Jump to content
Islamic Forum
Sign in to follow this  
Saracen21stC

Shi’Ism And Nasibi

Recommended Posts


 

Foundation of Shi’ism is Nasibi
 

 


 

We
hope that, here,
we have proven beyond a doubt that the Prophet’s wives are indeed part of Ahlel
Bayt.



The Quran specifically refers to the
wives of the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) as Ahlel Bayt in the following verse:



“O wives of the Prophet! You
are not like any other of the women; If you will be on your guard, then be not soft
in your speech, lest he in whose heart is a disease yearn; and speak a good
word. And stay quietly in your houses, and make not a dazzling display, like
that of the former Times of Ignorance; and establish regular Prayer, and give
regular Charity; and obey Allah and His Messenger. And Allah only wishes to
remove all abomination from you, you Ahlel Bayt (People of the House),
and to make you pure and spotless.” (Quran, 33:32-33)



The transliteration reads: “Ya nisa al-nabiyi lastuna
kahadin mina alnisa-i ini itaqaytuna fala takhdaAAna bialqawli fayatmaAAa
allathee fee qalbihi maradun waqulna qawlan maAAroofan Waqarna fee buyootikunna
wala tabarrajna tabarruja aljahiliyyati al-oola waaqimna alssalata waateena
alzzakata waatiAAna Allaha warasoolahu innama yureedu Allahu liyuthhiba
AAankumu alrrijsa Ahlul Bayt-i wayutahhirakum tatheeran” (Quran,
33:32-33)



Thus we hope that it has become clear
that whoever slanders the Prophet’s wives and talks ill of them can be
considered a Nasibi (hater of the Ahlel Bayt). The most beloved of the
Prophet’s wives was Aisha (رضّى الله عنها). However, it, unfortunately, appears that
a very important premise of Shi’ism is based upon slander against her, the
Mother of the Believers and rightful member of the Ahlel Bayt.



Aisha (رضّى
الله عنها
) narrated a
Hadith in which the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله
وسلّم
) specifically
appointed Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه) to lead the prayers as Imam during the
Prophet’s sickness at the end of his life. The Sahabah (رضّى الله عنهم)
and the Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah rightfully interpreted this appointment to
mean that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) appointed Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه) as
his successor, not Ali (رضّى الله عنه). The majority of the Shia admit that Abu
Bakr (رضّى الله عنه) was the Imam of the prayers during the Prophet’s last few days
of life; however, they argue that the Prophet (صلّى
الله عليه وآله وسلّم
) had
really appointed Ali (رضّى الله عنه) to lead the prayers, but that Aisha (رضّى الله عنها)
lied to the people by claiming that the Prophet (صلّى
الله عليه وآله وسلّم
) had
appointed Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه) to lead the prayers. Recently, there have
been some Shia who have even gone to the extreme of denying known historical
events by saying that Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه) never led the prayers as Imam; they again
accuse Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) of being a liar, and say that the Hadith
about Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه) leading the prayers were fabricated by
Aisha (رضّى الله عنها).



Al-Tijani is a very popular Shia scholar
and writer who recently published his best-selling book “Then I was Guided.” In
this book, he says: “…either by his [Abu Bakr’s]
daughter Aisha, whose position vis-a-vis Ali is well documented, and she tried
hard to support her father, even by fabricating sayings [Hadith].” (Then
I was Guided, p.141) Al-Tijani futher says: “…she
[Aisha] played an important role in the denial of the Prophet’s will for Ali…” (Then
I was Guided, p.119-120) This book can be found referenced on the popular Shia
website Al-Islam.org, and it is at the forefront of the Shia dialogue with the
Ahlus Sunnah wal Jama’ah; this viewpoint that Aisha (رضّى الله عنها)
fabricated Hadith to prove her father’s claim to Caliphate is accepted by Ijma
(consensus) of all the Shia Ayatollahs and Maraje’ (high scholars).



Based on this, it is our understanding
that the Shia opposition to Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) cannot be understated. It is the foundation
block
of Shi’ism that Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) is a liar and a fabricator of Hadith.
Without believing in this, the Shia would be forced to accept Abu Bakr’s (رضّى الله عنه)
appointment as successor Imam and the entire belief of Ali (رضّى الله عنه)
being the first Infallible Imam becomes implausible. Thus, the Shia are faced
with two options: either they slander Aisha (رضّى
الله عنها
) and call her a
liar, or they accept Aisha (رضّى الله عنها) and then rescind their claims that it was
Ali (رضّى الله عنه) who was appointed as successor Imam by the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم).



The Shia claim to be the “followers of the
Ahlel Bayt,” but the reality is apparently otherwise; had they followed the
Ahlel Bayt (i.e. the Prophet’s wives), then they would have accepted Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه)
as the successor Imam to the Prophet (صلّى الله
عليه وآله وسلّم
) and the
Muslim Ummah would have remained united. The truth of the matter is that it is
the Shia who are the Nasibis, because they hate the Prophet’s wives. The Ahlus
Sunnah wal Jama’ah loves the entire Ahlel Bayt, including the Prophet’s
wives, all his children, Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and his family, etc., whereas the Shia
only love one segment of the Ahlel Bayt and despise other parts of it.



 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PropellerAds

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By zainab[at]QE
      People across the globe believe that shia and sunni are the two different sects. Both of the sects have different religious beliefs, therefore it has been understood by people that they cannot come under the same umbrella ‘Islam’. Many people have this faith that due to the entirely different conduct of life, shia and sunni cannot marry with each other. However, before making such bold claims, complete research is very important to know the reality. So, before marrying with a shia man or woman, one must know that there are two types of shias:
      One of the types of shia holds disbeliefs (kufr), that the Quran has been altered, Hazrat Ali (R.A) is worthy to worship and here Shirk (to worship someone other than Allah) occurs, the angel Jibril made an error in descending the revelation on the Messenger of Allah (P.B.U.H) in place of Hazrat Ali (R.A), accusations on Hazrat Aisha (R.A) of committing adultery or denying the Companionship Hazrat Abu Bakr (R.A).
      However, the another type of shias are those who do not hold beliefs that constitute Kufr, such as believing that Hazrat Ali (R.A) was the rightful first Caliph after the demise of the Prophet Mohammad (P.B.U.H), belief in the twelve Imams, and all those beliefs which the first type of shias put faith in. 
      A true Muslim has asked by Prophet Mohammad (P.B.U.H) that before marrying, Muslim must need to check the religious beliefs, and religious practices in his/her partner. There is a Hadith in Sahih Bukhari that Messenger of Allah has said:
      "A woman is married for four reasons, her wealth, lineage, status and Deen. Choose the one who is religious." (Sahih Bukhari)
      Even then we being humans do not know that what faiths are hidden in the chest of people and what they are pretending, indeed! Allah knows the truth only. And so, we should avoid those things where we find doubts or dissatisfaction. If we go for things which are doubtful then we are tangling ourselves deliberately in the chaos.
    • By mgharaibeh
      It is indeed that Mosul is bleeding and surrounded by Shia militias from Iraq, Iran and  Afghanistan.
      Everyone blamed the killing on Islamic State only as they think Shia militias are god sent angels to protect the people of Mosul who are Sunnis.  
       

       
       
    • By mgharaibeh
      More than 70 Shia died today after Islamic state bombing inside the heart of Sadr City
       
       

    • By mgharaibeh
      What is the difference Sunnis and Shia?
      Why do Shia hate Sunni so much?
    • By Saracen21stC
      Hadith of Ghadir Khumm [A Sunni Perspective]

                                      
                      
                          


      Introduction
      It is impossible to discuss the Hadith of Ghadir Khumm without first understanding the specific context in which the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم)
      said what he said. This is a general rule of thumb pertaining to the
      Islamic canon as a whole: it is important to know the background in
      which a Quranic verse was revealed or a certain Hadith was said.
      For example, the Quranic verse “slay them wherever you find them” is
      often used by Orientalists to wrongfully make it appear as if Islam
      advocates the slaying of people wherever you find them all the time.
      Of course, if we look at when this verse was revealed, we find that it
      was specifically revealed during a battle between the Muslims and the
      Quraish Mushriks; this makes us realize that it is not a general ruling
      to slay people but rather it was a verse revealed in a specific
      situation.
      Likewise, the Hadith of Ghadir Khumm can only be understood in the
      context in which it was said: A group of soldiers were severely
      criticizing Ali ibn Abi Talib (رضّى الله عنه) over a certain matter, and this news reached the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم),
      who then said what he said in the Hadith of Ghadir Khumm. Like the
      Orientalists, the Shia propagandists attempt to remove this background
      context in which the Hadith was said in order to paint a totally
      different (and misleading) picture.
      The Prophet’s intention behind saying what he said at Ghadir Khumm was not at all to nominate Ali (رضّى الله عنه) as Caliph but rather it was only to defend Ali (رضّى الله عنه)
      against the slander being said against him. It is only by removing the
      background context that it is possible to render a Shia understanding
      of the text; it is for this reason that we should always remind our
      Shia brothers of the background context in which the Hadith of Ghadir
      Khumm was said.
      The Importance of Ghadir Khumm to the Shia
      The Shia claim that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) divinely appointed Ali (رضّى الله عنه)
      to be his successor at a place called Ghadir Khumm. Before we discuss
      the event of Ghadir Khumm with our Shia brothers, we should first define
      the parameters of such a debate. In other words, we should “set the
      stakes”:
      (1) If the Shia can prove their version of Ghadir Khumm, then definitely Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was divinely appointed by the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) and the Shia creed is correct.
      (2) If, however, the Sunnis disprove the idea that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) appointed Ali (رضّى الله عنه) at Ghadir Khumm, then our Shia brothers should be willing to accept the fact that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was never appointed at all by the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) and therefore the entire Shia creed is invalid.
      The reason we need to make this very clear from the outset is that
      the Shia propagandists have this uncanny ability to move the goalposts
      whenever they lose a debate. They will jump from one topic to another;
      if they lose the debate over Ghadir Khumm, then they will bring up the
      Incident of the Door, or Saqifah, or Fadak, or who knows what else.
      The entire foundation of Shi’ism rests on the event of Ghadir Khumm, because it is here that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) supposedly nominated Ali (رضّى الله عنه) to be his successor. If this event did not take place as the Shia claim, then the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) never appointed Ali (رضّى الله عنه) and the Shia must abandon all of their claims, such as the idea that Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه) usurped the God-appointed Caliphate of Ali (رضّى الله عنه).
      Indeed, the event of Ghadir Khumm is so central to the Shia
      paradigm–and so important to the Shia theology–that the Shia masses have
      a yearly celebration known as “Eid-e-Ghadir”.
      Based on what supposedly happened at Ghadir Khumm, the Shia reject the Caliphate of Abu Bakr (رضّى الله عنه), split away from the mainstream Muslims, and declare that Ali (رضّى الله عنه)
      was the first of the divinely appointed Imams. The Shia website,
      Al-Islam.org, refers to Ghadir Khumm as a “momentous event” and the
      basis for the Imamah of Ali (رضّى الله عنه).
       
      Amaana.org says “Eid-e Gadhir is celebrated with great
      rejoicing by Shia Muslims where they remember Prophet Muhammad’s last
      instructions to the believers. Eid-e-Ghadir is one of the most important
      days of rejoicing for Shia Muslims around the world as that was the day
      our beloved Prophet Muhammad (s.a.s.) declared Hazrat Ali’s vicegerency
      at Ghadir e Khumm on his return from his last pilgrimage…

      source: http://www.amaana.org/gadhir/gadhir1.htm ” The reason it is neccessary to strongly emphasize the importance of
      Ghadir Khumm to the Shia is that we will show how the supposedly
      strongest ‘weapon’ in the arsenal of the Shia propaganda is actually
      very weak. If this is the very basis of Shi’ism, then indeed Shi’ism is
      a very weak doctrine. The Shia say that the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) appointed Ali (رضّى الله عنه) at Ghadir Khumm but simple logic dictates otherwise.
      What the Shia Claim Happened
       

       
      Al-Islam.org says “After completing his last pilgrimage
      (Hajjatul-Wada’), Prophet was leaving Makkah toward Madinah, where
      he and the crowd of people reached a place called Ghadir Khumm (which is
      close to today’s al-Juhfah). It was a place where people from
      different provinces used to greet each other before taking different
      routes for their homes.
      In this place, the following verse of the Qur’an was revealed:
      “O Apostle! Deliver what has been sent down to you from your Lord;
      and if you don’t do it, you have not delivered His message (at all); and
      Allah will protect you from the people …” (Qur’an 5:67)
      The last sentence in the above verse indicates that the Prophet
      was mindful of the reaction of his people in delivering that message but
      Allah informs him not to worry, for He will protect His Messenger from
      people.
      Then followed the key sentence denoting the clear designation of ‘Ali
      as the leader of the Muslim ummah. The Prophet held up the hand of
      ‘Ali and said:
      “For whoever I am his Leader (mawla), ‘Ali is his Leader (mawla).”
      Immediately after the Prophet finished his speech, the following verse of the Qur’an was revealed:
      “Today I have perfected your religion and completed my favour
      upon you, and I was satisfied that Islam be your religion.” (Qur’an 5:3)
      The above verse clearly indicates that Islam without clearing up
      matter of leadership after Prophet was not complete, and completion
      of religion was due to announcement of the Prophet’s immediate
      successor.
×