Jump to content
Islamic Forum

Recommended Posts

I was just wondering, what do you think are some qualities or characteristics that make a president a good president :) I'll share my answers later insha-Allah. wasalaam

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PropellerAds

I was just wondering, what do you think are some qualities or characteristics that make a president a good president :) I'll share my answers later insha-Allah. wasalaam

 

Here is my list of what would make a good president of a republic:

  • The president must understand that he or she is a president of a republic, and not a monarch of a kingdom nor a dictator nor emperor of an empire.
  • The president must uphold the constitution of the republic to the best of his or her ability.
  • The president must be strong enough to resist any attempts to attain more power than is granted by the republic's constitution he or she is bound to uphold.
  • The president would understand that he or she is not exempt from the law.
  • The president must understand that he or she does not have the power to create laws or to unilaterally declare war on another nation or group.
  • The president must obey any court order if that order is constitutional.
  • The president must act, with force if necessary, to repel any IMMINENT danger to the people of the republic.
  • The president would exhaust all possible diplomatic options with hostile nations/groups before considering using force.
  • If the legislative body of the republic declares war, then the president would carry out, to the best of his or her ability, the duties of Commander-in-Chief to meet all the stated objectives in the declaration of war as quickly as possible while minimizing casualties on both sides.
  • The president would not rejoice with the injury or death of any human being.
  • The president must understand that he or she is the "face" of the entire citizenry that he or she represents, and should act accordingly as to not embarrass the people of the republic.
  • The president would know that he or she cannot run the world, cannot run the lives of people, and cannot run the economy, and would take no actions toward any of those three things. Only the people themselves can "run" those things.
  • The president would promote and protect the civil liberties of the republic's citizenry.

That's just off the top of my head.

Edited by Wanderer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea now go find one , because every President going back in recent history to atleast Stonewall Jackson , has broken at least "one or MORE of your rules " . In case you hadn't noticed , in a DEMOCRATIC Republic [uSA] ,that there are three branches of government to ensure a system of checks and balances . And The Supreme Court , has the final word on what is Constitutional and what is not . Nullification is not an option in a Democratic Republic .

 

BTW , the Constitution , NOT the President ENSURES the citizenry protection of their civil liberties as prescribed in the Constitution . These things have not and should not be left to whims or notions of any ONE man , not even the President .

Edited by Aligarr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea now go find one , because every President going back in recent history to atleast Stonewall Jackson , has broken at least "one or MORE of your rules " . In case you hadn't noticed , in a DEMOCRATIC Republic [uSA] ,that there are three branches of government to ensure a system of checks and balances . And The Supreme Court , has the final word on what is Constitutional and what is not . Nullification is not an option in a Democratic Republic .

 

BTW , the Constitution , NOT the President ENSURES the citizenry protection of their civil liberties as prescribed in the Constitution . These things have not and should not be left to whims or notions of any ONE man , not even the President .

 

Imagine that, a human being that doesn't 100% fulfill your expectations. You'd be hard-pressed to find anyone that conforms to whatever list of criteria you come up with. The Congress hasn't done much in relation to its responsibilities lately in terms of declaring war or curbing presidential overreach. Neither has the Supreme Court said to the current president, "No you can't just unilaterally decide to assassinate American citizens."

 

Also, a democratic republic is still a republic. Either way it's not supposed to be a monarchy nor an empire. We just happen to use democratic elections to choose our legislators and executives instead of undemocratic methods that are used in other republics. But it's still a republic.

 

The whole list I gave boiled down to the president basically being chained down by the Constitution, which also chains down the legislature and the judiciary. I also hinted at the separation of powers in my list; I'm not sure how you didn't get that.

 

Nullification didn't even enter my mind when I wrote my list because nullification originates more with the legislative rather than the executive branch. In our FEDERATION, we have two main levels of government: national and state. Nullification is a tool that has been used in the past both for noble and ignoble purposes by state legislatures who disagreed with laws passed by the national legislature. Nullification is yet another check against runaway government, only in this case it's between the levels of government, not between the branches of the national government. If the three branches in the national government colluded together against the states, then without nullification the states and their state constitutions would have no recourse to protect their citizens from a tyrannical federal government.

 

In fact, while we're at it, might as well bring up JURY NULLIFICATION as well. Just because the legislature passes a law and judges don't find anything wrong with it, that doesn't mean that juries cannot judge the law as well as the crime. As noted earlier, human beings are not 100% infallible, so when they draft these laws, they cannot foresee every single instance in which the law may be applied or even abused by the executive. Even if they are temporary, juries are still a part of the judicial branch, and they can always vote to not convict a person based upon misapplication of the law or they find the law itself is unjust or unconstitutional in the specific case they examine. Jury nullification serves as a necessary check by individual citizens against the government, as well as a judicial check against legislatures and executives.

 

Still though, I don't know exactly what set you off since there wasn't any real disagreement in the first place beyond nullification. Since the topic was only about the president, I listed what would make a good president. If the question said what would make a good government, I would have listed things pertaining to the legislature and the courts, as well as different levels of government and the responsibilities of individual citizens.

Edited by Wanderer
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As Wanderer said, the President is the face of the country, as exists in the United States. And yes the Constitution upholds the civil rights of the people, but the President must defend the Constitution or press for change (if the Constitution violates civil rights) instead of just being silent. A good president has to be able to negotiate and compromise in my opinion. Also, I believe that the president must be a man or woman of good character, lest the government be a laughing stock.

 

Congress is a whole 'nother fish so to speak. It is true that Congress is where the laws are made, and frankly a good Congressman or woman is one who actually serves. But this discussion is about presidents. Also as Wanderer said, there is never going to be any president that ever makes everyone happy. Even two of the greatest American presidents (Washington and Lincoln) weren't perfect...and Lincoln was hated not only by a segment that seceded but by some within his own government. A president has to make hard decisions, and hopefully he (or she) will make the right ones.

 

Lastly, just to clear up something real quick, I believe you meant Andrew Jackson and not Thomas J. "Stonewall" Jackson. Andrew Jackson was a president that history judges for his horrible treatment of the Native Americans whereas Stonewall Jackson was a Lieutenant General of the Confederate States of America. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As an aside, probably the only good thing Andrew Jackson did was to oversee the abolition of the second national bank of the United States. It's extremely ironic that Federal Reserve notes have Jackson's portrait. It is also improper to have Thomas Jefferson on a Federal Reserve note as well, who stated that "banking institutions are more dangerous than standing armies," and who fought Alexander Hamilton and his first national bank of the United States.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's been well over a week, and the original poster hasn't chimed in on what she believes makes a "good president," like she said she would. It sure would be nice to have more opinions on this matter...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By zainab[at]QE
      People across the globe believe that shia and sunni are the two different sects. Both of the sects have different religious beliefs, therefore it has been understood by people that they cannot come under the same umbrella ‘Islam’. Many people have this faith that due to the entirely different conduct of life, shia and sunni cannot marry with each other. However, before making such bold claims, complete research is very important to know the reality. So, before marrying with a shia man or woman, one must know that there are two types of shias:
      One of the types of shia holds disbeliefs (kufr), that the Quran has been altered, Hazrat Ali (R.A) is worthy to worship and here Shirk (to worship someone other than Allah) occurs, the angel Jibril made an error in descending the revelation on the Messenger of Allah (P.B.U.H) in place of Hazrat Ali (R.A), accusations on Hazrat Aisha (R.A) of committing adultery or denying the Companionship Hazrat Abu Bakr (R.A).
      However, the another type of shias are those who do not hold beliefs that constitute Kufr, such as believing that Hazrat Ali (R.A) was the rightful first Caliph after the demise of the Prophet Mohammad (P.B.U.H), belief in the twelve Imams, and all those beliefs which the first type of shias put faith in. 
      A true Muslim has asked by Prophet Mohammad (P.B.U.H) that before marrying, Muslim must need to check the religious beliefs, and religious practices in his/her partner. There is a Hadith in Sahih Bukhari that Messenger of Allah has said:
      "A woman is married for four reasons, her wealth, lineage, status and Deen. Choose the one who is religious." (Sahih Bukhari)
      Even then we being humans do not know that what faiths are hidden in the chest of people and what they are pretending, indeed! Allah knows the truth only. And so, we should avoid those things where we find doubts or dissatisfaction. If we go for things which are doubtful then we are tangling ourselves deliberately in the chaos.
    • Guest FireyWitness
      By Guest FireyWitness
      I am told by Muslims the Bible is corrupted book, I am asked "so how can you trust something in that book if you dont have reference, like we muslims have reference the Quran?"
      The Bible tells us why Jesus had to have been born of a virgin. The Quran doesn't tell why it just states He was born of a virgin. The only place and book in all history that information could be found before the Quran was written was in the NT Bible. The Bible has problems but no where near the amount Muslims think! The central message of the gospel is consistent and in tack fully.
      Now, I would have a problem with the Bible if there were a Christian version of Uthman (non prophet) who burned all our original manuscripts and recompiled them into a single book, but that never happened. So why shouldn't I continue trusting it?
    • By Absolute truth
      In the name of God, the Entirely Merciful, the Especially Merciful.

      Was Jesus God, a son of god , a man, a servant,or a prophet ?
      This post will answer those important questions from the bible itself.

      1) Was Jesus a servant ?
      Yes, the Bible says that :
      1 ) "Behold my servant, whom I have chosen." (Matthew 12:18)
      2) "The God of Abraham, and of Isaac,.... hath glorified his servant Jesus." (Acts 3:13(RSV)
      3) "For of a truth against thy holy servant Jesus, whom thou hast anointed...." ( Acts 4:27(RSV)
      The exact same word "pias" is attributed to Jacob (israel) in Luke 1:54 and translated as "servant "(( Can any father call his son "servant " . Can a servant equal his master ? .Who is supreme in rank ? Who orders who and who obeys who ? ))

      2) Was Jesus a man or a son of man?
      Yes, the Bible says that :
      1)ye men of israel , hear these word; Jesus of Nazareth, was a MAN approved of God among you by miracles, wonders, and signs.(Acts 2:22)
      2) the son of MAN came eating and drinking. (Matthew 11:19)
      3) this MAN is really the prophet. (John 7:40)
      3) Now ye seek to kill me, a MAN that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God .(John 8:40 KJV)
      4) “…so will the son of man be…” Matthew 12:40
      5) “For the son of man is going to come…” Matthew 16:27
      6) “…until they see the son of man coming in His kingdom.” Matthew 28
      7) “But so that you may know that the Son of Man has authority…” Mark 2:10
      “…because He is the son of man.” John 5:27
      9) “Jesus the Nazarene, a man attested to you by God with miracles and wonders and signs which God performed through Him in your midst, just as you yourselves know.” (Acts 2:22)
      10) “He will judge the world in righteousness through a man whom He has appointed” Acts 17:31
      (( Jesus testified himself that he is " a man" why didn`t he clearly and openly say: "Now you seek to kill me, God incarnate, who has told you the truth." Is it possible that he was hiding the truth? He denied any divinity to himself .Can a man be god ? The bible says strongly : “God is not a man...nor a son of man…” Numbers 23:19 . ))

      3) Was Jesus a prophet or a messenger ?
      Yes, the Bible says that :
      These are just some of the many Biblical verses which point out that Jesus was a prophet and a messenger of the one true God :
      1) this is Jesus the prophet of Nazareth. (Matthew 21:11)
      2) Jesus said, "A prophet is never accepted in his home town." (Luke 4:24)
      3) I tell you the truth, no servant is greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than
      the one who sent him. (John 13:16)
      4) Surely this is the prophet who is to come into the word. (John 24:19)
      5) "'What things?' he asked. 'About Jesus of Nazareth,' they replied. 'He was a prophet, powerful in word and deed before God and all the people.'" (Luke 24:19)

      4) Was Jesus a god or a son of god ?
      Jesus never said he is a god or a son of god Let us see what Jesus himself said :
      1) "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak." (John 12:49)
      2) I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me.(John 5:30)
      3) Hear, O israel: The Lord our God is one Lord" ((and this was the message of all prophets sent by Allah from Adam to Muhammad (peace be upon them all ) "There is no God but God" and if Jesus (peace be upon him) was a god or a son of god he would declare that strongly ))
      4) My father is greater than I (Jesus) (John 14:28)
      5) My father, who gave them to me, is greater than all. (John 10:29)
      6) What I teach is not my own teaching, but it comes from God,who sent me. (John 5:30) ((In these verses Jesus (peace be upon him) declares his complete submission and surrender to the will of our unique God and didn't impute any power or any strength to himself and that was the matter of all prophets before him ))
      7) "And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? There is none good but one, that is, God." (Mark 10:18) ((Jesus refused to be called "good" although we humanbeings describe ourselves "good" and this was the top of humbleness of Juses. Jesus emphatically corrects any notion that he was God; he does not like to be called even good, as genuine goodness is a quality of God alone. If Jesus were God, his words do not make sense; because, it does not befit God to humble Himself before His creatures.Then we don't believe that he claimed or accepted to be god or a son of god ))

      8) No one knows, however, when that day or hour will come neither the angels in heaven, nor the son; only the Father Knows. (mark 13:32) (( If he was god he should have known the time of that day but he said the truth and that does not belittle of his rank as one of the greatest prophets that God sent to the human beings . In fact a sincere seeker of the truth should accept what Jesus says about himself and not make Him God or the equal of God!))

      9) *Anyone who says something against the son of man can be forgiven, but whoever says something against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven-now or ever.(Matthew 12:32)
      10) I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God. (John 20:17) (( Then The father is the father of Jesus and all people ))
      11) Jesus said to him, "Away from me, Satan! For it is written: 'Worship the Lord your God, and him only.'" (Matthew 4:10)
      12) "Well said, teacher," the man replied. "You are right in saying that God is one and there is no other but him." (Mark 12:32)
      13) "The Lord our God is Lord alone! Therefore, you shall adore the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, with all your mind, and with all your strength." (Deuteronomy 6:4-5, Mark 12:29-30)

      5) Was Jesus the only one who was called the son of God in the Bible ?
      No,the Bible doesn't say that :
      1) Adam is the son of God. (Luke 3:38)
      2) israel is my first-born son.(Exodus 4:22)
      3) The Lord has said unto me, thou art my son; this day have I begotten thee." (Psalms 2:7,KJM).
      ,4) David is another begotten Son
      *Blessed are the peacemaker, for they will be called sons of God. (Matthew 5:9)

      ((Tracing this title : son of God" in the Bible, we can find many "sons of God" and that Jesus is not the only son.It can be concluded that the Bible uses this title" son of God" figuratively to mean Righteous, pious, selected, or God-conscious.))

      6) Can God be a man ?
      ((Can God be a man,eat as man,feel hungry ,go to toilet ,is crucified,tortured and be seen and be heard ,cry on the cross and be spit on his face and doesn't have the power to destroy his enemies and pray to his god.What god is that ?))

      1) “God is not a man...nor a son of man…” (Numbers 23:19)
      2) “...For I am God, and not man...” (Hosea 11:9)
      3) Matthew 26:39: "And he went a little farther, and fell on his face, and prayed, saying, O my Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me: nevertheless not as I will, but as thou wilt."
      4) in John 5:32 Jesus told his followers that they have never seen GOD at anytime nor ever heard his voice?
      5) "Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape." (John 5:37)
      6) "Eli, Eli, lama sabachtani (My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?)

      (( Finally after discussing evidence from the Bible . In fact that God is one, NOT THREE, that
      Jesus is not God or part of God, that he is not equal with God, and that He is not the son of God in the literal sense .The son of god is common in the Bible and it is not underage on Jesus only (peace be upon him )) Please be logical and be rational and don't say what Jesus (peace be upon him) didn't say about himself .He was a model in his faith and in his submission to the will of the only unique God (praise be to him ) . Saying Jesus is a god or a son of god is the biggest sin which God never forgive and Jesus himself prophesied that people would worship him uselessly and believe in doctrines made by men (Matthew 15:9). "But in vain they do worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." Jesus (peace be upon him) in this verse warns his followers from being worshippers to him .He ordered his people not to exaggerate in their love to him .
       
      And All praise is due to God, Lord of the worlds.
    • By Absolute truth
      Definitions:
      Fossils (from Latin fossus, literally "having been dug up") الحفرية are the preserved remains or traces of animals , plants, and other organisms from the remote past.
       
      Fossil record,السجل الحفري  history of life as documented by fossils, the remains or imprints of the organisms from earlier geological periods preserved in sedimentary rock.
       
      Paleontology or palaeontology علم المتحجرات أو الأحياء القديمة أو المستحاثات is the scientific study of prehistoric life.
       
      Archaeology, or archeology علم الآثار(from Greek "ancient"), is the study of human activity in the past, primarily through the recovery and analysis of the material culture and environmental data that they have left behind, which includes artifacts, architecture, biofacts and cultural landscapes (the archaeological record).
       
      Geochronology  التاريخ الجيولوجي is the science of determining the age of rocks, fossils, and sediments
       
      Anthropology علم الإنسان is the "science of humanity."
       
      Uniformitarianism is the assumption that the same natural laws and processes that operate in the universe now, have always operated in the universe in the past and apply everywhere in the universe.
       
      Phyletic gradualism is a model of evolution which theorizes that evolution occurs through the accumulation of slight modifications over long periods of time.
       
      Punctuated Equilibrium is a theory to explain the absence of transitional forms in the fossil record, which are predicted by Darwinian evolution, It proposes that most species will exhibit little net evolutionary change for most of their geological history, remaining in an extended state called stasis. When significant evolutionary change occurs, the hypothesis proposes that it is generally restricted to rare and geologically rapid events of branching speciation called cladogenesis. Cladogenesis is thought to be the process by which a species splits into two distinct species, rather than one species gradually transforming into another.
×