and the embassy bombings, and all the other bombings omn US interests , maybe your little freinds should have thought of the consequences , like you know .....retaliation . Your historyis no better than the US , nor any arab or muslim country ,. as I explained to Zeinab , which I'm sure she doesn't want to hear .....CLEAN UP YOUR OWN KITCHEN YASNOV , BEFORE YOU DEFAME AND CRITICIZE OTHERS , YOUR OWN COUNTRY IS CERTAINLY NO MODEL OF DEMOCRACY , TOLERANCE , or FREEDOM ....LOL....or anything else for that matter .

 

And you've got no one to blame for that, but yourselves . Though I'm sure you don't feel that way , for "eternal victims "...need eternal scapegoats, for the own ill-gotten circumstances .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And BTW , ZEINAB has not yet responded to my question about the slaughters in her country ....perhaps she needs more time to concoct another "bully " who committed those crimes ....I'm sure she will , and it will be someone or something outside Lebanon , and the Lerbanese people .....who are picking up again after a 30 year civil war which accomplished absolutely NOTHING .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But if your asking is my country the freest in the world ? the answer is yes , so much so that most of the naysayers and whiners , would prefer to l;ive here over their own countries ......

i think your country needs a caliphate, taj. that way you will not only think for your country, but also for the whole world.

 

wassalam,

y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But not be able to vote or go to a concert or wear shorts or visit an art gallery or talk to unrelated women or ... The other big "internationalist" organisation is Communism, and given the choice between a theocratic dictatorship (of any religion) or a Communist dictatorship, I'd choose Communism. (Both are unappealing.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i think your country needs a caliphate, taj. that way you will not only think for your country, but also for the whole world.

 

wassalam,

y

 

 

 

 

Haha......let ANYONE attempt that Yasnov.........and see what happens ....we are NOT , the Brits or the French . [ and even they will open their eyes very soon ]

 

Think for the world ??? Indeed , I see how all the OTHER PROPONENTS FOR SHARIA LAW IN THE MUSLIM WORLD ......."think for the world " .......don'tthink I need to see anymore....before I lock and load ./

 

 

LOL...........go for it .

Edited by Taj

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

......and still Zeinab remains silent regarding the 10,000 christians slaughtered in her country .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
......and still Zeinab remains silent regarding the 10,000 christians slaughtered in her country .

by whom and when?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

By whom ? muslims in Lebanon ....when 1982 .

 

Don't you think Zeinab more qualified to answer , since she "alleges " to be Lebanese ....lol...but has remained strangely silent .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

--The Lebanese Christians also became the bankers of the Arab world. Lebanese Christian-owned banks laundered huge sums of money for Arab Muslim dictators, Arab Muslim terrorists and Arab Muslim drug kingpins.

 

 

 

Shocking images from a January 1976 Muslim terrorist atrocity in Lebanon - After the Lebanese Christian town of Damour was overrun by Arab Muslim terrorists - who proceeded to butcher its inhabitants - an entire family of Arab Christians was dragged through the streets and shot dead in front of a Muslim cameraman

 

However, despite their frantic efforts to do everything possible to demonstrate their zealous loyalty to the Arab Muslim world, the Lebanese Christians were still hated as "infidels" by the Muslims.

 

By 1975, Lebanon's Christian majority had become a minority because of the huge Muslim birthrate.

 

Now a majority, Lebanon's Muslims started a civil war in 1975 with the express goal of annihilating all of the Christian "infidels."

 

The Lebanese Muslims were armed by Syria, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.

 

Furthermore, the PLO - who were invited into Lebanon by the Lebanese Christians - joined with the Muslims in the war to wipe out the Christians.

 

The savage Lebanese civil war raged on from 1975 to 1982.

 

By 1982, over 300,000 Lebanese Christian men, women and children had been murdered by the Lebanese Muslims and their PLO terrorist allies.

 

 

The Lebanese supported Arab Muslim terrorism against israel - In the photograph, a Lebanese woman waves farewell to retreating PLO Arab Muslim terrorists, one of whom is displaying a picture of the Arab Hitler Yasser Arafat

 

The Lebanese Christians were able to fight back solely because they received weaponry from israel - the same israel that they had sought to exterminate for so many years in a futile attempt to ingratiate themselves with the Arab Muslim Nazis.

 

But despite their efforts to defend themselves, by 1982, the Christians were being overwhelmed by the Muslims and the PLO terrorists.

 

The whole world watched in silence as the Christians were being slaughtered.

 

The United States, Europe and the United Nations did nothing.

 

 

A little Lebanese girl raped and murdered by Muslim terrorists

 

Although Lebanon's Maronite Christians follow the Roman Catholic Church, the Vatican was also silent as the Islamic Nazi genocide was being perpetrated in Lebanon.

 

In 1982, the remainder of Lebanon's Christian minority was saved not by America, not by Europe, not by the UN and not by the Vatican, but by little israel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

....and this was not the first , there was the Druze slaughter of christians in 1860 were it is estimated 7 - 11 thousand christians were murdered .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't you think Zeinab more qualified to answer , since she "alleges " to be Lebanese ....lol...but has remained strangely silent .

the responsibility to tell truth from lies should not only be restricted to one's nationality.

 

....and this was not the first , there was the Druze slaughter of christians in 1860 were it is estimated 7 - 11 thousand christians were murdered .

do you really have to go back as far as 1860? for the sake of argument, i assume your accusation is true, but why the sudden selective care about the slaughter of christians in lebanon in 1860 when your white christians were slaughtering muslims in many of their colonies in asia and africa and the combined number of victims amounted to millions? you failed to mention this. and your christian brothers in europe were still at each other's throat at that time. and if you go further as far back as 1271, you'll find that christians were still slaughtering muslims in their ninth crusade.

 

--The Lebanese Christians also became the bankers of the Arab world. Lebanese Christian-owned banks laundered huge sums of money for Arab Muslim dictators, Arab Muslim terrorists and Arab Muslim drug kingpins. Shocking images from a January 1976 Muslim terrorist atrocity in Lebanon - After the Lebanese Christian town of Damour was overrun by Arab Muslim terrorists - who proceeded to butcher its inhabitants - an entire family of Arab Christians was dragged through the streets and shot dead in front of a Muslim cameraman

taj, i know you are a proud zionist slave, but i think you have to try your best to find sources from more mainstream media other than the (you are not allowed to post links yet)"you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_you are not allowed to post links yetjtf(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/america/america.lebanon.part.one.htm"]jewish task force website[/url]. only until then i will take you more seriously.

 

honestly, what did you expect from this kind of website?

(you are not allowed to post links yet)"you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_you are not allowed to post links yetjtf(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/"]you can't post links until you reach 50 posts_you are not allowed to post links yetjtf(contact admin if its a beneficial link)/[/url]

 

however, i think this is just another poor attempt by your to divert attention from the topic of origins of a global bully.

 

wassalam,

y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yasnov , you dont know your butt from a hole in the ground . People diont leave the US to go "somewhere else " and certainly not to Indonesia , so quit badmouthing the US ......you aren't qualified , wqith your limited intellect , thats what bigotry does to the mind .....as far as knowing truth from lies ? hahahaha , YOU ARE THE LAST PERSON , ANYONE WOULD ACCUSE OF HAVINGTHAT ABILITY .

 

After the skewed , stunted and twisted education you recieved, it's a wonder you can even think ...oh wait , you can't .

 

And you criticize my going back to 1860 ? You bloody hypocrite , how many times have you done precisely the same ?

Forget 1860 anyway , the muslims there have had a long history of persecuting christians .....what about 1982 ?

 

Zeinab hasn't answered.....and niether have you , all youcan do is offer your childish accusation : "you are a zionist slave " .....that's a good indication of your mental ability .....a reaction rathjer than an intellectual response .

 

But you have no answer , nor does Zienab , that is why you shift the subject with your B.S.

 

 

As far as your respective countries , Indonesia and Lebanon for Zeinab , neither one of you have any right whatsoever to criticize the US , whereas BOTH your countries have slaughtered thousands ...and not in ancient history either .

And there are PLENTUY OF YOURS AND HER COUNTRYMEN WHO RUN TO THE US , but aint it funny , no ones running to where you are .

 

 

So if you're going to continue to dance around the article I brought up , either respond to it , or hold your tongue , especially your stupid little accusation of being a zionist slave ....that what your father taught

you ?

 

!0,000 christians were slaughtered -persecuted -raped ......in Lebanon by muslims between '75 and 1982 .

 

care to respond to THAT , before you go bad mouthing my country ?

 

 

Besides , it aint yor place anyway , Zeinab opened the thread with her childish insults toi my country , and SHE was asjked about the bad behavior of hers , so if you are gonna try to answer for her , then do it , otherwise ...buzz off .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So if you're going to continue to dance around the article I brought up , either respond to it , or hold your tongue

it's not an article that you brought up, taj. it's a propaganda mixed with lies, spin and etc. so, give me a real article before you expect someone to respond.

 

wassalam,

y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Besides , it aint yor place anyway , Zeinab opened the thread with her childish insults toi my country , and SHE was asjked about the bad behavior of hers , so if you are gonna try to answer for her , then do it , otherwise ...buzz off .

it's not people's intention to insult your country, taj. people just describe what they see. i also just describe what i see about you. i don't insult you by the zionist slave label, but define you for what you are. you don't want me to lie, do you?

 

wassalam,

y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
it's not people's intention to insult your country, taj. people just describe what they see. i also just describe what i see about you. i don't insult you by the zionist slave label, but define you for what you are. you don't want me to lie, do you?

 

wassalam,

y

 

 

Yasnov , you already ARE a LIAR , and as far as your tag of "zionist slave " that is not an objective observation , but an opinion based on a warped and perverted world view .

 

 

And YES , YOU DO INSULT ME , as is your intention , you LIE about that too .

 

I don't know any "zionists " in YOUR sense of the word , I dont know any jews who want to take over and rule the world , therefore how can I be a slave to an entity, I believe DOES NOT EXIST ???

 

So cut your b.s. Yasnov , and respond to the question posed to Zeinab , which you took upon yourself to answer , but so far have not , save for you just putting up a high pile of dung on this thread .

 

 

You don't describe what you see , you put a name on the bigoted impression of people who know you are full of B.S. ....self serving bigoted and hate mongering B.S>

 

You and your contemporaries need someone to blame for your miserable condition , and bad behavior , you need a rational for the things you do , yoiu need to create a justification for your action , so yoiu invent the " wooooooo world wide zionis plot ......and anyone who criticizes that or exposes your bigotry and hate ...is a "zionist slave "

You dump on the US every chance you get , because America and Americans are sympathetic to those whom you hate ...it's just that simple .

 

So save all your bull ....yu jumped in answer the question or hit the highway .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So cut your b.s. Yasnov , and respond to the question posed to Zeinab , which you took upon yourself to answer , but so far have not , save for you just putting up a high pile of dung on this thread .

taj, have you checked if your article has met the basic "cover both sides" journalistic standards?

 

wassalam,

y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yoiu need to create a justification for your action , so yoiu invent the " wooooooo world wide zionis plot ......and anyone who criticizes that or exposes your bigotry and hate ...is a "zionist slave "

i don't call any random person who argue with me about holocaust or zionism a zionist slave, taj. but you are special .... i thought it might be a praise for you rather than an insult?

 

wassalam,

y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
taj, have you checked if your article has met the basic "cover both sides" journalistic standards?

 

wassalam,

y

 

 

Yasnov , it is not "an article ' scraped offthe internet to serve a purpose ...it is fact in the public domain .....btw it happened before the internet , but THAT is irrelevant .

 

I dont know what your country allows you hear in the way of news or what you are allowed to read in your libraries ....but the event occurred , and the real number of dead is most likely higher since accurate census figures are rarely available in countries like YOURS , or Lebanon.

 

Muslims persecuted , raped and killed approximaterly 10,000 christian Lebanese between 1975 and 1982 .....which "journalistic side " is there other than what was recorded ?

 

Gonna parse words again yasnov ?

 

Gonna fight Zeinabs battles while she sits quitely on the sidelines trying to figure out a suitable excuse for an obvious slaughter with no excuse ....or perhaps you will provide one ?

 

OR ...perhaps you'll continue to do your danmce around it with your usual deflections ....when you have no answer .

 

 

As I said to Zeinab .....GO CLEAN UP YOUR OWN KITCHEN ....before you go badmouthing some one elses .

 

 

Go ask your teachers what happened , I'm sure they'll fill your head with more ideological rhetoric and half-truths .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yasnov , it is not "an article ' scraped offthe internet to serve a purpose ...it is fact in the public domain .....btw it happened before the internet , but THAT is irrelevant .

there are numerous events in this world that occurred before internet era, and we can still read about them on the Internet. i don't know what you are talking about.

 

wassalam,

y

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
By whom ? muslims in Lebanon ....when 1982 .

isn't this the time when israel invaded lebanon and massacred the people there?

 

Jewish Professor Benjamin Cohen of Tel Aviv University penned a statement on June 6, 1982:

I am writing to you while listening to a transistor that has just announced that 'we' are in the process of 'realizing our objectives' in Lebanon: to insure 'peace' for the residents of Galilee. These lies worthy of Goebbels make me mad. It is clear that this savage war, more barbaric than any of those preceding it, has nothing to do with the attempt in London or the security of Galilee ... Jews, sons of Abraham ... Jews, victims themselves of so much cruelty, how can they become so cruel? ... The greatest success of Zionism is the 'dejudaisation' of the Jews. ("Professor Leibowitz calls israeli politics in Lebanon Judeo-Nazi" Yediot Aharonoth, July 2, 1982)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×